References
- Abbondanza, M., Rinaldi, L., Foppolo, F., & Marelli, M. (2021). The mental representation of nonnumerical quantifiers: The spatial-linguistic association of response codes (SLARC) effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(12), 2021–2028. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001037
- Adams, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Restrepo, M. A. (2019). Embodied reading in a transparent orthography. Learning and Instruction, 62, 27–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.03.003
- Adams, G. S., Converse, B. A., Hales, A. H., & Klotz, L. E. (2021). People systematically overlook subtractive changes. Nature, 592, 258–261. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03380-y
- Alisedo, G., Pastor, I., Ayala, D., Bacigalupo, E., Lassalle, L., & Costa, F. (2007).
Diccionario bilingüe de lengua de señas uruguaya/español . Asociación de Sordos de Uruguay. - Banks, B., Borghi, A. M., Fargier, R., Fini, C., Jonauskaite, D., Mazzuca, C., Montalti, M., Villani, C., & Woodin, G. (2022). Consensus Paper: Current Perspectives on Abstract Concepts and Future Research Directions. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
- Baroni, M., Dinu, G., & Kruszewski, G. (2014). Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 238–247). DOI: 10.3115/v1/P14-1023
- Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
- Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
- Baus, C., Carreiras, M., & Emmorey, K. (2013). When does iconicity in sign language matter? Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 261–271. DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.620374
- Bechtold, L., Cosper, S. H., Malyshevskaya, A., Montefinese, M., Morucci, P., Niccolai, V., Repetto, C., Zappa, A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2022). Brain Signatures of Embodied Semantics and Language: A Consensus Paper. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
- Berenhaus, M., Oakhill, J., & Rusted, J. (2015). When kids act out: A comparison of embodied methods to improve children’s memory for a story. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(4), 331–343. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12039
- Bergen, B. K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80(3), 290–311. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2004.0056
- Bergen, B. K. (2015).
Embodiment, simulation and meaning . In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics (pp. 158–173). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315685533 - Bhalla, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (1999). Visual–motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1076–1096. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1076
- Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10818–10823. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605782113
- Borghesani, V., & Piazza, M. (2017). The neuro-cognitive representations of symbols: The case of concrete words. Neuropsychologia, 105, 4–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.026
- Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001
- Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6
- Borreggine, K. L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). The action–sentence compatibility effect: It’s all in the timing. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1097–1112. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_91
- Boulenger, V., Mechtouff, L., Thobois, S., Broussolle, E., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2008). Word processing in Parkinson’s disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 743–756. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.007
- Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 ms of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciene, 18(10), 1607–1615. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607
- Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1482–1493. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482
- Carota, F., Moseley, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Body-part-specific representations of semantic noun categories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(6), 1492–1509. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00219
- Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367. DOI: 10.1037/a0015854
- Caselli, N. K., Sehyr, Z. S., Cohen-Goldberg, A. M., & Emmorey, K. (2017). ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 784–801. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0742-0
- Castillo, M., Fojo, A., & Aguirre, R. (2021). Distribution of unidimensional space in the LSU time lexicon. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 3259).
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5qn2w1p2 - Chasteen, A. L., Burdzy, D. C., & Pratt, J. (2010). Thinking of God moves attention. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 627–630. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.029
- Connell, L. (2007). Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition, 102(3), 476–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.009
- Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2009). Is a bear white in the woods? Parallel representation of implied object color during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 573–577. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.573
- Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2012). When does perception facilitate or interfere with conceptual processing? The effect of attentional modulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 474. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00474
- Connolly, A. C., Gleitman, L. R., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2007). Effect of congenital blindness on the semantic representation of some everyday concepts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(20), 8241–8246. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702812104
- wiek, A., Fuchs, S., Draxler, C., Asu, E. L., Dediu, D., Hiovain, K., Kawahara, S., Koutalidis, S., Krifka, M., Lippus, P., Lupyan, G., Oh, G. E., Paul, J., Petrone, C., Ridouane, R., Reiter, S., Schümchen, N., Szalontai, A., Ünal-Logacev, Ö., Zeller, J., Perlman, M., & Winter, B. (2021). The bouba/kiki effect is robust across cultures and writing systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 377(1841), Article 20200390. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0390
- D’Ascenzo, S., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Fischer, M. H. (2020). Assessing orienting of attention to understand the time course of mental calculation. Cognitive Processing, 21(4), 493–500. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-020-00970-y
- de Koning, B. B., Wassenburg, S. I., Bos, L. T., & van der Schoot, M. (2017). Mental simulation of four visual object properties: Similarities and differences as assessed by the sentence–picture verification task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(4), 420–432. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1281283
- de Vega, M., Moreno, V., & Castillo, D. (2013). The comprehension of action-related sentences may cause interference rather than facilitation on matching actions. Psychological Research, 77(1), 20–30. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0356-1
- Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(3), 371–396. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
- Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(10), 654–672. DOI: 10.1002/lnc3.361
- Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
- Dooley, E. (2021).
SNARC effect for verbal probability quantifiers in economic decision making task . [Master’s thesis, Berlin School of Mind & Brain, Humboldt University]. The Open Science Framework.https://osf.io/uq5zr/?view_only=11cbe1a11a8c401892ee391c00a6a92e - Drijvers, L., & Özyürek, A. (2017). Visual context enhanced: The joint contribution of iconic gestures and visible speech to degraded speech comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 212–222. DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0101
- Drijvers, L., Özyürek, A., & Jensen, O. (2018). Hearing and seeing meaning in noise: Alpha, beta, and gamma oscillations predict gestural enhancement of degraded speech comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 39(5), 2075–2087. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23987
- Emmorey, K. (2001).
Space on hand: The exploitation of signing space to illustrate abstract thought . In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 147–174). MIT Press. - Estes, Z., & Barsalou, L. W. (2018). A comprehensive meta-analysis of spatial interference from linguistic cues: Beyond Petrova et al. (2018). Psychological Science, 29(9), 1558–1564. DOI: 10.1177/0956797618794131
- Estes, Z., Verges, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the objects’ typical location. Psychological Science, 19(2), 93–97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02051.x
- Fischer, M. H. (2012). A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied and situated numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing, 13(S1), S161–S164. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0477-5
- Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: Spatial–numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 260. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
- Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2018). Number concepts: Abstract and embodied. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), Article 20170125. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0125
- Fischer, M. H., Winter, B., Felisatti, A., Myachykov, A., Mende, M. A., & Shaki, S. (2021). More Instructions Make Fewer Subtractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 20616. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720616
- Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701623605
- Frak, V., Nazir, T., Goyette, M., Cohen, H., & Jeannerod, M. (2010). Grip force is part of the semantic representation of manual action verbs. PloS one, 5(3), Article
e9728 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009728 - Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2016). Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cognitive Science, 40(1), 145–171. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12251
- Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000310
- Gambrell, L. B., & Jawitz, P. B. (1993). Mental imagery, text illustrations, and children’s story comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 265–276. DOI: 10.2307/747998
- García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A. (2016). A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 59–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.022
- Garrido, M. V., & Godinho, S. (2021). When vowels make us smile: The influence of articulatory feedback in judgments of warmth and competence. Cognition and Emotion, 35(5), 837–843. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1900076
- Gianelli, C., Farnè, A., Salemme, R., Jeannerod, M., & Roy, A. C. (2011). The agent is right: When motor embodied cognition is space-dependent. PLoS one, 6(9). Article
e25036 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025036 - Gibbs, R. W.
Jr. , (2017).Embodiment . In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 449–462). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316339732 - Glenberg, A. M. (2015). Few believe the world is flat: How embodiment is changing the scientific understanding of cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 165–171. DOI: 10.1037/cep0000056
- Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905–922. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
- Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
- Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196313
- Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28(1), 1–26. DOI: 10.1080/01638539909545067
- Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379–401. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2714
- Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006). Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(18), 4917–4921. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5389-05.2006
- Gómez, L., & Glenberg, A. M. (2022).
Embodied classroom activities for vocabulary acquisition . In S. L. Macrine, & J. Fugate (Eds.), Movement Matters: How Embodied Cognition Informs Teaching and Learning (pp. 77–90). MIT Press. - Gozli, D. G., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2013). The cost and benefit of implicit spatial cues for visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1028–1046. DOI: 10.1037/a0030362
- Günther, F., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2016). Latent semantic analysis cosines as a cognitive similarity measure: Evidence from priming studies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 626–653. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1038280
- Günther, F., Nguyen, T., Chen, L., Dudschig, C., Kaup, B., & Glenberg, A. M. (2020). Immediate sensorimotor grounding of novel concepts learned from language alone. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, Article 104172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104172
- Günther, F., Petilli, M. A., Vergallito, A., & Marelli, M. (2020). Images of the unseen: Extrapolating visual representations for abstract and concrete words in a data-driven computational model. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01429-7
- Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). Vector-space models of semantic representation from a cognitive perspective: A discussion of common misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 1006–1033. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619861372
- Hald, L. A., Marshall, J.-A., Janssen, D. P., & Garnham, A. (2011). Switching modalities in a sentence verification task: ERP evidence for embodied language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 45. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00045
- Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
- Harris, Z. (1954). Distributional structure. Word, 10(2–3), 146–162. DOI: 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520
- Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
- Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 436–441. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194085
- Havas, D. H., Glenberg, A. M., Gutowski, K., Lucarelli, M., & Davidson, R. (2010). Cosmetic use of Botulinum Toxin-A affects processing of emotional language. Psychological Science, 21, 895–900. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610374742
- Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.002
- Hockett, C. F. (1963).
The problem of universals in language . In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 1–29). MIT Press. - Holler, J., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Processing language in face-to-face conversation: Questions with gestures get faster responses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1900–1908. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1363-z
- Holler, J., & Wilkin, K. (2011). Co-speech gesture mimicry in the process of collaborative referring during face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 35(2), 133–153. DOI: 10.1007/s10919-011-0105-6
- Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12(5), 360–365. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00367
- Horchak, O. V., & Garrido, M. V. (2022). Simulating background settings during spoken and written sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02061-9
- Horchak, O. V., Giger, J. C., Cabral, M., & Pochwatko, G. (2014). From demonstration to theory in embodied language comprehension: A review. Cognitive Systems Research, 29, 66–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.09.002
- Horchak, O. V., Giger, J. C., & Pochwatko, G. (2014). Discourse comprehension and simulation of positive emotions. Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 35(1), 17–37.
- Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. (2011). Looking at anything that is green when hearing “frog”: How object surface colour and stored object colour knowledge influence language-mediated overt attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 122–145. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.481474
- Huettig, F., Guerra, E., & Helo, A. (2020). Towards understanding the task dependency of embodied language processing: The influence of colour during language-vision interactions. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), Article 41. DOI: 10.5334/joc.135
- Ibáñez, A., Kühne, K., Miklashevsky, A., Monaco, E., Muraki, E., Ranzini, M., Speed, L. J., & Tuena, C. (2022). The importance of considering individual differences and context to understand embodied language processes [Manuscript submitted for publication].
- Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), Article 20130298. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0298
- Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), S103–S109. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
- Johansson Falck, M., & Gibbs, R. W.
Jr. , (2012). Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(2), 251–272. DOI: 10.1515/cog-2012-0008 - Johns, B. T., & Jones, M. N. (2012). Perceptual inference through global lexical similarity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 103–120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01176.x
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.
- Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 883–895. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701623852
- Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics, 1(1), 164–190. DOI: 10.2478/opli-2014-0009
- Kim, J. S., Elli, G. V., & Bedny, M. (2019). Knowledge of animal appearance among sighted and blind adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(23), 11213–11222. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900952116
- Kita, S. (1997). Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics, 35(2), 379–415. DOI: 10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379
- Klatzky, R. L., Pellegrino, J. W., McCloskey, B. P., & Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(1), 56–77. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(89)90028-4
- Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. Liveright.
- Körner, A., & Rummer, R. (2022). Articulation contributes to valence sound symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(5), 1107–1114. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001124
- Körner, A., Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2015). Routes to embodiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 940. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00940
- Kuhnke, P., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2020). Task-dependent recruitment of modality-specific and multimodal regions during conceptual processing. Cerebral Cortex, 30(7), 3938–3959. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa010
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
- Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
- Lenci, A. (2008). Distributional semantics in linguistic and cognitive research. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 20(1), 1–31.
- Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication: Origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 6–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010
- Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 731. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731
- Lewis, M., Zettersten, M., & Lupyan, G. (2019). Distributional semantics as a source of visual knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19237–19238. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1910148116
- Liu, D., Cai, D., Verguts, T., & Chen, Q. (2017). The time course of spatial attention shifts in elementary arithmetic. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 921. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01037-3
- Louwerse, M. M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381–398. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x
- Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 273–302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
- Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114(1), 96–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.002
- Louwerse, M. M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Language encodes geographical information. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 51–73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01003.x
- Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Switching attention between modalities: Further evidence for visual dominance. Psychological Research, 74(3), 255–267. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0246-y
- Lupyan, G., Abdel Rahman, R., Boroditsky, L., & Clark, A. (2020). Effects of language on visual perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 930–944. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.08.005
- Lynott, D., & Connell, L. (2009). Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 558–564. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.558
- Macedonia, M. (2014). Bringing back the body into the mind: Gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1467. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01467
- Machery, E. (2007). Concept empiricism: A methodological critique. Cognition, 104(1), 19–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.002
- Madan, C. R., & Singhal, A. (2012). Using actions to enhance memory: Effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 507. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00507
- Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1–3), 59–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004
- Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 57–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.001
- Mannaert, L. N. H., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2017). Is color an integral part of a rich mental simulation? Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 974–982. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0708-1
- Manrique, E., & Enfield, N. (2015). Suspending the next turn as a form of repair initiation: Evidence from Argentine sign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1326. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01326
- Masson, M., Letesson, C., & Pesenti, M. (2018). Time course of overt attentional shifts in mental arithmetic: Evidence from gaze metrics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 1009–1019. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1318931
- McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in non-symbolic arithmetic. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(8), 1324–1333. DOI: 10.3758/BF03192949
- Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788–804. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
- Mioni, G., Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2021). Heuristics and biases in the mental manipulation of magnitudes: Evidence from length and time production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(3), 536–547. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820967663
- Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R. C., Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2014). How arbitrary is language? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), Article 20130299. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0299
- Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. DOI: 10.1111/josl.1_12177
- Morey, R. D., Kaschak, M. P., Díez-Álamo, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., Zwaan, R. A., Lakens, D., … & Ziv-Crispel, N. (2022). A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(2), 613–626. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01927-8
- Murgiano, M., Motamedi, Y., & Vigliocco, G. (2021). Situating language in the real-world: The role of multimodal iconicity and indexicality. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), Article 38. DOI: 10.5334/joc.113
- Myachykov, A., Scheepers, C., Fischer, M. H., & Kessler, K. (2014). TEST: A tropic, embodied, and situated theory of cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(3), 442–460. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12024
- Naor-Raz, G., Tarr, M. J., & Kersten, D. (2003). Is color an intrinsic property of object representation? Perception, 32(6), 667–680. DOI: 10.1068/p5050
- Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. (2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1120–1136. DOI: 10.1037/a0015574
- Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 220–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008
- Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. DOI: 10.1080/01690960344000008
- Oben, B., & Brône, G. (2016). Explaining interactive alignment: A multimodal and multifactorial account. Journal of Pragmatics, 104, 32–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.07.002
- Ohala, J. (1994).
The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch . In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound Symbolism (pp. 325–347). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511751806.022 - Ostarek, M., & Bottini, R. (2021). Towards strong inference in research on embodiment: Possibilities and limitations of causal paradigms. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), Article 5. DOI: 10.5334/joc.139
- Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Six challenges for embodiment research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 593–599. DOI: 10.1177/0963721419866441
- Ostarek, M., Joosen, D., Ishag, A., de Nijs, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Are visual processes causally involved in “perceptual simulation” effects in the sentence-picture verification task? Cognition, 182, 84–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.017
- Pan, Y., Dikker, S., Goldstein, P., Zhu, Y., Yang, C., & Hu, Y. (2020). Instructor-learner brain coupling discriminates between instructional approaches and predicts learning. NeuroImage, 211, Article 116657. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116657
- Papesh, M. H. (2015). Just out of reach: On the reliability of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), e116–e141. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000125
- Parise, C. V., & Spence, C. (2012). Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: A study using the Implicit Association Test. Experimental Brain Research, 220(3–4), 319–333. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3140-6
- Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14(2), 119–124. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429
- Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 164–167. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206477
- Pereira, F., Gershman, S., Ritter, S., & Botvinick, M. (2016). A comparative evaluation of off-the-shelf distributed semantic representations for modelling behavioural data. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33(3–4), 175–190. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1176907
- Perniss, P., Thompson, R., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 227. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
- Petilli, M. A., Günther, F., Vergallito, A., Ciapparelli, M., & Marelli, M. (2021). Data-driven computational models reveal perceptual simulation in word comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 117, Article 104194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104194
- Petrova, A., Navarrete, E., Suitner, C., Sulpizio, S., Reynolds, M., Job, R., & Peressotti, F. (2018). Spatial congruency effects exist, just not for words: Looking into Estes, Verges, and Barsalou (2008). Psychological Science, 29(7), 1195–1199. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617728127
- Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., Spivey, M., & McRae, K. (2013). Computational grounded cognition: A new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 612. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612
- Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (2012). Sign language. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110261325
- Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–226. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
- Platonova, O., & Miklashevsky, A. (2022). Warm + fuzzy: Perceptual semantics can be activated even during surface lexical processing. Manuscript in preparation. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A85H7
- Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. DOI: 10.1080/00335558008248231
- Pouw, W., & Holler, J. (2020). Timing in conversation is dynamically adjusted turn by turn: Evidence for lag-1 negatively autocorrelated turn taking times in telephone conversation. PsyArXiv preprint. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/b98da
- Pouw, W., Proksch, S., Drijvers, L., Gamba, M., Holler, J., Kello, C., Schaefer, R. S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2021). Multilevel rhythms in multimodal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1835), Article 20200334. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0334
- Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Hauk, O. (2009). Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain and Language, 110(2), 81–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.001
- Rasenberg, M., Özyürek, A., & Dingemanse, M. (2020). Alignment in multimodal interaction: An integrative framework. Cognitive Science, 44(11), Article
e12911 . DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12911 - Reggin, L. D., Gómez Franco, L. E., Horchak, O. V., Labrecque, D., Lana, N., Lorenzini, I., Rio, L., & Vigliocco, G. (2022). Language is not acquired in the lab but in the real world: The role of embodied and situated cognition. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
- Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2020a). The use of number words in natural language obeys Weber’s law. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(7), 1215–1230. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000715
- Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2020b). Maps and space are entangled with language experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 853–855. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.009
- Rinaldi, L., Parente, L., & Marelli, M. (2022). Toward a unified account of nonsymbolic and symbolic representations of number: Insights from a combined psychophysical-computational approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 985–994. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-02043-3
- Robinson, M. D., & Thomas, L. E. (2021).
Introduction to Embodied Psychology: Thinking, Feeling, and Acting . In M. D. Robinson & L. E. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Embodied Psychology (pp. 1–19). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_1 - Rueschemeyer, S. A., Glenberg, A. M., Kaschak, M., Mueller, K., & Friederici, A. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up contributions to understanding sentences describing objects in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 183. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00183
- Rummer, R., & Schweppe, J. (2019). Talking emotions: Vowel selection in fictional names depends on the emotional valence of the to-be-named faces and objects. Cognition and Emotion, 33(3), 404–416. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1456406
- Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Schlegelmilch, R., & Grice, M. (2014). Mood is linked to vowel type: The role of articulatory movements. Emotion, 14(2), 246–250. DOI: 10.1037/a0035752
- Sahlgren, M. (2008). The distributional hypothesis. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 20, 33–53.
- Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225–239. DOI: 10.1037/h0070931
- Scerrati, E., Baroni, G., Borghi, A. M., Galatolo, R., Lugli, L., & Nicoletti, R. (2015). The modality-switch effect: Visually and aurally presented prime sentences activate our senses. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1668. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01668
- Scerrati, E., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2017). The multilevel modality-switch effect: What happens when we see the bees buzzing and hear the diamonds glistening. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 798–803. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1150-2
- Schank, R. C., & Abelson R. P. (1977).
Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures . Lawrence Erlbaum. - Scheepers, C., & Sturt, P. (2014). Bidirectional syntactic priming across cognitive domains: From arithmetic to language and back. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1643–1654. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.873815
- Schembri, A., Fenlon, J., Rentelis, R., Reynolds, S., & Cormier, K. (2013). Building the British sign language corpus. Language Documentation & Conservation, 7, 136–154.
http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4592 - Schneider, E., Maruyama, M., Dehaene, S., & Sigman, M. (2013). Eye gaze reveals a fast, parallel extraction of the syntax of arithmetic formulas. Cognition, 125(3), 475–490. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.015
- Shaki, S., Pinhas, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2018). Heuristics and biases in mental arithmetic: Revisiting and reversing operational momentum. Thinking and Reasoning, 24(2), 138–156. DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2017.1348987
- Shapiro, L., & Spaulding, S. (2021).
Embodied Cognition . In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 ed.). Stanford University.https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/embodied-cognition/ - Shebani, Z., & Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Flexibility in language action interaction: The influence of movement type. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 252. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00252
- Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1992). Representation of colors in the blind, color-blind, and normally sighted. Psychological Science, 3(2), 97–104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00006.x
- Shtyrov, Y., Butorina, A., Nikolaeva, A., & Stroganova, T. (2014). Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(18), E1918–E1923. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323158111
- Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1619–1643. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1361-1
- Sinte, A. (2013).
Expression of time in French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB) . In L. Meurant, A. Sinte, M. van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Sign language research, uses and practices: Crossing views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics (pp. 205–235). De Gruyter Mouton; Ishara Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781614511472.205 - Snefjella, B., Lana, N., & Kuperman, V. (2020). How emotion is learned: Semantic learning of novel words in emotional contexts. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, Article 104171. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104171
- Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., Ruiter, J. P. de, Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587–10592. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
- ter Bekke, M., Drijvers, L., & Holler, J. (2020). The predictive potential of hand gestures during conversation: An investigation of the timing of gestures in relation to speech. PsyArXiV preprint. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/b5zq7
- Thompson, P. D., & Estes, Z. (2011). Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(12), 2392–2404. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605898
- Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). The link between form and meaning in American Sign Language: Lexical processing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 550–557. DOI: 10.1037/a0014547
- Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 77–110. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90005-6
- Trujillo, J. P., Levinson, S. C., & Holler, J. (2021).
Visual information in computer-mediated interaction matters: Investigating the association between the availability of gesture and turn transition timing in conversation . In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience Case Studies (pp. 643–657). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78468-3_44 - Trujillo, J. P., Özyürek, A., Holler, J., & Drijvers, L. (2021). Speakers exhibit a multimodal Lombard effect in noise. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 16721. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95791-0
- Tsaregorodtseva, O., Frazier, L., Stolterfoht, B., & Kaup, B. (2022). Does language activate the sensorimotor properties of the entities it refers to and, if so, under what circumstances? Manuscript in preparation. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N7M9U
- Vainio, L., & Vainio, M. (2021). Sound-action symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 718700. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718700
- van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., Zwaan, R. A., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The functional role of motor activation in language processing: Motor cortical oscillations support lexical-semantic retrieval. NeuroImage, 50(2), 665–677. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.123
- Vedaldi, A., & Lenc, K. (2015). MatConvNet: Convolutional neural networks for Matlab. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 689–692). DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2807412
- Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48(4), 422–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001
- Vogt, A., Kaup, B., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2021). Experience-driven meaning affects lexical choices during language production. PsyArXiV preprint. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/ru7ms
- Wasner, M., Moeller, K., Fischer, M. H., & Nuerk, H. C. (2014). Aspects of situated cognition in embodied numerosity: The case of finger counting habits. Cognitive Processing, 15, 317–328. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-014-0599-z
- Whalen, D. H., & Levitt, A. G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 23(3), 349–366. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0
- Winter, A., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2021). The action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE) a benchmark finding for embodiment: A meta-analysis. PsyArXiV preprint. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/wfpz7
- Winter, B. (2019). Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/celcr.20
- Winter, B., Perlman, M., Perry, L. K., & Lupyan, G. (2017). Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words. Interaction Studies, 18(3), 443–464. DOI: 10.1075/is.18.3.07win
- Wu, L. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica, 132(2), 173–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002
- Yee, E., Ahmed, S. Z., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). Colorless green ideas (can) prime furiously. Psychological Science, 23(4), 364–369. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611430691
- Yu, C. S., McBeath, M. K., & Glenberg, A. M. (2021). The gleam-glum effect: /i:/ versus // phonemes generically carry emotional valence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(7), 1173–1185. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001017
- Zwaan, R. A. (2021). Two challenges to “embodied cognition” research and how to overcome them. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), Article 14. DOI: 10.5334/joc.151
- Zwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: Six replication attempts. PLoS one, 7(12), Article
e51382 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051382 - Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162