References
- Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369–406. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369
- Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
- Anderson, J. R. (1992). Automaticity and the ACT theory. The American Journal of Psychology, 105(2), 165–180. DOI: 10.2307/1423026
- Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1999). Practice and retention: A unifying analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1120–1136. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1120
- Behmer, L. P.,
Jr. , & Fournier, L. R. (2014). Working memory modulates neural efficiency over motor components during a novel action planning task: An EEG study. Behavioural Brain Research, 260, 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.031 - Cattaneo, L., Caruana, F., Jezzini, A., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009). Representation of goal and movements without overt motor behavior in the human motor cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(36), 11134–11138. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2605-09.2009
- Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97(3), 332–407. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.332
- Cox, G. E., & Criss, A. H. (2020). Similarity leads to correlated processing: A dynamic model of encoding and recognition of episodic associations. Psychological Review, 127(5), 792–828. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000195
- Crump, M. J. C., & Logan, G. D. (2010). Hierarchical control and skilled typing: Evidence for word level control over the execution of individual keystrokes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(6), 1369–1380. DOI: 10.1037/a0020696
- Davelaar, E. J. (2011). Processes versus representations: cognitive control as emergent, yet componential. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 247–252. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01138.x
- Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.1.229
- Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967).
Human performance . Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. - Fournier, L. R., Behmer, L. P., & Stubblefield, A. M. (2014a). Interference due to shared features between action plans is influenced by working memory span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1524–1529. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0627-0
- Fournier, L. R., Gallimore, J. M., Feiszli, K. R., & Logan, G. D. (2014b). On the importance of being first: Serial order effects in the interaction between action plans and ongoing actions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 163–169. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0486-0
- Fournier, L. R., Hansen, D. A., Stubblefield, A. M., & Van Dongen, H. P. (2020). Action plan interrupted: resolution of proactive interference while coordinating execution of multiple action plans during sleep deprivation. Psychological Research, 84(2), 454–467. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1054-z
- Fournier, L. R., & Richardson, B. P. (2021). Partial repetition between action plans delays responses to ideomotor compatible stimuli. Psychological Research (pp. 1–15). DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01491-9
- Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., McMeans, R., Mattson, P. S., Kirkwood, J., & Herzog, T. (2010). Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response. Psychological Research, 74(4), 359–369. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0256-9
- Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., & Tadesse, E. F. (2015). Action plans can interact to hinder or facilitate reach performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8), 2755–2767. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0959-5
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Glover, S. (2004). Planning and control in action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(1), 57–69. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X04520022
- Glover, S., Wall, M. B., & Smith, A. T. (2012). Distinct cortical networks support the planning and online control of reaching-to-grasp in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35(6), 909–915. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08018.x
- Goodale, M. A. (2014). How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 1785–1794. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0337
- Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 22–25. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8
- Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77(2), 73–99. DOI: 10.1037/h0028689
- Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus–response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376–384. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
- Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95(4), 528–551. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1067–1082. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1067
- Hommel, B. (2019). Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2. 0: Representing and controlling perception and action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(7), 2139–2154. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01779-4
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–937. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
- Jeannerod, M., & Jeannerod, M. (1997). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action (Vol. 1997). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Jueptner, M., Stephan, K. M., Frith, C. D., Brooks, D. J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Passingham, R. E. (1997). Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77(3), 1313–1324. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1313
- Kilic, A., Criss, A. H., Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2017). Models that allow us to perceive the world more accurately also allow us to remember past events more accurately via differentiation. Cognitive Psychology, 92, 65–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.005
- Kühn, S., Keizer, A. W., Colzato, L. S., Rombouts, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2011). The neural underpinnings of event-file management: Evidence for stimulus-induced activation of and competition among stimulus–response bindings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(4), 896–904. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21485
- Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107(1), 32–63. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.107.1.32
- Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(2), 189–207. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.189
- Logan, G. D. (1985). Executive control of thought and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193–210. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90055-1
- Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
- Logan, G. D. (2018). Automatic control: How experts act without thinking. Psychological Review, 125, 453–485. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000100
- Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. (2011).
Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: The case for skilled typewriting . In B. Ross (Ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 1–27. Burlington: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00001-2 - Mattson, P. S., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 1236–1247. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1236
- Mattson, P. S., Fournier, L. R., & Behmer, L. P. (2012). Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(7), 1446–1460. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0335-7
- McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105(4), 724–760. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.734-760
- Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 3–26. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90013-0
- Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. DOI: 10.1037/10039-000
- Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, 1, 1–55.
- Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2013). Dissecting the response in response–effect compatibility. Experimental Brain Research, 224(4), 647–655. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3343-x
- Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116(1), 129–156. DOI: 10.1037/a0014420
- Posner, M., & Snyder, C. (1975).
Attention and cognitive control . In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale. - Prinz, W. (1990).
A common coding approach to perception and action . In: O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships Between Perception and Action. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0_7 - Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154. DOI: 10.1080/713752551
- Richardson, B., Pfister, R., & Fournier, L. R. (2020). Free-choice and forced-choice actions: Shared representations and conservation of cognitive effort. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(5), 2516–2530. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-01986-4
- Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102(1), 28–67. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.28
- Rosenbaum, D. A., Meulenbroek, R. J., Vaughan, J., & Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108, 709–734. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.709
- Rosenbloom, P. S., & Newell, A. (1986). The chunking of goal hierarchies: A generalized model of practice. Machine learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, 2, 247–288.
- Rougier, N. P., Noelle, D. C., Braver, T. S., Cohen, J. D., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2005). Prefrontal cortex and flexible cognitive control: Rules without symbols. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(20), 7338–7343. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502455102
- Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 152(2), 229–242. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1548-8
- Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53(2), 91–127. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90067-1
- Shiffrin, R. M., Ratcliff, R., & Clark, S. E. (1990). List-strength effect: II. theoretical mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 179–195. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.163
- Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84(2), 127–190. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
- Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 145–166. DOI: 10.3758/BF03209391
- Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943–974. DOI: 10.1037/a0020541
- Snyder, K. M., & Logan, G. D. (2014). The problem of serial order in skilled typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1697–1717. DOI: 10.1037/a0037199
- Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1625
- Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002).
Feature integration between perception and action . In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance, 19, 538–552. Oxford: Oxford University Press. PMID: 25909766. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005 - Thomaschke, R., Hopkins, B., & Miall, R. C. (2012). The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects. Psychological Review, 119(2), 388–407. DOI: 10.1037/a0027453
- Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5
- Verwey, W. B. (1999). Evidence for a multistage model of practice in a sequential movement task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1693–1708. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1693
- Wiediger, M. D., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: The generalization of response compatibility interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1136–1149. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1136
- Woltz, D. J. (1988). An investigation of the role of working memory in procedural skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(3), 319–331. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.319
- Yaniv, I., Meyer, D. E., Gordon, P. C., Huff, C. A., & Sevald, C. A. (1990). Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 1–26. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90007-M