References
- Akyürek, E. G., & Hommel, B. (2005). Target integration and the Attentional Blink. Acta Psychologica, 119, 305–314. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.02.006
- Akyürek, E. G., Riddell, P. M., Toffanin, P., & Hommel, B. (2007). Adaptive control of event integration: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 44, 383–391. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00513.x
- Akyürek, E. G., Toffanin, P., & Hommel, B. (2008). Adaptive control of event integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 569–577. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.569
- Barker, R. G. (1963).
The stream of behavior: Explorations of its structure and content . New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. DOI: 10.1037/11177-000 - Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211–227.
- Botvinick, M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 201–208.
- Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2004). Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. Psychological Review, 111, 395–429.
- Brebner, J., Shephard, M., & Cairney, P. (1972). Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 36, 1–15.
- Cisek, P., & Turgeon, M. (1999). Binding through the fovea: A tale of perception in the service ofaction. Psyche, 5. Retrieved from
http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v5/psyche-5-34-cisek.html - Colzato, L. S., Erasmus, V., & Hommel, B. (2004). Moderate alcohol consumption in humans impairs feature binding in visual perception but not across perception and action. Neuroscience Letters, 360, 103–105.
- Colzato, L. S., Fagioli, S., Erasmus, V., & Hommel, B. (2005). Caffeine, but not nicotine enhances visual feature binding. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 591–595.
- Colzato, L. S., van Wouwe, N. C., Lavender, T. J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Intelligence and cognitive flexibility: Fluid intelligence correlates with feature “unbinding” across perception and action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1043–1048.
- Colzato, L. S., Warrens, M. J., & Hommel, B. (2006). Priming and binding in and across perception and action: A correlational analysis of the internal structure of event files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1785–1804.
- Danziger, K. (1997).
Naming the mind: How psychology found its language . London: Sage. - De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1998). An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 45–61.
- Dennett, D. C. (1991).
Consciousness explained . Little, Brown & Co. - Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.
- DeYoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 219–226.
- Dutzi, I. B., & Hommel, B. (2009). The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychological Research, 73, 425–435.
- Eder, A. B., & Hommel, B. (2013). Anticipatory control of approach and avoidance: An ideomotor approach. Emotion Review, 5, 275–279.
- Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation–behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235.
- Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598–601.
- Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 375–387.
- Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2011). To be or not to be…included in an event file: Integration and retrieval of distractors in stimulus-response episodes is influenced by perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37, 1209–1227.
- Frings, C., & Rothermund, K. (2017). How perception guides action: figure-ground segmentation modulates integration of context features into S-R episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1720–1729.
- Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2007). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1367–1377.
- Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2014). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets. Experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 645–659.
- Harless, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50–73.
- Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.
- Hommel, B. (2002). Responding to object files: Automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus-response compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 567–580.
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500.
- Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1067–1082.
- Hommel, B. (2007). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research, 71, 42–63.
- Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526.
- Hommel, B. (2017).
Goal-directed actions . In: M. Waldmann (ed.), Handbook of causal reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.18. - Hommel, B. (2021). GOALITH: A theory of goal-directed behavior. Submitted.
- Hommel, B., Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Feature integration across the lifespan: Stickier stimulus-response bindings in children and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 268.
- Hommel, B., Li, Z. H., & Li, S.-C. (2004). Visual search across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 40, 545–558.
- Hommel, B., Memelink, J., Zmigrod, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2014). Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings. Psychological Research, 78, 520–538.
- Hommel, B., & Müsseler, J. (2006). Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 509–523.
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.
- Hommel, B., Pösse, B., & Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 227–245.
- Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392–420.
- Hommel, B., & Wiers, R. W. (2017). Towards a unitary approach to human action control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 940–949.
- James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188–205.
- Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219.
- Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
- Keizer, A. W., Colzato, L. S., & Hommel, B. (2008a). Integrating faces, houses, motion, and action: Spontaneous binding across ventral and dorsal processing streams. Acta Psychologica, 127, 177–185.
- Keizer, A. W., Nieuwenhuis, S., Colzato, L. S., Theeuwisse, W., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Hommel, B. (2008b). When moving faces activate the house area: an fMRI study of object file retrieval. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4, 50.
- Keizer, A. W., Verment, R., & Hommel, B. (2010a). Enhancing cognitive control through neurofeedback: A role of gamma-band activity in managing episodic retrieval. Neuroimage, 49, 3404–3413.
- Keizer, A. W., Verschoor, M., Verment, R., & Hommel, B. (2010b). The effect of gamma enhancing neurofeedback on measures of feature-binding flexibility and intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 25–32.
- Koechlin, E., Ody, C., & Kouneiher, F. (2003). The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science, 302(5648), 1181–1185.
- Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
- Laub, R., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2018). Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1474–1488.
- Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270–1296.
- Li, S.-C., Lindenberger, U., Hommel, B., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W., & Baltes, P. B. (2004). Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span. Psychological Science, 15, 155–163.
- Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 932–943.
- Mayr, S., Moeller, M., & Buchner, A. (2011). Evidence of vocal and manual event files in auditory negative priming. Experimental Psychology, 58, 353–360.
- Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259.
- Mocke, V., Weller, L., Frings, C., Rothermund, K., & Kunde, W. (2020). Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 3811–3831.
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2019). From simple to complex actions: Response-response bindings as a new approach to action sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 174–183.
- Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.
- Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
- Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28–38.
- Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436–450.
- Pösse, B., Waszak, F., & Hommel, B. (2006). Do stimulus-response bindings survive a task switch? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 640–651.
- Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
- Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., et al. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
- Schmalbrock, P., Laub, R., & Frings, C. (2021). Integrating salience and action: Increased integration strength through salience. Visual Cognition, 29, 91–104.
- Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259–290.
- Schumacher, E. H., & Hazeltine, E. (2016). Hierarchical task representation: Task files and response selection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 449–454.
- Singer, W. (1994).
The organization of sensory motor representations in the neocortex: a hypothesis based on temporal coding . In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (eds.), Conscious and nonconscious information processing: Attention and Performance XV (pp. 77–107). MIT Press. - Singh, T., Frings, C., & Moeller, B. (2017). Binding abstract concepts. Psychological Research, 83, 878–888.
- Spapé, M., & Hommel, B. (2008). He said, she said: Episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1117–1121.
- Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625–1640.
- Stränger, J., & Hommel, B. (1996).
The perception of action and movement . In W. Prinz, & B. Bridgeman (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action, 1, 397–451. London: Academic Press. - Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178.
- Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
- Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (2012).
Action identification theory . In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (eds), Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1, 327–348. London: Sage. - van Dam, W. O., & Hommel, B. (2010). How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1184–1192.
- Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Modularity and attention. Visual Cognition, 2, 269–302.
- Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.
- Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 273–293.
- Zmigrod, S., Colzato, L. S., & Hommel, B. (2014). Evidence for a role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in controlling stimulus-response integration: A transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) study. Brain Stimulation, 7, 516–520.
- Zmigrod, S., de Sonneville, L. M. J., Colzato, L. S., Swaab, H., & Hommel, B. (2013). Cognitive control of feature bindings: Evidence from children with autistic spectrum disorder. Psychological Research, 77, 147–154.
- Zmigrod, S., Spapé, M., & Hommel, B. (2009). Intermodal event files: Integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action. Psychological Research, 73, 674–684.