Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Binding Error-Induced Control States Cover

Binding Error-Induced Control States

Open Access
|Apr 2022

Figures & Tables

joc-5-1-213-g1.png
Figure 1

Exemplary trial sequence with proposed control state changes, and hypothesized binding and retrieval processes. We examined sequences of three trials to probe for binding and retrieval of error-induced control states. On each trial, participants responded with a left or right response to a target letter that was surrounded by irrelevant letters. The arrangement of letters corresponds to the design of the Confirmatory Experiment. Stimuli are not drawn to scale for legibility. Assumed representations of the features of an action episode are shown as circles. Binding is illustrated through lines between feature representations and retrieval through arrows. In trial n–2, a commission error (orange) should lead to increased control (Ctrl) in comparison to correct responses (grey). The resulting control state then binds to the presented stimuli (S) in trial n–1 as do features of the executed correct response (R). A repetition of the relevant stimulus in trial n is assumed to retrieve the previously bound control state and response (top), whereas retrieval does not take place for stimulus changes (bottom).

Table 1

Descriptive data of Reanalysis 1. Means and standard deviations (in brackets) of response times in n (RT) and n–1 (RTn–1) and of the percentage of commission errors for each analysis cell.

RESPONSE IN N–2CONDITION SEQUENCE IN N–1CONDITION SEQUENCE IN NRT [MS]ERRORS [%]RTN–1[MS]
CorrectTarget change | correct response changeTarget repetition | correct response repetition386 (34)3.2 (3.3)455 (21)
Target change | correct response repetition417 (34)13.1 (5.9)
ErrorTarget repetition | correct response repetition394 (63)2.6 (5.0)443 (49)
Target change | correct response repetition426 (50)8.8 (10.9)
joc-5-1-213-g2.png
Figure 2

Mean response times of Reanalysis 1 and 2. Mean response times as a function of the response in n–2 (correct in black, error in bright orange) and whether correct response repetitions had to be executed for target repetitions or target changes in (A) Reanalysis 1 and (B) Reanalysis 2 for which we averaged over feedback conditions here. Error bars represent the standard error of the differences, separately computed for correct and erroneous responses in n–2.

Table 2

Descriptive data of Reanalysis 2. Means and standard deviations (in brackets) of response times in n (RT) and n–1 (RTn–1) and of the percentage of commission errors for each analysis cell.

FEEDBACKRESPONSE IN N–2CONDITION SEQUENCE FROM N–2 TO N–1CONDITION SEQUENCE FROM N–1 TO NRT [MS]ERRORS [%]RTN–1 [MS]
AbsentCorrectTarget change | correct response changeTarget repetition | correct response repetition404 (24)4.4 (4.3)453 (29)
Target change | correct response repetition441 (32)13.1 (6.6)
ErrorTarget repetition | correct response repetition417 (27)4.5 (5.9)444 (35)
Target change | correct response repetition435 (37)13.2 (11.6)
PresentCorrectTarget repetition | correct response repetition406 (27)4.7 (4.7)460 (27)
Target change | correct response repetition446 (22)20.7 (12.3)
ErrorTarget repetition | correct response repetition415 (36)5.6 (7.2)462 (33)
Target change | correct response repetition440 (44)11.8 (10.3)
Table 3

Descriptive data of Reanalysis 3. Means and standard deviations (in parentheses) of response times (RTs) and of the percentage of commission errors for each analysis cell.

RESPONSE IN N–1CONDITION SEQUENCE IN NRT [MS]ERRORS [%]
CorrectTarget change | correct response change to neutral566 (22)19.2 (6.3)
ErrorTarget change | correct response change to neutral590 (24)22.2 (11.1)
Target change | correct response change to erroneous570 (29)21.3 (12.1)
Table 4

Descriptive data of the main analyses for the Confirmatory Experiment. Means and standard deviations (in brackets) of response times in n (RT) and n–1 (RTn–1) and of the percentage of commission errors for each analysis cell.

RESPONSE IN N–2CONDITION SEQUENCE FROM N–2 TO N–1CONDITION SEQUENCE FROM N–1 TO NRT [MS] UNMATCHED MATCHEDERRORS [%]RTN–1 [MS]: UNMATCHED MATCHED
CorrectTarget change | correct response changeTarget repetition | correct response repetition501 (39)
504 (39)
6.1 (3.9)521 (35)
531 (36)
Target change | correct response repetition523 (36)
525 (36)
14.5 (7.3)
ErrorTarget repetition | correct response repetition507 (39)
507 (39)
5.0 (4.9)530 (36)
530 (36)
Target change | correct response repetition523 (35)
523 (35)
12.0 (8.2)
joc-5-1-213-g3.png
Figure 3

Mean response times of the Confirmatory Experiment. Mean response times as a function of the response in n–2 (correct in black, error in bright orange) and whether correct response repetitions had to be executed for target repetitions or target changes in the Confirmatory Experiment for (A) unmatched data and (B) data that was matched for effects of the response in n–2 on RTn–1. Error bars represent the standard error of the differences, separately computed for correct and erroneous responses in n–2.

Table 5

Descriptive data of explorative analyses for the Confirmatory Experiment. Means and standard deviations (in brackets) of response times in n (RT) and n–1 (RTn–1) and of the percentage of commission errors for each analysis cell.

RTN–1RESPONSE IN N–2CONDITION SEQUENCE FROM N–2 TO N–1CONDITION SEQUENCE FROM N–1 TO NRT [MS]RTN–1 [MS]
ShortCorrectTarget change | correct response changeTarget repetition | correct response repetition488 (39)472 (36)
Target change | correct response repetition515 (36)
ErrorTarget repetition | correct response repetition496 (39)480 (37)
Target change | correct response repetition512 (38)
LongCorrectTarget change | correct response changeTarget repetition | correct response repetition514 (39)569 (35)
Target change | correct response repetition532 (37)
ErrorTarget repetition | correct response repetition519 (44)579 (38)
Target change | correct response repetition533 (41)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.213 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 2, 2021
|
Accepted on: Feb 24, 2022
|
Published on: Apr 7, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Anna Foerster, Moritz Schiltenwolf, David Dignath, Roland Pfister, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.