References
-
1
Eysenck M. W. Editorial European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1989 1 1 2 10.1080/09541448908403068
-
2
Francis G. Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2012 19 151 156 10.3758/s13423-012-0227-9
-
3
Morey R. D. Chambers C. D. Etchells P. J. Harris C. R. Hoekstra R. Lakens D. Lewandowsky S. Morey C. C. Newman D. P. Schönbrodt F. D. Vanpaemel W. Wagenmakers E. J. Zwaan R. A. The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review Royal Society Open Science 2016 3 1 10.1098/rsos.150547 150547
-
4
Open Science Collaboration Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Science 2015 349 10.1126/science.aac4716 aac4716
-
5
Prinz W. Perception and action planning European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997 9 129 154 10.1080/713752551
-
6
Simmons J. Nelson L. D. Simonsohn U. False-Positive Psychology Psychological Science 2011 22 1359 1366 10.1177/0956797611417632
-
7
Sorokowski P. Kulczycki E. Sorokowska A. Pisanki K. Predatory journals recruit fake editor Nature 2017 543 481 483 10.1038/543481a
-
8
TOP guidelines
https://cos.io/our-services/top-guidelines/ -
9
Vanpaemel W. Vermorgen M. Deriemaecker L. Storms G. Are We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm Collabra 2015 1 10.1525/collabra.13 Art. 3
-
10
Wagenmakers E. J. A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007 14 779 804 10.3758/BF03194105