Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effects of Prior-Task Success on Young and Older Adults’ Cognitive Performance an Evaluation of the Strategy Hypothesis Cover

Effects of Prior-Task Success on Young and Older Adults’ Cognitive Performance an Evaluation of the Strategy Hypothesis

By: Patrick Lemaire and  Fleur Brun  
Open Access
|Feb 2018

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Participants’ characteristics (Expt. 1).

CharacteristicsYoung adultsOlder adults
Control conditionSuccess conditionFControl conditionSuccess conditionF
N (females)23 (11)23 (14)23 (15)23 (13)
Mean age (years ; months)24;623;11.6971;070;00.26
Age range18;0–32;018;0–30;059;2–84;461;0–83;0
Number of years of education11.511.70.211.911.8.14
Arithmetic fluency (SD)59.7 (12.1)60.0 (15.9)0.0069.6 (9.0)70.7 (13.1)0.12
MHVS1 (SD)24.4 (4.8)23.2 (4.8)0.7424.0 (2.3)24.5 (4.6)0.58
MMSE229.029.1

[i] Note. 1Mill-Hill Vocabulary Scale, 2Mini-Mental State Examination.

Table 2

Mean percentages of better strategy selection, mean estimation times, and percentages of errors in young and older adults under the success and control conditions for rounding-down and rounding-up prime problems (Expt. 1).

Problem TypeYoung adultsOlder adultsMeans
ControlSuccessDifferencesMeansControlSuccessDifferencesMeansControlSuccessDifferencesMeans
Percentages of Better Strategy Selection
Rounding-Down96.297.8–1.697.097.898.1–0.398.097.098.0–1.097.5
Rounding-Up98.494.83.596.692.793.8–1.193.295.594.31.294.9
Means97.396.31.096.895.295.9–0.795.696.396.10.196.2
Estimation Times (in ms)
Rounding-Down34243748–32535865193403711564615430838934154100
Rounding-Up37584227–46939935780434414365062476942864834528
Means35913988–39737895486419112964838453940894494314
Percentages of errors
Rounding-Down1.10.01.10.50.60.00.60.30.80.00.80.4
Rounding-Up1.40.11.30.81.10.40.60.81.20.30.90.8
Means1.30.11.20.70.80.20.60.51.00.10.90.6
Table 3

Mean percentages of better strategy selection, mean estimation times, and percentages of errors in young and older adults in the success and control conditions for rounding-down, rounding-up, and neutral target problems (Expt. 1).

Problem TypeYoung adultsOlder adultsMeans
ControlSuccessDifferencesMeansControlSuccessDifferencesMeansControlSuccessDifferencesMeans
Percentages of Better Strategy Selection
Rounding-Down70.472.11.771.264.372.38.068.367.372.24.869.8
Rounding-Up78.472.3–6.175.365.780.614.873.172.076.44.474.2
Means74.472.2–2.273.365.076.411.470.769.774.34.672.0
Estimation Times (in ms)
Rounding-Down45264679153460262874950–1338561954064814–5925110
Rounding-Up46454891246476867365240–1496598856905066–6255378
Neutral43754504129444062084898–1310555352924701–5904996
Means45154691176460364105029–1381572054634860–6035162
Percentages of errors
Rounding-Down0.51.71.21.11.80.6–1.21.21.21.20.01.2
Rounding-Up0.51.20.60.92.00.0–2.01.01.30.6–0.70.9
Neutral2.41.5–0.81.94.10.9–3.22.53.21.2–2.02.2
Means1.11.50.31.32.60.5–2.11.61.91.0–0.91.4
joc-1-1-17-g1.png
Figure 1

Young and Older Adults’ Strategy Use and Strategy Repetitions Under Control and Success Conditions (Expt. 1).

Table 4

Mean percentages of strategy repetitions in young and older adults under the success and control conditions for neutral, repeated, and unrepeated trials (Expt 1).

TrialsYoung adultsOlder adults
ControlSuccessDifferencesMeansControlSuccessDifferencesMeans
Neutral59.558.80.659.162.660.32.361.5
Repeated78.377.90.478.176.880.1–3.378.5
Unrepeated30.030.8–0.730.446.327.319.036.8
Means55.955.80.155.961.955.96.058.9

[i] Note. Differences: Control – Success.

joc-1-1-17-g2.png
Figure 2

Mean Estimation Performance in Young and Older Adults Under Control and Success Conditions (Expts. 1 and 2).

Table 5

Participants’ characteristics (Expt. 2).

CharacteristicsYoung adultsOlder adults
Control conditionSuccess conditionFControl conditionSuccess conditionF
N (females)27 (23)27 (21)30 19)30 (17)
Mean age (years;months)20;420;10.1271;573;92.43
Age range17;10–34;918;4–27;958;2–85;265;1–85;1
Number of years of education11.811.60.9111.711.50.73
Arithmetic fluency39.239,90.0576.077.3.06
MHVS118.419.00.1024.325.91.57
MMSE229.729.5

[i] Note. 1 Mill-Hill Vocabulary Scale, 2 Mini-Mental State Examination.

Table 6

Mean estimation times and percentages of errors in young and older adults under the success and control conditions for the rounding-down and rounding-up strategies (Expt. 2).

ConditionsYoung adultsOlder adultsMeans
RDRUMeansRDRUMeansRDRUMeans
Estimation Times (in ms)
Control626475666915459451494871542863575893
Success614871846666358141513866486556675266
Means620673756571408846504369514760125580
Differences11638224910139981006564690627
Percentages of Errors
Control7.814.010.93.37.25.35.610.68.1
Success6.013.49.71.52.11.83.77.85.8
Means6.913.710.32.45.13.64.79.26.9
Differences1.90.61.21.84.73.41.82.82.3

[i] Note. RD: Rounding-down strategy; RU: Rounding-up strategy. Differences = Control – Success.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.17 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 5, 2017
Accepted on: Jan 31, 2018
Published on: Feb 20, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Patrick Lemaire, Fleur Brun, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.