References
- Colzato, L. S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2006). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 705. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.705
- Dames, H., Kiesel, A., Ragni, M., & Pfeuffer, C. U. (2022, January). Analysis. Retrieved from
osf.io/2ky6p - Druey, M. D., & Hübner, R. (2008). Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: Evidence from repetition effects under task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(10), 1573–1600. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701643397
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., … & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Giesen, C., Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor–response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 373–387. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1
- Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2014). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: Experimental dissociations of distractor–response and distractor–target bindings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 645. DOI: 10.1037/a0035278
- Giesen, C. G., Schmidt, J. R., & Rothermund, K. (2020). The law of recency: An episodic stimulus-response retrieval account of habit acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,
Article 2927 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927 - Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216. DOI: 10.1080/713756773
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(11), 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B., Memelink, J., Zmigrod, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2014). Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus–response bindings. Psychological Research, 78(4), 520–538. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0503-y
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and brain sciences, 24(5), 849–878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2009). Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 757–779. DOI: 10.1037/a0015262
- Hsu, Y. F., & Waszak, F. (2012). Stimulus– classification traces are dominant in response learning. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86, 262–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.002
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
- Longman, C. S., Milton, F., Wills, A. J., & Verbruggen, F. (2018). Transfer of learned category-response associations is modulated by instruction. Acta Psychologica, 184, 144–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.004
- Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1423–1442. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2017). Dissociation of binding and learning processes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(8), 2590–2605. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1393-7
- Moeller, B., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Frings, C. (2016). A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 1074–1086. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1
- Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Jamil, T., & Morey, M. R. D. (2015). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs. Retrieved from
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/index.html - Moutsopoulou, K., Pfeuffer, C., Kiesel, A., Yang, Q., & Waszak, F. (2019). How long is long-term priming? Classification and action priming in the scale of days. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1183–1199. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818784261
- Moutsopoulou, K., Yang, Q., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2015). Stimulus– classification and stimulus–action associations: Effects of repetition learning and durability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 68, 1744–1757. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984232
- Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 45–100. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51002-X
- Oberauer, K., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Gade, M. (2013). Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: Experiments and a computational model. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 157–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.11.001
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Hosp, T., Kimmig, E., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2018a). Defining stimulus representation in stimulus–response associations formed on the basis of task execution and verbal codes. Psychological Research, 82(4), 744–758. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0861-y
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Pfister, R., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2017). The power of words: On item-specific stimulus–response associations formed in the absence of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(2), 328. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000317
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2018b). Multiple priming instances increase the impact of practice-based but not verbal code-based stimulus-response associations. Acta Psychologica, 184, 100–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.001
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Execution-based and verbal code-based stimulus–response associations: proportion manipulations reveal conflict adaptation processes in item-specific priming. Psychological Research, 84, 2172–2195. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01220-3
- Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
- Schmidt, J. R., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(5), 739–761. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820906397
- Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and longterm priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
- Whitehead, P. S., Pfeuffer, C. U., & Egner, T. (in press). Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings. Journal of Cognition.