References
- Abubshait, A., Beatty, P., McDonald, C., Hassall, C. D., Krigolson, O., & Wiese, E. (2020). A win-win situation: Does familiarity with a social robot modulate feedback monitoring and learning? [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/6z75t
- Abubshait, A., & Wykowska, A. (2020). Repetitive Robot Behavior Impacts Perception of Intentionality and Gaze-Related Attentional Orienting. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.565825
- Ahn, H. S., Lee, M. H., & MacDonald, B. A. (2015, August). Healthcare robot systems for a hospital environment: CareBot and ReceptionBot. In 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 571–576).
IEEE . DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333621 - Ajoudani, A., Zanchettin, A. M., Ivaldi, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Kosuge, K., & Khatib, O. (2018). Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration. Autonomous Robots, 42(5), 957–975. DOI: 10.1007/s10514-017-9677-2
- Axelrod, R. (2006). The evolution of cooperation. Revised edition. Basic Books.
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bloom, P. (2017). Empathy and its discontents. Trends in cognitive sciences, 21(1), 24–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.004
- Bridges, D., Pitiot, A., MacAskill, M. R., & Peirce, J. W. (2020). The timing mega-study: Comparing a range of experiment generators, both lab-based and online. PeerJ, 8,
e9414 . DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9414 - Broadbent, E. (2017). Interactions with Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 627–652. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958
- Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., Van Bavel, J. J., & Saxe, R. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007
- Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Bounded empathy: Neural responses to outgroup targets’(mis) fortunes. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 23(12), 3791–3803. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00069
- Correia, F., Mascarenhas, S., Prada, R., Melo, F. S., & Paiva, A. (2018). Group-based Emotions in Teams of Humans and Robots. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 261–269. DOI: 10.1145/3171221.3171252
- Cross, E. S., Riddoch, K. A., Pratts, J., Titone, S., Chaudhury, B., & Hortensius, R. (2019). A neurocognitive investigation of the impact of socializing with a robot on empathy for pain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0034
- Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.2004
- Davis, M. H. (1983). Empathic Concern and the Muscular Dystrophy Telethon: Empathy as a Multidimensional Construct. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(2), 223–229. DOI: 10.1177/0146167283092005
- de Leeuw, J. R., & Motz, B. A. (2016). Psychophysics in a Web browser? Comparing response times collected with JavaScript and Psychophysics Toolbox in a visual search task. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0567-2
- Decety, J., Echols, S., & Correll, J. (2010). The blame game: the effect of responsibility and social stigma on empathy for pain. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 22(5), 985–997. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21266
- Eisenberg, N., Shea, C., Carlo, G., & Knight, G. P. (1991).
Empathy-related responding and cognition: A chicken and the egg dilemma . In Handbook of moral behavior and development: Vol. 2: Research (pp. 63–88). Psychology Press. - Eyssel, F., & Kuchenbrandt, D. (2012). Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 724–731. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.x
- Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes Toward High Achievers and Reactions to Their Fall: Theory and Research Concerning Tall Poppies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1–73. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60151-3
- Fraune, M. R. (2020). Our Robots, Our Team: Robot Anthropomorphism Moderates Group Effects in Human–Robot Teams. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01275
- Fraune, M. R., Šabanović, S., & Smith, E. R. (2017). Teammates first: Favoring ingroup robots over outgroup humans. 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 1432–1437. DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172492
- Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26. DOI: 10.1080/14792779343000004
- Hareli, S., & Weiner, B. (2002). Dislike and envy as antecedents of pleasure at another’s misfortune. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 257–277. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022818803399
- Henschel, A., Hortensius, R., & Cross, E. S. (2020). Social Cognition in the Age of Human–Robot Interaction. Trends in Neurosciences, S0166223620300734. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.03.013
- Hoogland, C. E., Ryan Schurtz, D., Cooper, C. M., Combs, D. J. Y., Brown, E. G., & Smith, R. H. (2015). The joy of pain and the pain of joy: In-group identification predicts schadenfreude and gluckschmerz following rival groups’ fortunes. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 260–281. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-014-9447-9
- Hortensius, R., & Cross, E. S. (2018). From automata to animate beings: The scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents: Socialness attribution and artificial agents. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1426(1), 93–110. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13727
- Hortensius, R., Hekele, F., & Cross, E. S. (2018). The Perception of Emotion in Artificial Agents. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 10(4), 852–864. DOI: 10.1109/TCDS.2018.2826921
- Kuchenbrandt, D., Eyssel, F., Bobinger, S., & Neufeld, M. (2013). When a Robot’s Group Membership Matters. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-013-0197-8
- Lakhmani, S. G., Wright, J. L., & Chen, J. Y. (2020).
Transparent interaction and human–robot collaboration for military operations . In Living with Robots (pp. 1–19). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815367-3.00001-3 - Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2008). “A vengefulness of the impotent”: The pain of in-group inferiority and schadenfreude toward successful out-groups. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(6). DOI: 10.1037/a0012629
- Lyons, J. B., Wynne, K. T., Mahoney, S., & Roebke, M. A. (2019). Trust and human-machine teaming: A qualitative study. In Artificial Intelligence for the Internet of Everything, 101–116. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817636-8.00006-5
- Miller, R., Schmidt, K., Kirschbaum, C., & Enge, S. (2018). Comparability, stability, and reliability of internet-based mental chronometry in domestic and laboratory settings. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1345–1358. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1036-5
- Molenberghs, P. (2013). The neuroscience of in-group bias. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(8), 1530–1536. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.002
- Montalan, B., Lelard, T., Godefroy, O., & Mouras, H. (2012). Behavioral Investigation of the Influence of Social Categorization on Empathy for Pain: A Minimal Group Paradigm Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00389
- Otten, S. (2016). The Minimal Group Paradigm and its maximal impact in research on social categorization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 85–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.010
- Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
- Phillips, E., Zhao, X., Ullman, D., & Malle, B. F. (2018). What is human-like? Decomposing robot human-like appearance using the Anthropomorphic roBOT (ABOT) Database. HRI ’18. DOI: 10.1145/3171221.3171268
- Pothos, E. M., Perry, G., Corr, P. J., Matthew, M. R., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2011). Understanding cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Personality and Individual Differences. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.002
- Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X02000018
- R Core Team. (2020). R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet] (4.0.0) [Computer software]. Foundation for Statistical Computing. DOI: 10.1017/S000305540013240X
- Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1967). Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation. American Political Science Review. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8
- Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., & Eimler, S. C. (2013). An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 17–34. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000660
- Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 393–414. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000660
- Smith, E. R., Šabanović, S., & Fraune, M. R. (in press). Through the Lens of Social Psychological Theories of Intergroup Behavior. Technology, Mind, and Behavior.
- Stürmer, S., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2005). Prosocial emotions and helping: The moderating role of group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 532. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.532
- Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 33–47).
http://ark143.org/wordpress2/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Tajfel-Turner-1979-An-Integrative-Theory-of-Intergroup-Conflict.pdf - Van Bavel, J. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012). A Social Identity Approach to Person Memory: Group Membership, Collective Identification, and Social Role Shape Attention and Memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1566–1578. DOI: 10.1177/0146167212455829
- van de Ven, N., Hoogland, C. E., Smith, R. H., van Dijk, W. W., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). When envy leads to schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 29(6), 1007–1025. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.961903
- Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2009). Leveling up and down: The experiences of benign and malicious envy. Emotion, 9, 419–429. DOI: 10.1037/a0015669
- van Dijk, W., Ouwerkerk, J., Goslinga, S., & Nieweg, M. (2005). Deservingness and Schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 19(6), 933–939. DOI: 10.1080/02699930541000066
- Vanman, E. J. (2016). The role of empathy in intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 59–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.007
- Vanman, E. J., & Kappas, A. (2019). “Danger, Will Robinson!” The challenges of social robots for intergroup relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(8),
e12489 . DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12489 - Willemse, C., & Wykowska, A. (2019). In natural interaction with embodied robots, we prefer it when they follow our gaze: A gaze-contingent mobile eyetracking study. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1771),
20180036 . DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0036 - Wykowska, A., Chaminade, T., & Cheng, G. (2016). Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(1693),
20150375 . DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0375 - Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608–1647. DOI: 10.1037/a0037679