References
- Bogon, J., Thomaschke, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). Binding time: Evidence for integration of temporal stimulus features. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(5), 1290–1296. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1330-9
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- Fournier, L. R., Behmer, L. P., & Stubblefield, A. M. (2014). Interference due to shared features between action plans is influenced by working memory span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1524–1529. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0627-0
- Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., McMeans, R., Mattson, P. S., Kirkwood, J., & Herzog, T. (2010). Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response. Psychological Research PRPF, 74(4), 359–369. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0256-9
- Fournier, L. R., Wiediger, M. D., & Taddese, E. F. (2015). Action plans can interact to hinder or facilitate reach performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8), 2755–2767. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0959-5
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–937. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1–17. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
- JASP Team. (2019). JASP (Version 0.10.2) [Computer software].
- Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of Probability (3rd ed.). Clarendon Press.
- Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 175–219. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O
- Klapp, S. T., & Jagacinski, R. J. (2011). Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 443–462. DOI: 10.1037/a0022361
- Kunde, W. (2003). Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research, 67(3), 153–159. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0114-5
- Kunde, W., & Stöcker, C. (2002). A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55(2), 581–592. DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000433
- Lépine, D., Glencross, D., & Requin, J. (1989). Some experimental evidence for and against a parametric conception of movement programming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 347–362. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.347
- Liesefeld, H. R., & Janczyk, M. (2019). Combining speed and accuracy to control for speed-accuracy trade-offs(?). Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 40–60. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1076-x
- Mattson, P. S., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 1236–1247. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1236
- Mattson, P. S., Fournier, L. R., & Behmer, L. P. (2012). Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(7), 1446–1460. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0335-7
- Mocke, V., Holzmann, P., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2021, July 28). Temporal Features in Action Planning. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7QYH4
- Mocke, V., Weller, L., Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Kunde, W. (2020). Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02123-x
- Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in cognitive psychology, 9(2), 74–80. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0133-x
- Rickham, P. P. (1964). Human experimentation. Code of ethics of the world medical association. Declaration of Helsinki. British Medical Journal, 2, 177. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5402.177
- Rosenbaum, D. A. (1985).
Motor programming: A review and scheduling theory . In H. Heuer, U. Kleinbeck, & K.-M. Schmidt (Eds.), Motor behavior: Programming, control, and acquisition (pp. 1–33). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-69749-4_1 - Rosenbaum, D. A. (1987). Successive approximations to a model of human motor programming. The psychology of learning and motivation, 21, 153–182. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60028-6
- Stinear, C. M., Walker, K. S., & Byblow, W. D. (2001). Symmetric facilitation between motor cortices during contraction of ipsilateral hand muscles. Experimental Brain Research, 139(1), 101–105. DOI: 10.1007/s002210100758
- Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1625–1640. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1625
- Vallesi, A., Mapelli, D., Schiff, S., Amodio, P., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? Cognition, 96(1), B33–B43. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.009
- Vandierendonck, A. (2021). On the Utility of Integrated Speed-Accuracy Measures when Speed-Accuracy Trade-off is Present. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 22–22. DOI: 10.5334/joc.154
- Wiediger, M. D., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: The generalization of response compatibility interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1136–1149. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1136
- Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 453–464. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.453