References
- 1Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(4), 578–602. DOI: 10.3758/BF03200738
- 2Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193014
- 3Bates, D., Sarkar, D., Bates, M. D., & Matrix, L. (2007). The lme4 package. R package version, 2(1), 74. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- 4Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
- 5Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2021). Frequency effects in reading are powerful–But is contextual diversity the more important variable? Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(12). DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12444
- 6Cevoli, B., Watkins, C., & Rastle, K. (2021). What is semantic diversity and why does it facilitate visual word recognition?. Behavior Research Methods, 53(1), 247–263. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01440-1
- 7Colombo, L., & Burani, C. (2002). The influence of age of acquisition, root frequency, and context availability in processing nouns and verbs. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 398–411. DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2533
- 8Cortese, M. J., & Fugett, A. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 384–387. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195585
- 9Hills, T. T., Maouene, J., Riordan, B., & Smith, L. B. (2010). The associative structure of language: Contextual diversity in early word learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 259–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.002
- 10Hoffman, P., Ralph, M. A. L., & Rogers, T. T. (2013). Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 718–730. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x
- 11Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2021). Semantic diversity is best measured with unscaled vectors: Reply to Cevoli, Watkins and Rastle (2020). Behavior Research Methods, 1–13. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01693-4
- 12Hsiao, Y., Bird, M., Norris, H., Pagán, A., & Nation, K. (2020). The influence of item-level contextual history on lexical and semantic judgments by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(12), 2367–2383. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000795
- 13Johns, B. T. (2021). Distributional social semantics: Inferring word meanings from communication patterns. Cognitive Psychology, 131. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101441
- 14Johns, B. T., Gruenenfelder, T. M., Pisoni, D. B., & Jones, M. N. (2012). Effects of word frequency, contextual diversity, and semantic distinctiveness on spoken word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), 74–80. DOI: 10.1121/1.4731641
- 15Johns, B. T., & Jones, M. N. (2022). Content matters: Measures of contextual diversity must consider semantic content. Journal of Memory and Language, 123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2021.104313
- 16Keuleers, E., & Balota, D. A. (2015). Megastudies, crowdsourcing, and large datasets in psycholinguistics: An overview of recent developments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1457–1468. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1051065
- 17Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
- 18Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
- 19Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). Package ‘lmertest’. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- 20Moffat, M., Siakaluk, P. D., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 408–419. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0696-0
- 21Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17(C), 22–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
- 22Pexman, P. M. (2020). How does meaning come to mind? Four broad principles of semantic processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 74(4), 275. DOI: 10.1037/cep0000235
- 23Revelle, W. R. (2017).
psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research . Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University. R package version 2.1.9,https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych . - 24Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W.-M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 96–104. DOI: 10.3758/BF03208259
- 25Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499–520. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8
- 26Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Noyes, C. R. (1996). Context availability and the development of word reading skill. Journal of Literacy Research, 28(1), 35–54. DOI: 10.1080/10862969609547909
- 27Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Davis, C. J. (2006). The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 598–605. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193891
- 28Tillotson, S. M., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2008). Body—object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1075–1078. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1075
- 29Van Hell, J., & De Groot, A. M. (1998). Disentangling context availability and concreteness in lexical decision and word translation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 51(1), 41–63. DOI: 10.1080/713755752
- 30Van Heuven, W. J., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
- 31Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
- 32Yap, M. J., Lim, G. Y., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback. Memory & Cognition, 43(8), 1148–1167. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0536-0