Qualitative Versus Quantitative Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience

Heleen A. Slagter; Fleur L. Bouwer

doi:10.5334/joc.170

Abstract

Individual differences in cognitive performance can be quantitative or qualitative in nature. Accounting for qualitative as well as quantitative individual differences is of importance for cognitive neuroscience, where a central goal is not only to relate brain function to behavior generally, but also to understand and predict individual behavior from neural data. In turn, cognitive neuroscience can help determine the nature of individual differences by revealing the underlying neural mechanisms and uncover qualitative individual differences that are not immediately apparent from behavioral data, enhancing our understanding of why and how people behave the way they do.

References

Clayson, P. E., Carbine, K. A., Baldwin, S. A., & Larson, M. J. (2019). Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability. Psychophysiology, 56(11), e13437. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13437
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cremers, H. R., Wager, T. D., & Yarkoni, T. (2017). The relation between statistical power and inference in fMRI. PLOS ONE, 12(11), e0184923. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184923
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gulbinaite, R., Johnson, A., de Jong, R., Morey, C. C., & van Rijn, H. (2014). Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity. NeuroImage, 99, 197–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.060
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maguire, E. A., Valentine, E. R., Wilding, J. M., & Kapur, N. (2003). Routes to remembering: The brains behind superior memory. Nature Neuroscience, 6(1), 90–95. DOI: 10.1038/nn988
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008). Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 11(1), 103–107. DOI: 10.1038/nn2024
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Poldrack, R. A., Baker, C. I., Durnez, J., Gorgolewski, K. J., Matthews, P. M., Munafò, M. R., Nichols, T. E., Poline, J.-B., Vul, E., & Yarkoni, T. (2017). Scanning the horizon: Towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(2), 115–126. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2016.167
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2021). Are there reliable qualitative individual differences in cognition? Journal of Cognition, 4(1): 46, 1–14. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3ezmw
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Dell’Acqua, F., Forkel, S. J., Simmons, A., Vergani, F., Murphy, D. G. M., & Catani, M. (2011). A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 14(10), 1245–1246. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2905
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tomer, R., Slagter, H. A., Christian, B. T., Fox, A. S., King, C. R., Murali, D., & Davidson, R. J. (2012). Dopamine Asymmetries Predict Orienting Bias in Healthy Individuals. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991). DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs277
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Turner, B. M., Rodriguez, C. A., Norcia, T. M., McClure, S. M., & Steyvers, M. (2016). Why more is better: Simultaneous modeling of EEG, fMRI, and behavioral data. NeuroImage, 128, 96–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.030
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Turner, B. O., Paul, E. J., Miller, M. B., & Barbey, A. K. (2018). Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies. Communications Biology, 1(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-018-0073-z
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438(7067), 500–503. DOI: 10.1038/nature04171
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Qualitative Versus Quantitative Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Paradigm

My account