References
- Azar, Z., Backus, A., & Özyürek, A. (2019). General and language specific factors influence reference tracking in speech and gesture in discourse. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 553–574. DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1519368
- Azar, Z., Backus, A., & Özyürek, A. (2020). Language contact does not drive gesture transfer: Heritage speakers maintain language specific gesture patterns in each language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 414–428. DOI: 10.1017/S136672891900018X
- Cooperrider, K., Fenlon, J., Keane, J., Brentari, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2021). How pointing is integrated into language: Evidence fro speakers and signers. Fronteris in Communication. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.567774
- Cormier, K., Fenlon, J., & Schembri, A. (2015). Indicating verbs in British Sign Language favour motivated use of space. Open Linguistics, 1, 684–707. DOI: 10.1515/opli-2015-0025
- Floyd, S. (2016). Modally hybrid grammar? Celestial pointing for time of day reference in Nheengatú. Language, 92(1), 31–64. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2016.0013
- Furman, R., Kuntay, A., & Özyürek, A. (2014). Early language-specificity of children’s event encoding in speech and gesture: Evidence from caused motion in Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 620–634. DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2013.824993
- Goldin-Meadow, S., & Brentari, D. (2015). Gesture, sign and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 1–82. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15001247
- Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019). Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 639–652. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006
- Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3
- Küntay, A. C., & Özyürek, A. (2006). Learning to use demonstratives in conversation: What do language specific strategies in Turkish reveal? Journal of Child Language, 33(2), 303–320. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000906007380
- Jackendoff, R. (1999). Possible stages in the evolution of language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(7), 272–279. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01333-9
- Lupyan, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752),
20170137 . DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0137 - Murgiano, M., Motamedi, Y., & Vigliocco, G. (2020). Situating language in the real-world: the role of multimodal iconicity and indexicality. Journal of Cognition, 3(1),
38 . DOI: 10.5334/joc.113 - Occhino, C., Anible, B., Wilkinson, E., & Morford, J. P. (2017). Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder. How language experience affects perceived iconicity. Gesture, 16(1), 100–126. DOI: 10.1075/gest.16.1.04occ
- Özyürek, A. (2017).
Function and processing of gesture in the context of language . In R. B. Church, M. W. Alibali, & S. D. Kelly (Eds.), Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating (pp. 39–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: 10.1075/gs.7.03ozy - Özyürek, A. (2018a).
Cross-linguistic variation in children’s multimodal utterances . In M. Hickmann, E. Veneziano, & H. Jisa (Eds.), Sources of variation in first language acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners (pp. 123–138). Amsterdam: Benjamins. - Özyürek, A. (2018b).
Role of gesture in language processing: Toward a unified account for production and comprehension . In S.-A. Rueschemeyer, & M. G. Gaskell (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 592–607). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.25 - Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1040–1054. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1040
- Özyürek, A., & Woll, B. (2019).
Language in the visual modality: Cospeech gesture and sign language . In P. Hagoort (Ed.), Human language: From genes and brain to behavior (pp. 67–83). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. - Peeters, D., & Özyürek, A. (2016). This and that revisited: A social and multimodal approach to spatial demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 222. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00222
- Perniss, P. M., Özyürek, A., & Morgan, G. (2015). The influence of the visual modality on language structure and conventionalization: Insights from sign language and gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(1), 2–11. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12127
- Perniss, P. M., Zwitserlood, I., & Özyürek, A. (2015). Does space structure spatial language? A comparison of spatial expression across sign languages. Language, 91(3), 611–641. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2015.0041
- Perniss, P. (2018). Why We Should Study Multimodal Language. Front. Psychol. 9:
1109 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01109 - Sandler, W., & Lilo-Martin, D. (2006).
Sign language and linguistic universals . Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139163910