Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ecological Meanings: A Consensus Paper on Individual Differences and Contextual Influences in Embodied Language Cover

Ecological Meanings: A Consensus Paper on Individual Differences and Contextual Influences in Embodied Language

Open Access
|Oct 2023

References

  1. Abrevaya, S., Fittipaldi, S., García, A. M., Dottori, M., Santamaria-Garcia, H., Birba, A., … Ibáñez, A. (2020). At the heart of neurological dimensionality: Cross-nosological and multimodal cardiac interoceptive deficits. Psychosomatic Medicine, 82(9), 850861. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000868
  2. Abrevaya, S., Sedeño, L., Fitipaldi, S., Pineda, D., Lopera, F., Buritica, O., … García, A. M. (2016). The road less traveled: Alternative pathways for action-verb processing in Parkinson’s Disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 55(4), 14291435. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160737
  3. Adams, A. M. (2016). How language is embodied in bilinguals and children with specific language impairment. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1209. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01209
  4. Ahlberg, D. K., Bischoff, H., Kaup, B., Bryant, D., & Strozyk, J. V. (2017). Grounded cognition: Comparing Language × Space interactions in first language and second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 123. DOI: 10.1017/S014271641700042X
  5. Amoruso, L., Ibáñez, A., Fonseca, B., Gadea, S., Sedeño, L., Sigman, M., … Fraiman, D. (2017). Variability in functional brain networks predicts expertise during action observation. NeuroImage, 146, 690700. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.041
  6. Amoruso, L., Pusil, S., García, A. M., & Ibanez, A. (2022). Decoding motor expertise from fine-tuned oscillatory network organization. Human Brain Mapping. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25818
  7. Amoruso, L., Sedeño, L., Huepe, D., Tomio, A., Kamienkowski, J., Hurtado, E., … Ibáñez, A. (2014). Time to Tango: Expertise and contextual anticipation during action observation. NeuroImage, 98, 366385. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.005
  8. Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85(4), 249277. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.4.249
  9. Aravena, P., Courson, M., Frak, V., Cheylus, A., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2014). Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163
  10. Aravena, P., Delevoye-Turrell, Y., Deprez, V., Cheylus, A., Paulignan, Y., Frak, V., & Nazir, T. (2012). Grip force reveals the context sensitivity of language-induced motor activity during “Action Words” processing: Evidence from sentential negation. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e50287. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050287
  11. Arévalo, A., Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Butler, A., Bates, E., & Dronkers, N. (2007). Action and object processing in aphasia: From nouns and verbs to the effect of manipulability. Brain and Language, 100(1), 7994. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.012
  12. Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37(2), 286309. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12006
  13. Athanasopoulos, P., & Casaponsa, A. (2020). The Whorfian brain: Neuroscientific approaches to linguistic relativity. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(5–6), 393412. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2020.1769050
  14. Baez, S., García, A. M., & Ibanez, A. (2017). The social context network model in psychiatric and neurological diseases. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, 30, 379396. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2016_443
  15. Baez, S., Herrera, E., Trujillo, C., Cardona, J. F., Diazgranados, J. A., Pino, M., … García, A. M. (2020). Classifying Parkinson’s Disease patients with syntactic and socio-emotional verbal measures. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 12, 586233. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.586233
  16. Bak, T. H., O’Donovan, D. G., Xuereb, J. H., Boniface, S., & Hodges, J. R. (2001). Selective impairment of verb processing associated with pathological changes in Brodmann areas 44 and 45 in the motor neurone disease-dementia-aphasia syndrome. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 124(Pt 1), 103120. DOI: 10.1093/brain/124.1.103
  17. Baron-Cohen, S., & Harrison, J. E. (Eds.). (1997). Synaesthesia: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. xiii, 281). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  18. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
  19. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
  20. Barsalou, L. W. (2019). Establishing generalizable mechanisms. Psychological Inquiry, 30(4), 220230. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2019.1693857
  21. Barsalou, L. W. (2020). Challenges and ppportunities for grounding cognition. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 31. DOI: 10.5334/joc.116
  22. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, Embodiment, and Meaning (pp. 245283). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0013
  23. Beauprez, S.-A., Bidet-Ildei, C., & Hiraki, K. (2019). Does watching Han Solo or C-3PO similarly influence our language processing? Psychological Research. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01169-3
  24. Beauprez, S.-A., Blandin, Y., Almecija, Y., & Bidet-Ildei, C. (2020). Physical and observational practices of unusual actions prime action verb processing. Brain and Cognition, 138, 103630. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103630
  25. Bechtold, L., Ghio, M., Antoch, G., Turowski, B., Wittsack, H.-J., Tettamanti, M., & Bellebaum, C. (2019). How words get meaning: The neural processing of novel object names after sensorimotor training. NeuroImage, 197, 284294. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.069
  26. Bechtold, L., Ghio, M., Lange, J., & Bellebaum, C. (2018). Event-related desynchronization of mu and beta oscillations during the processing of novel tool names. Brain and Language, 177–178, 4455. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.01.004
  27. Bedny, M., & Saxe, R. (2012). Insights into the origins of knowledge from the cognitive neuroscience of blindness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(1–2), 5684. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2012.713342
  28. Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 150158. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002
  29. Beveridge, M. E. L., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). Perspective taking in language: Integrating the spatial and action domains. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00577
  30. Birba, A., Beltrán, D., Martorell Caro, M., Trevisan, P., Kogan, B., Sedeño, L., … García, A. M. (2020). Motor-system dynamics during naturalistic reading of action narratives in first and second language. NeuroImage, 216, 116820. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116820
  31. Birba, A., García-Cordero, I., Kozono, G., Legaz, A., Ibáñez, A., Sedeño, L., & García, A. M. (2017). Losing ground: Frontostriatal atrophy disrupts language embodiment in Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 80, 673687. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.011
  32. Birba, A., Santamaría-García, H., Prado, P., Cruzat, J., Ballesteros, A. S., Legaz, A., … Ibáñez, A. (2022). Allostatic-interoceptive overload in frontotemporal dementia. Biological Psychiatry, S0006322322010423. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.02.955
  33. Birba, A., Vitale, F., Padrón, I., Dottori, M., de Vega, M., Zimerman, M., … García, A. M. (2020). Electrifying discourse: Anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex selectively reduces action appraisal in naturalistic narratives. Cortex, 132, 460472. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.005
  34. Bocanegra, Y., García, A. M., Lopera, F., Pineda, D., Baena, A., Ospina, P., … Cuetos, F. (2017). Unspeakable motion: Selective action-verb impairments in Parkinson’s disease patients without mild cognitive impairment. Brain and Language, 168, 3746. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.005
  35. Bottini, R., Ferraro, S., Nigri, A., Cuccarini, V., Bruzzone, M. G., & Collignon, O. (2020). Brain regions involved in conceptual retrieval in sighted and blind people. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(6), 10091025. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01538
  36. Bottini, R., Morucci, P., D’Urso, A., Collignon, O., & Crepaldi, D. (2021). The concreteness advantage in lexical decision does not depend on perceptual simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 151(3), 731738. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001090
  37. Boulenger, V., Mechtouff, L., Thobois, S., Broussolle, E., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2008). Word processing in Parkinson’s disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 743756. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.007
  38. Boyle, M., & Coelho, C. A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 9498. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360.0404.94
  39. Branscheidt, M., Hoppe, J., Zwitserlood, P., & Liuzzi, G. (2018). TDCS over the motor cortex improves lexical retrieval of action words in post-stroke aphasia. Journal of Neurophysiology, 199(2), 621630. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00285.2017
  40. Brown, C. H. (2013). Hand and Arm. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from https://wals.info/chapter/129
  41. Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Giles, G. E., Holmes, A., & Taylor, H. A. (2016). Mentally simulating narrative perspective is not universal or necessary for language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(10), 15921605. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000250
  42. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., … Rizzolatti, G. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x
  43. Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2014). Linguistic relativity in SLA: Toward a new research program. Language Learning, 64(4), 952985. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12080
  44. Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2015). Emotionality differences between a native and foreign language: Implications for everyday life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 214219. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414566268
  45. Calvo, N., Abrevaya, S., Martínez Cuitiño, M., Steeb, B., Zamora, D., Sedeño, L., … García, A. M. (2019). Rethinking the neural basis of prosody and non-literal language: Spared pragmatics and cognitive compensation in a bilingual with extensive right-hemisphere damage. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 570. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00570
  46. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 12431249. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi007
  47. Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16(19), 19051910. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065
  48. Candidi, M., Maria Sacheli, L., Mega, I., & Aglioti, S. M. (2014). Somatotopic mapping of piano fingering errors in sensorimotor experts: TMS studies in pianists and visually trained musically naïves. Cerebral Cortex, 24(2), 435443. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs325
  49. Cardona, J. F., Gershanik, O., Gelormini-Lezama, C., Houck, A. L., Cardona, S., Kargieman, L., … Ibáñez, A. (2013). Action-verb processing in Parkinson’s disease: New pathways for motor-language coupling. Brain Structure & Function, 218(6), 13551373. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-013-0510-1
  50. Cardona, J. F., Kargieman, L., Sinay, V., Gershanik, O., Gelormini, C., Amoruso, L., … Ibáñez, A. (2014). How embodied is action language? Neurological evidence from motor diseases. Cognition, 131(2), 311322. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.001
  51. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351367. DOI: 10.1037/a0015854
  52. Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 378383. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411422058
  53. Casasanto, D. (2016). A shared mechanism of linguistic, cultural, and bodily relativity. Language Learning, 66(3), 714730. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12192
  54. Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. (2014). Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 473479. DOI: 10.1037/a0033297
  55. Casasanto, D., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2011). When left is “right”: Motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science, 22(4), 419422. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611401755
  56. Cattaneo, Z., Vecchi, T., Cornoldi, C., Mammarella, I., Bonino, D., Ricciardi, E., & Pietrini, P. (2008). Imagery and spatial processes in blindness and visual impairment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(8), 13461360. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.002
  57. Cayol, Z., Rotival, C., Paulignan, Y., & Nazir, T. A. (2020). “Embodied” language processing: Mental motor imagery aptitude predicts word-definition skill for high but not for low imageable words in adolescents. Brain and Cognition, 145, 105628. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105628
  58. Cayol, Z., & Nazir, T. A. (2020). Why language processing recruits modality specific brain regions: It is not about understanding words, but about modelling situations. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 35. DOI: 10.5334/joc.124
  59. Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 79116. DOI: 10.1515/langcog.2010.004
  60. Chiou, R., & Rich, A. (2014). The role of conceptual knowledge in understanding synaesthesia: Evaluating contemporary findings from a “hub-and-spokes” perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00105. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00105
  61. Cipora, K., He, Y., & Nuerk, H. (2020). The spatial–numerical association of response codes effect and math skills: Why related? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1477(1), 519. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14355
  62. Cipora, K., Soltanlou, M., Reips, U.-D., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2019). The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects. Behavior Research Methods, 51(4), 16761692. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01213-5
  63. Cohen Kadosh, R., & Henik, A. (2006). When a line is a number: Color yields magnitude information in a digit-color synesthete. Neuroscience, 137(1), 35. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.057
  64. Colletta, J.-M., Guidetti, M., Capirci, O., Cristilli, C., Demir, O. E., Kunene-Nicolas, R. N., & Levine, S. (2015). Effects of age and language on co-speech gesture production: An investigation of French, American, and Italian children’s narratives. Journal of Child Language, 42(1), 122145. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000913000585
  65. Connell, L. (2019). What have labels ever done for us? The linguistic shortcut in conceptual processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 13081318.
  66. Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2014). Principles of representation: Why you can’t represent the same concept twice. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(3), 390406. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12097
  67. Connolly, A. C., Gleitman, L. R., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2007). Effect of congenital blindness on the semantic representation of some everyday concepts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(20), 82418246. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702812104
  68. Costello, M. C., & Bloesch, E. K. (2017). Are older adults less embodied? A Review of Age Effects through the Lens of Embodied Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00267
  69. Cotelli, M., Borroni, B., Manenti, R., Alberici, A., Calabria, M., Agosti, C., … Cappa, S. F. (2006). Action and object naming in frontotemporal dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration. Neuropsychology, 20(5), 558565. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.5.558
  70. Croijmans, I., Arshamian, A., Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2021). Wine experts’ recognition of wine odors is not verbally mediated. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 150(3), 545559. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000949
  71. Croijmans, I., & Majid, A. (2016). Not all flavor expertise Is equal: The language of wine and coffee experts. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0155845. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155845
  72. Croijmans, I., Speed, L. J., Arshamian, A., & Majid, A. (2020). Expertise shapes multimodal imagery for wine. Cognitive Science, 44(5), e12842. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12842
  73. Cytowic, R. E., & Eagleman, D. M. (2011). Wednesday Is Indigo Blue: Discovering the Brain of Synesthesia. MIT Press.
  74. Damasio, A. R., & Tranel, D. (1993). Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(11), 49574960. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.11.4957
  75. de Groot, A. M. (1992). Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 10011018. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1001
  76. de la Fuente, A., Sedeño, L., Vignaga, S. S., Ellmann, C., Sonzogni, S., Belluscio, L., … Ibañez, A. (2019). Multimodal neurocognitive markers of interoceptive tuning in smoked cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44(8), 14251434. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-019-0370-3
  77. De Scalzi, M., Rusted, J., & Oakhill, J. (2015). Embodiment effects and language comprehension in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cognitive Science, 39(5), 890917. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12187
  78. Della Putta, P. (2018). Embodied semantics and the mirror neurons: Past research and some proposals for the future. In A. Baicchi, R. Digonnet, & J. L. Sandford (Eds.), Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology (pp. 2143). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91277-6_2
  79. Dennison, H. Y., & Bergen, B. K. (2010). Language-driven motor simulation is sensitive to social context. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 32(32). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9rq4w5jb
  80. Desai, R. H., Herter, T., Riccardi, N., Rorden, C., & Fridriksson, J. (2015). Concepts within reach: Action performance predicts action language processing in stroke. Neuropsychologia, 71, 217224. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.006
  81. Díaz-Rivera, M., Birba, A., Fittipaldi, S., Mola, D., Morera, Y., De Vega, M., … García, A. M. (2022). Multidimensional inhibitory signatures of sentential negation in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Cerebral Cortex. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac074
  82. Difrancesco, S., Pulvermüller, F., & Mohr, B. (2012). Intensive language-action therapy (ILAT): The methods. Aphasiology, 26(11), 13171351. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2012.705815
  83. Dijkstra, K., Yaxley, R. H., Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The role of age and perceptual symbols in language comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 352356. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.352
  84. Dijkstra, N., Bosch, S. E., & van Gerven, M. A. J. (2019). Shared neural mechanisms of visual perception and imagery. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 423434. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.004
  85. Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175197. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728902003012
  86. Dijkstra, T., Wahl, A., Buytenhuijs, F., Halem, N. V., Al-Jibouri, Z., Korte, M. D., & Rekké, S. (2019). Multilink: A computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4), 657679. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728918000287
  87. Dreyer, F. R., Picht, T., Frey, D., Vajkoczy, P., & Pulvermüller, F. (2020). The functional relevance of dorsal motor systems for processing tool nouns– evidence from patients with focal lesions. Neuropsychologia, 141, 107384. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107384
  88. Durand, E., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2013). Recovery from anomia following Semantic Feature Analysis: Therapy-induced neuroplasticity relies upon a circuit involving motor and language processing areas. The Mental Lexicon, 8(2), 195215. DOI: 10.1075/ml.8.2.04dur
  89. Durand, E., Berroir, P., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2018). The neural and behavioral correlates of anomia recovery following personalized observation, execution, and mental imagery therapy: A proof of concept. Neural Plasticity, 2018, e5943759. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5943759
  90. Durand, E., Masson-Trottier, M., Sontheimer, A., & Ansaldo, A. I. (2021). Increased links between language and motor areas: A proof-of-concept study on resting-state functional connectivity following Personalized Observation, Execution and Mental imagery therapy in chronic aphasia. Brain and Cognition, 148, 105659. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105659
  91. Estes, Z., & Barsalou, L. W. (2018). A comprehensive meta-analysis of spatial interference from linguistic cues: Beyond Petrova et al. (2018). Psychological Science, 29(9), 15581564.
  92. Everard, G. J., Ajana, K., Dehem, S. B., Stoquart, G. G., Edwards, M. G., & Lejeune, T. M. (2020). Is cognition considered in post-stroke upper limb robot-assisted therapy trials? A brief systematic review. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. Internationale Zeitschrift Fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue Internationale De Recherches De Readaptation, 43(3), 195198. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000420
  93. Eyigoz, E., Courson, M., Sedeño, L., Rogg, K., Orozco-Arroyave, J. R., Nöth, E., … García, A. M. (2020). From discourse to pathology: Automatic identification of Parkinson’s disease patients via morphological measures across three languages. Cortex, 132, 191205. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.020
  94. Fargier, R., Paulignan, Y., Boulenger, V., Monaghan, P., Reboul, A., & Nazir, T. A. (2012). Learning to associate novel words with motor actions: Language-induced motor activity following short training. Cortex, 48(7), 888899. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.003
  95. Fargier, R., Ploux, S., Cheylus, A., Reboul, A., Paulignan, Y., & Nazir, T. A. (2014). Differentiating semantic categories during the acquisition of novel words: Correspondence analysis applied to event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11), 25522563. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00669
  96. Fernandino, L., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Blindauer, K., Hiner, B., Spangler, K., & Desai, R. H. (2013). Where is the action? Action sentence processing in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 51(8), 15101517. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.008
  97. Ferri, F., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Costantini, M. (2011). Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 49(13), 35193524. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.001
  98. Finkbeiner, M., Forster, K., Nicol, J., & Nakamura, K. (2004). The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.004
  99. Fittipaldi, S., Abrevaya, S., Fuente, A. de la, Pascariello, G. O., Hesse, E., Birba, A., … Ibáñez, A. (2020). A multidimensional and multi-feature framework for cardiac interoception. NeuroImage, 212, 116677. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116677
  100. Foroni, F. (2015). Do we embody second language? Evidence for ‘partial’ simulation during processing of a second language. Brain and Cognition, 99(Supplement C), 816. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.06.006
  101. Frak, V., Nazir, T., Goyette, M., Cohen, H., & Jeannerod, M. (2010). Grip force is part of the semantic representation of manual action verbs. PLoS One, 5(3), 5. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009728
  102. Galton, F. (1880). Visualised Numerals. Nature, 21(533), 252256. DOI: 10.1038/021252a0
  103. García, A. M., Abrevaya, S., Kozono, G., Cordero, I. G., Córdoba, M., Kauffman, M. A., … Ibáñez, A. (2017). The cerebellum and embodied semantics: Evidence from a case of genetic ataxia due to STUB1 mutations. Journal of Medical Genetics, 54(2), 114124. DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104148
  104. García, A. M., Bocanegra, Y., Herrera, E., Moreno, L., Carmona, J., Baena, A., … Ibáñez, A. (2018). Parkinson’s disease compromises the appraisal of action meanings evoked by naturalistic texts. Cortex, 100, 111126. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.003
  105. García, A. M., Carrillo, F., Orozco-Arroyave, J. R., Trujillo, N., Vargas Bonilla, J. F., Fittipaldi, S., … Cecchi, G. A. (2016). How language flows when movements don’t: An automated analysis of spontaneous discourse in Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Language, 162, 1928. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.07.008
  106. García, A. M., Hesse, E., Birba, A., Adolfi, F., Mikulan, E., Caro, M. M., … Ibáñez, A. (2020). Time to face language: Embodied mechanisms underpin the inception of face-related meanings in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 30(11), 60516068. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa178
  107. García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A. (2014). Two-person neuroscience and naturalistic social communication: The role of language and linguistic variables in brain-coupling research. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 124. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00124
  108. García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A. (2016). A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68(Supplement C), 5995. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.022
  109. García-Cordero, I., Sedeño, L., De La Fuente, L., Slachevsky, A., Forno, G., Klein, F., … & Ibañez, A. (2016). Feeling, learning from and being aware of inner states: interoceptive dimensions in neurodegeneration and stroke. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1708). DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0006
  110. Ghandhari, M., Fini, C., Da Rold, F., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Different kinds of embodied language: A comparison between Italian and Persian languages. Brain and Cognition, 142, 105581. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105581
  111. Gianelli, C. (2018). Embodied language and perspective taking in light of movement disorders. Cortex, 100, 226231. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.021
  112. Gianelli, C., Marzocchi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2017). Grasping the agent’s perspective: A kinematics investigation of linguistic perspective in Italian and German. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00042
  113. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (pp. xiv, 332). Boston, MA, US: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
  114. Gili, T., Fiori, V., Pasquale, G. D., Sabatini, U., Caltagirone, C., & Marangolo, P. (2017). Right sensory-motor functional networks subserve action observation therapy in aphasia. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 11(5), 13971411. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-016-9635-1
  115. Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905922. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
  116. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558565. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196313
  117. Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12(6), 516522. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00395
  118. Gonzalez Campo, C., Salamone, P. C., Rodríguez-Arriagada, N., Richter, F., Herrera, E., Bruno, D., … Sedeño, L. (2020). Fatigue in multiple sclerosis is associated with multimodal interoceptive abnormalities. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 26(14), 18451853. DOI: 10.1177/1352458519888881
  119. Grosjean, F., & Li, P. (2013). The Psycholinguistics of Bilingualism. John Wiley & Sons.
  120. Grossenbacher, P. G., & Lovelace, C. T. (2001). Mechanisms of synesthesia: Cognitive and physiological constraints. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(1), 3641. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01571-0
  121. Günther, F., Nguyen, T., Chen, L., Dudschig, C., Kaup, B., & Glenberg, A. M. (2020). Immediate sensorimotor grounding of novel concepts learned from language alone. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, 104172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104172
  122. Han, P., Croy, I., Raue, C., Bensafi, M., Larsson, M., Cavazzana, A., & Hummel, T. (2020). Neural processing of odor-associated words: An fMRI study in patients with acquired olfactory loss. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 14(4), 11641174. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-019-00062-2
  123. Hardwick, R. M., Caspers, S., Eickhoff, S. B., & Swinnen, S. P. (2018). Neural correlates of action: Comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 3144. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003
  124. Hargreaves, I. S., White, M., Pexman, P. M., Pittman, D., & Goodyear, B. G. (2012). The question shapes the answer: The neural correlates of task differences reveal dynamic semantic processing. Brain and Language, 120(1), 7378. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.004
  125. Hasson, U., Egidi, G., Marelli, M., & Willems, R. M. (2018). Grounding the neurobiology of language in first principles: The necessity of non-language-centric explanations for language comprehension. Cognition, 180, 135157. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.018
  126. Hauk, O., & Tschentscher, N. (2013). The body of evidence: What can neuroscience tell us about embodied semantics? Frontiers in Psychology, 4. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00050
  127. Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 11661186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
  128. Hirschfeld, G., Feldker, K., & Zwitserlood, P. (2012). Listening to “flying ducks”: Individual differences in sentence-picture verification investigated with ERPs. Psychophysiology, 49(3), 312321. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01315.x
  129. Hoeben Mannaert, L. N., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2019). How are mental simulations updated across sentences? Memory & Cognition, 47(6), 12011214. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00928-2
  130. Holt, L. E., & Beilock, S. L. (2006). Expertise and its embodiment: Examining the impact of sensorimotor skill expertise on the representation of action-related text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(4), 694701. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193983
  131. Hubbard, E. M., Brang, D., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). The cross-activation theory at 10. Journal of Neuropsychology, 5(2), 152177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-6653.2011.02014.x
  132. Hubbard, E. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2005). Neurocognitive mechanisms of synesthesia. Neuron, 48(3), 509520. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.012
  133. Humphries, S., Holler, J., Crawford, T. J., Herrera, E., & Poliakoff, E. (2016). A third-person perspective on co-speech action gestures in Parkinson’s disease. Cortex, 78, 4454. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.02.009
  134. Ibáñez, A. (2018). Brain oscillations, inhibition and social inappropriateness in frontotemporal degeneration. Brain, 141(10), e73. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy233
  135. Ibáñez, A. (2019). Insular networks and intercognition in the wild. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 115, 341344. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.024
  136. Ibáñez, A., Billeke, P., de la Fuente, L., Salamone, P., García, A. M., & Melloni, M. (2017). Reply: Towards a neurocomputational account of social dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 140(3), e15. DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww316
  137. Ibáñez, A., Cardona, J. F., Dos Santos, Y. V., Blenkmann, A., Aravena, P., Roca, M., … Bekinschtein, T. (2013). Motor-language coupling: Direct evidence from early Parkinson’s disease and intracranial cortical recordings. Cortex, 49(4), 968984. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.02.014
  138. Ibáñez, A., & García, A. M. (2018). Contextual Cognition: The Sensus Communis of a Situated Mind. Springer.
  139. Ibañez, A., & Manes, F. (2012). Contextual social cognition and the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 78(17), 13541362. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182518375
  140. Ibanez, A., & Schulte, M. (2020). Situated minds: Conceptual and emotional blending in neurodegeneration and beyond. Brain, 143(12), 35233525. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa392
  141. James, K. H., & Swain, S. N. (2011). Only self-generated actions create sensori-motor systems in the developing brain. Developmental Science, 14(4), 673678. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01011.x
  142. Jarvis, S. (2016). Clarifying the scope of conceptual transfer. Language Learning, 66(3), 608635. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12154
  143. Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2007). Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203935927
  144. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), S1039. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
  145. Jeannerod, M. (2006). Motor cognition: What actions tell the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569657.001.0001
  146. Joshi, A., Han, P., Faria, V., Larsson, M., & Hummel, T. (2020). Neural processing of olfactory-related words in subjects with congenital and acquired olfactory dysfunction. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 14377. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71245-x
  147. Kargieman, L., Herrera, E., Baez, S., García, A. M., Dottori, M., Gelormini, C., … Ibáñez, A. (2014). Motor–language coupling in Huntington’s Disease families. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00122. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00122
  148. Kaup, B., Scherer, N., & Ulrich, R. (2021). Associations between abstract concepts: Investigating the relationship between deictic time and valence. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 612720. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.612720
  149. Kemmerer, D. (2015). Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 10681075. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0784-1
  150. Kemmerer, D. (2019). The perspective from cognitive neuroscience. In D. Kemmerer (Ed.), Concepts in the Brain (pp. 2960). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190682620.003.0002
  151. Kiefer, M., Sim, E.-J., Liebich, S., Hauk, O., & Tanaka, J. (2007). Experience-dependent Plasticity of Conceptual Representations in Human Sensory-Motor Areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(3), 525542. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.525
  152. Kim, J. S., Elli, G. V., & Bedny, M. (2019). Knowledge of animal appearance among sighted and blind adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(23), 1121311222. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900952116
  153. Kogan, B., García-Marco, E., Birba, A., Cortés, C., Melloni, M., Ibáñez, A., & García, A. M. (2020). How words ripple through bilingual hands: Motor-language coupling during L1 and L2 writing. Neuropsychologia, 146, 107563. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107563
  154. Kogan, B., Muñoz, E., Ibáñez, A., & García, A. M. (2020). Too late to be grounded? Motor resonance for action words acquired after middle childhood. Brain and Cognition, 138, 105509. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.105509
  155. Kosslyn, S. M., & Pomerantz, J. R. (1977). Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 5276. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90004-4
  156. Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149174. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
  157. Kroll, J. F., Hell, J. G. V., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 373381. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891000009X
  158. Kühne, K., & Gianelli, C. (2019). Is embodied cognition bilingual? Current evidence and perspectives of the embodied cognition approach to bilingual language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00108
  159. Ladyka-Wojcik, N., & Barense, M. D. (2021). Reframing spatial frames of reference: What can aging tell us about egocentric and allocentric navigation? WIREs Cognitive Science, 12(3), e1549. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1549
  160. Lebois, L. A. M., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W. (2015). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science, 39(8), 17641801. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12174
  161. Li, P., & Jeong, H. (2020). The social brain of language: Grounding second language learning in social interaction. Npj Science of Learning, 5(1), 19. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-020-0068-7
  162. Liuzzi, G., Freundlieb, N., Ridder, V., Hoppe, J., Heise, K., Zimerman, M., … Hummel, F. C. (2010). The involvement of the left motor cortex in learning of a novel action word lexicon. Current Biology, 20(19), 17451751. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.034
  163. Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 273302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
  164. Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2008). How fundamental is embodiment to language comprehension? Constraints on embodied cognition. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 13131318.
  165. Lowry, E., Puthusseryppady, V., Coughlan, G., Jeffs, S., & Hornberger, M. (2020). Path integration changes as a cognitive marker for vascular cognitive impairment?—A pilot study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00131. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00131
  166. Lucy, J. A. (2016). Recent advances in the study of linguistic relativity in historical context: A critical assessment. Language Learning, 66(3), 487515. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12195
  167. Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Language is not just for talking: Redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychological Science, 18(12), 10771083. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02028.x
  168. Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2020). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: Multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 12711291. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
  169. Madan, C. R., & Singhal, A. (2013). Introducing TAMI: An objective test of ability in movement imagery. Journal of Motor Behavior, 45(2), 153166. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2013.763764
  170. Majid, A., Jordan, F., & Dunn, M. (2015). Semantic systems in closely related languages. Language Sciences, 49, 118. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.11.002
  171. Mak, M., de Vries, C., & Willems, R. M. (2020). The influence of mental imagery instructions and personality characteristics on reading experiences. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 43. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.281
  172. Marangolo, P., Bonifazi, S., Tomaiuolo, F., Craighero, L., Coccia, M., Altoè, G., … Cantagallo, A. (2010). Improving language without words: First evidence from aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 48(13), 38243833. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.025
  173. Marangolo, P., Cipollari, S., Fiori, V., Razzano, C., & Caltagirone, C. (2012). Walking but not barking improves verb recovery: Implications for action observation treatment in aphasia rehabilitation. PLOS ONE, 7(6), e38610. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038610
  174. Meier, B. (2013). Semantic representation of synaesthesia. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 125134. DOI: 10.12775/ths-2013-0006
  175. Meinzer, M., Darkow, R., Lindenberg, R., & Flöel, A. (2016). Electrical stimulation of the motor cortex enhances treatment outcome in post-stroke aphasia. Brain, 139(4), 11521163. DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww002
  176. Melloni, M., Sedeño, L., Hesse, E., García-Cordero, I., Mikulan, E., Plastino, A., … Ibáñez, A. (2015). Cortical dynamics and subcortical signatures of motor-language coupling in Parkinson’s disease. Scientific Reports, 5, 11899. DOI: 10.1038/srep11899
  177. Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788804. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
  178. Miklashevsky, A. (2018). Perceptual experience norms for 506 Russian nouns: Modality rating, spatial localization, manipulability, imageability and other variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 641661. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-017-9548-1
  179. Milton, F., Fulford, J., Dance, C., Gaddum, J., Heuerman-Williamson, B., Jones, K., … & Zeman, A. (2021). Behavioral and neural signatures of visual imagery vividness extremes: aphantasia versus hyperphantasia. Cerebral cortex Communications, 2(2), DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgab035
  180. Moguilner, S., Birba, A., Fino, D., Isoardi, R., Huetagoyena, C., Otoya, R., … García, A. M. (2021). Multimodal neurocognitive markers of frontal lobe epilepsy: Insights from ecological text processing. NeuroImage, 235, 117998. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117998
  181. Monaco, E., Jost, L. B., Gygax, P. M., & Annoni, J.-M. (2019). Embodied semantics in a second language: Critical review and clinical implications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00110
  182. Monaco, E., Jost, L. B., Lancheros, M., Harquel, S., Schmidlin, E., & Annoni, J.-M. (2021). First and second language at hand: A chronometric transcranial-magnetic stimulation study on semantic and motor resonance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(8), 15631580. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01736
  183. Moreno, I., de Vega, M., León, I., Bastiaansen, M., Glen Lewis, A., & Magyari, L. (2015). Brain dynamics in the comprehension of action-related language. A time-frequency analysis of mu rhythms. NeuroImage, 109, 5062. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.018
  184. Morey, R. D., Kaschak, M. P., Díez-Álamo, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., Zwaan, R. A., Lakens, D., … Ziv-Crispel, N. (2021). A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01927-8
  185. Muraki, E. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2021). Simulating semantics: Are individual differences in motor imagery related to sensorimotor effects in language processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Advance Online Publication. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001039
  186. Nedelska, Z., Laczo, J., Uller, M., Vyhnalek, M., Fripp, J., Vlcek, K., … Hort, J. (2017). Dementia with lewy bodies: Severe impairment of real-space navigation skills examined with human analogue of morris water maze and their structural underpinnings. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 381, 8384. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.08.283
  187. Neininger, B., & Pulvermüller, F. (2001). The right hemisphere’s role in action word processing: A double case study. Neurocase, 7(4), 303317. DOI: 10.1093/neucas/7.4.303
  188. Niessen, E., Fink, G. R., Schweitzer, L., Kluender, N., & Weiss, P. H. (2015). Implicit interactions between number and space in digit-color synesthesia. Cortex, 64, 225234. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.11.001
  189. Núñez, R. E., & Cornejo, C. (2012). Facing the sunrise: Cultural worldview underlying intrinsic-based encoding of absolute frames of reference in Aymara. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 965991. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01237.x
  190. Ochipa, C., Rapcsak, S. Z., Maher, L. M., Gonzalez Rothi, L. J., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1997). Selective deficit of praxis imagery in ideomotor apraxia. Neurology, 49(2), 474480. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.49.2.474
  191. Ong, N. T., Lohse, K. R., Chua, R., Sinnett, S., & Hodges, N. J. (2014). A test of motor skill-specific action embodiment in ice-hockey players. Acta Psychologica, 150, 6168. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.005
  192. Ortega, G., & Ostarek, M. (2021). Evidence for visual simulation during sign language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(10), 21582166. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001041
  193. Park, H. I. (2020). How do Korean–English bilinguals speak and think about motion events? Evidence from verbal and non-verbal tasks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(3), 483499. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728918001074
  194. Pavan, A., & Baggio, G. (2013). Linguistic representations of motion do not depend on the visual motion system. Psychological Science, 24(2), 181188. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612450882
  195. Pavlenko, A. (2003). Eyewitness memory in late bilinguals: Evidence for discursive relativity. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(3), 257281. DOI: 10.1177/13670069030070030301
  196. Pavlenko, A. (2009). Conceptual representation in the bilingual lexicon and second language vocabulary learning. The Bilingual Mental Lexicon: Interdisciplinary Approaches, 70. DOI: 10.21832/9781847691262-008
  197. Pavlenko, A. (2012). Affective processing in bilingual speakers: Disembodied cognition? International Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 405428. DOI: 10.1080/00207594.2012.743665
  198. Pearson, J., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015). The heterogeneity of mental representation: Ending the imagery debate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(33), 1008910092. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504933112
  199. Pearson, J., Naselaris, T., Holmes, E. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015). Mental imagery: Functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 590602. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.003
  200. Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language and thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968
  201. Pecher, D., van Dantzig, S., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2009). Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 914919. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.914
  202. Peigneux, P., & van der Linden, M. (1999). Influence of ageing and educational level on the prevalence of body-part-as-objects in normal subjects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(4), 547552. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.21.4.547.881
  203. Pérez-Gay Juárez, F., Labrecque, D., & Frak, V. (2019). Assessing language-induced motor activity through Event Related Potentials and the Grip Force Sensor, an exploratory study. Brain and Cognition, 135, 103572. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.010
  204. Picano, C., Quadrini, A., Pisano, F., & Marangolo, P. (2021). Adjunctive approaches to aphasia rehabilitation: A review on efficacy and safety. Brain Sciences, 11(1), 41. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010041
  205. Pineda, J. A. (2005). The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing.” Brain Research Reviews, 50(1), 5768. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.04.005
  206. Pisano, F., & Marangolo, P. (2020). Looking at ancillary systems for verb recovery: Evidence from non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain and Cognition, 139, 105515. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.105515
  207. Pitt, B., & Casasanto, D. (2020). The correlations in experience principle: How culture shapes concepts of time and number. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(6), 10481070. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000696
  208. Pulvermüller, F. (2013). Semantic embodiment, disembodiment or misembodiment? In search of meaning in modules and neuron circuits. Brain and Language, 127(1), 86103. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.015
  209. Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Neurobiological mechanisms for semantic feature extraction and conceptual flexibility. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(3), 590620. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12367
  210. Pulvermüller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(5), 351360. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2811
  211. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80(1), 124. DOI: 10.1037/h0034650
  212. Quesque, F., Coutrot, A., Cox, S., de Souza, L. C., Baez, S., Cardona, J. F., … Bertoux, M. (2020). Culture shapes our understanding of others’ thoughts and emotions: An investigation across 12 countries. Neuropsychology. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/tg2ay
  213. Ranzini, M., & Girelli, L. (2019). Colours + Numbers differs from colours of numbers: Cognitive and visual illusions in grapheme-colour synaesthesia. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(5), 15001511. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01685-9
  214. Reifegerste, J., Meyer, A. S., Zwitserlood, P., & Ullman, M. T. (2021). Aging affects steaks more than knives: Evidence that the processing of words related to motor skills is relatively spared in aging. Brain and Language, 218, 104941. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104941
  215. Reilly, J., Finley, A. M., Kelly, A., Zuckerman, B., & Flurie, M. (2021). Olfactory language and semantic processing in anosmia: A neuropsychological case control study. Neurocase, 27(1), 8696. DOI: 10.1080/13554794.2020.1871491
  216. Rich, A. N., Bradshaw, J. L., & Mattingley, J. B. (2005). A systematic, large-scale study of synaesthesia: Implications for the role of early experience in lexical-colour associations. Cognition, 98(1), 5384. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.003
  217. Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Markland, D., & Bringer, J. (2008). Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Sports & Exercise Psychology, 30, 200221. DOI: 10.1123/jsep.30.2.200
  218. Rodríguez-Ferreiro, J., Menéndez, M., Ribacoba, R., & Cuetos, F. (2009). Action naming is impaired in Parkinson disease patients. Neuropsychologia, 47(14), 32713274. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.007
  219. Rose, M. L., Attard, M. C., Mok, Z., Lanyon, L. E., & Foster, A. M. (2013). Multi-modality aphasia therapy is as efficacious as a constraint-induced aphasia therapy for chronic aphasia: A phase 1 study. Aphasiology, 27(8), 938971. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2013.810329
  220. Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Zysset, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Native and non-native reading of sentences: An fMRI experiment. NeuroImage, 31(1), 354365. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.047
  221. Russell, A., Stevenson, R. J., & Rich, A. N. (2015). Chocolate smells pink and stripy: Exploring olfactory-visual synesthesia. Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(2–3), 7788. DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1035245
  222. Salamone, P. C., Legaz, A., Sedeño, L., Moguilner, S., Fraile-Vazquez, M., Campo, C. G., … Ibañez, A. (2021). Interoception primes emotional processing: Multimodal evidence from neurodegeneration. The Journal of Neuroscience, 41(19), 42764292. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2578-20.2021
  223. Serino, S., Cipresso, P., Morganti, F., & Riva, G. (2014). The role of egocentric and allocentric abilities in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews, 16, 3244. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.04.004
  224. Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2018). Deconstructing spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 175, 109113. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.022
  225. Shebani, Z., & Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Flexibility in language action interaction: The influence of movement type. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00252. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00252
  226. Sheikh, N. A., & Titone, D. (2016). The embodiment of emotional words in a second language: An eye-movement study. Cognition and Emotion, 30(3), 488500. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018144
  227. Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R. (2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body-object interaction effect. Cognition, 106(1), 433443. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011
  228. Simonsen, H. G., Lind, M., Hansen, P., Holm, E., & Mevik, B.-H. (2013). Imageability of Norwegian nouns, verbs and adjectives in a cross-linguistic perspective. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(6–7), 435446. DOI: 10.3109/02699206.2012.752527
  229. Soliman, T., Gibson, A., & Glenberg, A. M. (2013). Sensory motor mechanisms unify psychology: The embodiment of culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00885
  230. Speed, L. J., Iravani, B., Lundström, J., & Majid, A. (2022). Losing the sense of smell does not disrupt processing of odor words. Available at SSRN 4026071. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4026071
  231. Speed, L. J., & Brysbaert, M. (2021). Dutch sensory modality norms. Behavior Research Methods. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01656-9
  232. Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods, 49(6), 22012218. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0852-3
  233. Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2018a). An exception to mental simulation: No evidence for embodied odor language. Cognitive Science, 42(4), 11461178. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12593
  234. Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2018b). Superior olfactory language and cognition in odor-color synaesthesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 44(3), 468481. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000469
  235. Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2020). Grounding language in the neglected senses of touch, taste, and smell. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 37(5–6), 363392. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2019.1623188
  236. Speed, L. J., van Dam, W. O., Hirath, P., Vigliocco, G., & Desai, R. H. (2017). Impaired comprehension of speed verbs in Parkinson’s Disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23(5), 412420. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617717000248
  237. Stahl, B., Mohr, B., Büscher, V., Dreyer, F. R., Lucchese, G., & Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Efficacy of intensive aphasia therapy in patients with chronic stroke: A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-315962
  238. Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153156. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00326
  239. Stietz, J., Jauk, E., Krach, S., & Kanske, P. (2019). Dissociating empathy from perspective-taking: Evidence from intra- and inter-individual differences research. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00126. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00126
  240. Suárez-García, D. M. A., Birba, A., Zimerman, M., Diazgranados, J. A., Lopes da Cunha, P., Ibáñez, A., … García, A. M. (2021). Rekindling action language: A neuromodulatory study on parkinson’s disease patients. Brain Sciences, 11(7), 887. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11070887
  241. Talmy, L. (1978). The relation of grammar to cognition: A synopsis. Proceedings of the 1978 Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, 1424. USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI: 10.3115/980262.980266
  242. Thurm, F., Schuck, N. W., Fauser, M., Doeller, C. F., Stankevich, Y., Evens, R., … Li, S.-C. (2016). Dopamine modulation of spatial navigation memory in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 38, 93103. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.10.019
  243. Tian, L., Chen, H., Zhao, W., Wu, J., Zhang, Q., De, A., … Parviainen, T. (2020). The role of motor system in action-related language comprehension in L1 and L2: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 201, 104714. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104714
  244. Tousignant, C., & Pexman, P. (2012). Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: Context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00053
  245. Trevisan, P., Sedeño, L., Birba, A., Ibáñez, A., & García, A. M. (2017). A moving story: Whole-body motor training selectively improves the appraisal of action meanings in naturalistic narratives. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12538. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12928-w
  246. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116(2), 185203. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.01.004
  247. Tuena, C., Mancuso, V., Stramba-Badiale, C., Pedroli, E., Stramba-Badiale, M., Riva, G., & Repetto, C. (2021). Egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in mild cognitive impairment with real-world and virtual navigation tasks: A systematic review. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 79(1), 95116. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-201017
  248. van Dam, W. O., van Dijk, M., Bekkering, H., & Rueschemeyer, S.-A. (2012). Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Human Brain Mapping, 33(10), 23222333. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21365
  249. Vergallito, A., Petilli, M. A., & Marelli, M. (2020). Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks. Behavior Research Methods, 52(4), 15991616. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01337-8
  250. Vukovic, N., & Shtyrov, Y. (2014). Cortical motor systems are involved in second-language comprehension: Evidence from rapid mu-rhythm desynchronisation. NeuroImage, 102(Part 2), 695703. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.039
  251. Vukovic, N., & Williams, J. N. (2015). Individual differences in spatial cognition influence mental simulation of language. Cognition, 142, 110122. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.017
  252. Wicken, M., Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2021). The critical role of mental imagery in human emotion: insights from fear-based imagery and aphantasia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1946), 20210267. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0267
  253. Willander, J., & Baraldi, S. (2010). Development of a new Clarity of Auditory Imagery Scale. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 785790. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.785
  254. Willems, R. M., Toni, I., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2009). Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(10), 23872400. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21386
  255. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625636. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196322
  256. Wolff, P., & Holmes, K. J. (2011). Linguistic relativity. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2(3), 253265. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.104
  257. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 489.
  258. Wu, H., Mai, X., Tang, H., Ge, Y., Luo, Y.-J., & Liu, C. (2013). Dissociable Somatotopic Representations of Chinese Action Verbs in the Motor and Premotor Cortex. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 2049. DOI: 10.1038/srep02049
  259. Yoris, A., Legaz, A., Abrevaya, S., Alarco, S., López Peláez, J., Sánchez, R., … Sedeño, L. (2020). Multicentric evidence of emotional impairments in hypertensive heart disease. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 14131. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70451-x
  260. Zeman, A., Milton, F., Della Sala, S., Dewar, M., Frayling, T., Gaddum, J., … Winlove, C. (2020). Phantasia-The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. Cortex, 130, 426440. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.003
  261. Zhang, X., Yang, J., Wang, R., & Li, P. (2020). A neuroimaging study of semantic representation in first and second languages. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 116. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1738509
  262. Zhong, Y., Wan, M., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R. (2022). Sensorimotor norms for Chinese nouns and their relationship with orthographic and semantic variables. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 123. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2035416
  263. Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 229234. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.008
  264. Zwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: Six replication attempts. PLoS One, 7(12), e51382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051382
  265. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162185. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
  266. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.228 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 8, 2022
|
Accepted on: May 20, 2022
|
Published on: Oct 10, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Agustín Ibáñez, Katharina Kühne, Alex Miklashevsky, Elisa Monaco, Emiko Muraki, Mariagrazia Ranzini, Laura J. Speed, Cosimo Tuena, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.