Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What Belongs Together Retrieves Together – The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval Cover

What Belongs Together Retrieves Together – The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. Alais, D., Blake, R., & Lee, S. H. (1998). Visual features that vary together over time group together over space. Nature Neuroscience, 1(2), 160164. DOI: 10.1038/414
  2. Allen, M., Poggiali, D., Whitaker, K., Marshall, T. R., & Kievit, R. A. (2019). Raincloud plots: A multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Research, 4, 63. DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1
  3. Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 379384. DOI: 10.3758/BF03192707
  4. Beck, D. M., & Palmer, S. E. (2002). Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 10711084. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.5.1071
  5. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523547. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
  6. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193222. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
  7. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
  8. Fournier, L. R., & Gallimore, J. M. (2013). What makes an event: Temporal integration of stimuli or actions? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(6), 12931305. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0461-x
  9. Fournier, L. R., Hansen, D. A., Stubblefield, A. M., & van Dongen, H. P. A. (2020). Action plan interrupted: Resolution of proactive interference while coordinating execution of multiple action plans during sleep deprivation. Psychological Research PRPF, 84(2), 454467. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1054-z
  10. Frings, C., & Hommel, B. (2020). The disintegration of event files over time: Decay or interference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(4), 751757. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01738-3
  11. Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2012). The horserace between distractors and targets: Retrieval-based probe responding depends on distractor–target asynchrony. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 582590. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2012.666852
  12. Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be…Included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 12091227. DOI: 10.1037/a0023915
  13. Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
  14. Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 60(10), 13671377. DOI: 10.1080/17470210600955645
  15. Geissler, C. F., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2021). Illuminating the prefrontal neural correlates of action sequence disassembling in response-response binding. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 22856. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02247-6
  16. Henson, R. N., Eckstein, D., Waszak, F., Frings, C., & Horner, A. J. (2014). Stimulus-response bindings in priming. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 376384. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.004
  17. Hommel, B. (1998). Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183216. DOI: 10.1080/713756773
  18. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
  19. Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73(4), 512526. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2
  20. Hommel, B. (2022). The Control of event file Management. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), Article 1. DOI: 10.5334/joc.187
  21. Hommel, B., Memelink, J., Zmigrod, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2014). Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings. Psychological Research PRPF, 78(4), 520538. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0503-y
  22. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 84978; discussion 878–937. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
  23. Ihrke, M., Behrendt, J., Schrobsdorff, H., Michael Herrmann, J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2011). Response-retrieval and negative priming. Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 154161. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000081
  24. Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1). DOI: 10.7771/1932-6246.1167
  25. Laub, R., & Frings, C. (2020). Distractor-based retrieval in action control: The influence of encoding specificity. Psychological Research, 84(3), 765773. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1082-8f
  26. Laub, R., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2018). Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 14741488. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-1526-7
  27. Lawrence, M. A. (2016). Package ‘ez’. ftp://163.178.174.25/cran/web/packages/ez/ez.pdf
  28. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492527. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
  29. Mattson, P. S., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 12361247. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1236
  30. Mattson, P. S., Fournier, L. R., & Behmer, L. P. (2012). Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(7), 14461460. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0335-7
  31. McGill, R., Tukey, J. W., & Larsen, W. A. (1978). Variations of Box Plots. The American Statistician. DOI: 10.2307/2683468
  32. Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77(3), 249259. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
  33. Mocke, V., Weller, L., Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Kunde, W. (2020). Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(8), 38113831. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02123-x
  34. Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2016). The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(4), 464479. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000158
  35. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 6164. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
  36. Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R Package Version 0.9.12-. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/index.html
  37. Palmer, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 436447. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90014-S
  38. Palmer, S. E., & Beck, D. M. (2007). The repetition discrimination task: An objective method for studying perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(1), 6878. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194454
  39. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
  40. Peirce, J., & MacAskill, M. (2018). Building Experiments in PsychoPy. SAGE.
  41. Phaf, R. H., & Wolters, G. (1997). A constructivist and connectionist view on conscious and nonconscious processes. Philosophical Psychology, 10(3), 287307. DOI: 10.1080/09515089708573221
  42. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and Action Planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129154. DOI: 10.1080/713752551
  43. R Core Team. (2019). A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012.
  44. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225237. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
  45. Schmalbrock, P., & Frings, C. (Manuscript submitted for publication). A mighty tool not only in perception: figure-ground mechanisms control binding and retrieval alike.
  46. Schmalbrock, P., & Frings, C. (2021). Temporal expectancy modulates Stimulus-Response Integration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (pp. 110). DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02361-7
  47. Schmalbrock, P., Laub, R., & Frings, C. (2021). Integrating Salience and Action – Increased Integration Strength through Salience. Visual Cognition, advanced online publication. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1871455
  48. Shibuya, H., & Bundesen, C. (1988). Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(4), 591. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.591
  49. Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 943. DOI: 10.1037/a0020541
  50. Singh, T., & Frings, C. (2020). The role of location in the organization of bindings within short-term episodic traces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(5), 512524. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000729
  51. Singh, T., & Schubert, T. (2021). The Influence of Cognitive Load on Distractor-Response Bindings. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 696353. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696353
  52. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 16251640. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1625
  53. Theeuwes, J., & Failing, M. (2020). Attentional Selection. Elements in Perception. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1017/9781108891288
  54. Treisman, A., & Zhang, W. (2006). Location and binding in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 34(8), 17041719. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195932
  55. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
  56. Vecera, S. P. (2000). Toward a Biased Competition Account of Object-Based Segregation and Attention. Brain and Mind, 1(3), 353384. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011565623996
  57. Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & Heydt, R. von der (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 11721217. DOI: 10.1037/a0029333
  58. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/BF00410385
  59. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., & Müller, K. (2019). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R Package Version 0.8.3. https://cran.r-project.org/package=dplyr
  60. Wolters, G., & Raffone, A. (2001). How are events represented? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 908909. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01500102
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.217 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 12, 2021
|
Accepted on: Mar 14, 2022
|
Published on: Apr 12, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Philip Schmalbrock, Andrea Kiesel, Christian Frings, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.