Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Are there Reliable Qualitative Individual Differences in Cognition? Probably Not Cover

Are there Reliable Qualitative Individual Differences in Cognition? Probably Not

Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. De Simoni, C., & von Bastian, C. C. (2018). Working memory updating and binding training: Bayesian evidence supporting the absence of transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(6), 829858. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000453
  2. Draheim, C., Tsukahara, J. S., Martin, J. D., Mashburn, C. A., & Engle, R. W. (2021). A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(2), 242275. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000783
  3. Guye, S., & von Bastian, C. C. (2017). Working memory training in older adults: Bayesian evidence supporting the absence of transfer. Psychology and Aging, 32(8), 732746. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000206
  4. Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 11661186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
  5. Jewsbury, P. A., Bowden, S. C., & Strauss, M. E. (2016). Integrating the switching, inhibition, and updating model of executive function with the Cattell—Horn—Carroll model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 220245. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000119
  6. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49100. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
  7. Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232258. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002
  8. Paap, K. R., & Sawi, O. (2016). The role of test-retest reliability in measuring individual and group differences in executive functioning. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 274, 8193. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.10.002
  9. Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 501526. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000450
  10. Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., Souza, A. S., von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2019). Is executive control related to working memory capacity and fluid intelligence? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(8), 13351372. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000593
  11. Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 452467. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y
  12. Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2021). Are there reliable qualitative individual differences in cognition? Journal of Cognition, 4(1): 46, 1–16. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3ezmw
  13. Rouder, J. N., Kumar, A., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). Why most studies of individual differences with inhibition tasks are bound to fail. Manuscript in preparation. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3cjr5
  14. von Bastian, C. C., Blais, C., Brewer, G. A., Gyurkovics, M., Hedge, C., Kałamała, P., Meier, M. E., Oberauer, K., Rey-Mermet, A., Rouder, J. N., Souza, A. S., Bartsch, L. M., Conway, A. R. A., Draheim, C., Engle, R. W., Friedman, N. P., Frischkorn, G. T., Gustavson, D. E., Koch, I., Redick, T. S., Smeekens, B. A., Whitehead, P. S., & Wiemers, E. A. (2020). Advancing the understanding of individual differences in attentional control: Theoretical, methodological, and analytical considerations. Manuscript in preparation. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/x3b9k
  15. von Bastian, C. C., & Druey, M. D. (2017). Shifting between mental sets: An individual differences approach to commonalities and differences of task switching components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(9), 12661285. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000333
  16. von Bastian, C. C., Souza, A. S., & Gade, M. (2016). No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 246258. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000120
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.174 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: May 8, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jun 11, 2021
|
Published on: Aug 27, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Claudia C. von Bastian, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.