References
- Bernier, P. M., Cieslak, M., & Grafton, S. T. (2012). Effector selection precedes reach planning in the dorsal parietofrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(1), 57–68. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00011.2012
- Bogon, J., Thomaschke, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). Binding time: Evidence for integration of temporal stimulus features. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 79(5), 1290–1296. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1330-9
- Butterfill, S. A., & Sinigaglia, C. (2014). Intention and motor representation in purposive action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(1), 119–145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00604.x
- Cox, R. F., & Hasselman, F. (2013). The case of Watson vs. James: effect-priming studies do not support ideomotor theory. PLoS One, 8(1),
e54094 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054094 - Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford University Press.
- Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Huffman, G., Kunde, W., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2021a). The human cognitive system corrects traces of error commission on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001139
- Foerster, A., Rothermund, K., Parmar, J. J., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2021b). Goal-based binding of irrelevant stimulus features for action slips. Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 206–213. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000525
- Foerster, A., Steinhauser, M., Schwarz, K. A., Kunde, W., & Pfister, R. (in press). Error cancellation. Royal Society Open Science. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.210397
- Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., & Taddese, E. F. (2015). Action plans can interact to hinder or facilitate reach performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8), 2755–2767. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0959-5
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Frings, C., Moeller, B., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75(4), 700–709. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0431-3
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(10), 1367–1377. DOI: 10.1080/17470210600955645
- Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2002). Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 146(3), 383–387. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1222-6
- Gu, J., Li, Y., Zhao, K., & Fu, X. (2021). Disappearing and appearing: Temporal binding effects are consistent across situations. Consciousness and Cognition, 93, 103166. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103166
- Harleß, E. (1848). Physiologische Beobachtung und Experiment – Eine methodologische Skizze. Bauer und Raspe.
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1–2), 183–216. DOI: 10.1080/713756773
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2011). Stimulus–response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation. Memory & Cognition, 39(8), 1457–1471. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0118-8
- Horváth, J., Bíró, B., & Neszmélyi, B. (2018). Action-effect related motor adaptation in interactions with everyday devices. Scientific Reports, 8(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25161-w
- Kunde, W. (2003). Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research, 67(3), 153–159. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0114-5
- Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57A(1), 87–106. DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000143
- Kunde, W., & Stöcker, C. (2002). A Simon effect for stimulus response duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 55(A), 581–592. DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000433
- Lepora, N. F., & Pezzulo, G. (2015). Embodied choice: How action influences perceptual decision making. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(4),
e1004110 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004110 - Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
- Mocke, V., Holzmann, P., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (in press). Beyond left and right: Binding and retrieval of spatial and temporal features of planned actions. Journal of Cognition.
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019). From simple to complex actions: Response–response bindings as a new approach to action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 174–183. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000483
- Moeller, B., Pfister, R., Kunde, W., & Frings, C. (2016). A common mechanism behind distractor-response and response-effect binding? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 1074–1086. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1063-1
- Moutsopoulou, K., Pfeuffer, C., Kiesel, A., Yang, Q., & Waszak, F. (2019). How long is long-term priming? Classification and action priming in the scale of days. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 1183–1199. DOI: 10.1177/1747021818784261
- Pacherie, E. (2011). Nonconceptual representations for action and the limits of intentional control. Social Psychology, 42(1), 67–73. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000044
- Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. C. (1991). Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 33–48. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.1.33
- Pfeuffer, C. U., Hosp, T., Kimmig, E., Moutsopoulou, K., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Defining stimulus representation in stimulus–response associations formed on the basis of task execution and verbal codes. Psychological Research, 82(4), 744–758. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0861-y
- Pfister, R. (2019). Effect-based action control with body-related effects: Implications for empirical approaches to ideomotor action control. Psychological Review, 126(1), 153–161. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000140
- Pfister, R., & Foerster, A. (2021). How to measure post-error slowing: The case of pre-error speeding. Behavior Research Methods. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01631-4
- Pfister, R., Heinemann, A., Kiesel, A., Thomaschke, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Do endogenous and exogenous action control compete for perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 279–284. DOI: 10.1037/a0026658
- Philipp, A. M., Jolicoeur, P., Falkenstein, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(6), 1062–1075. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1062
- Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 92–105. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.92
- Shepherd, J. (2019). Skilled action and the double life of intention. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 98(2), 286–305. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12433
- Thomaschke, R., Hopkins, B., & Miall, R. C. (2012). The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: Reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects. Psychological Review, 119(2), 388–407. DOI: 10.1037/a0027453
- Wiediger, M. D., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: The generalization of response compatibility interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1136–1149. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1136