Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Intact Goal-Driven Attentional Capture in Autistic Adults Cover

Intact Goal-Driven Attentional Capture in Autistic Adults

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Corresponding mean, standard deviation, and range values for participant age and scores on intelligence tests and the social responsiveness questionnaire (standard deviations in parentheses). Data is split by Group.

AGE (YEARS)WASISRS-2
VOCABULARYMATRIX REASONINGFULL IQ
NeurotypicalMean26(6)54(10)61(10)114(15)50(5)
GroupRange19–3839–7246–7890–13841–58
AutismMean30(8)62(10)60(10)119(14)75(9)
GroupRange20–5243–8044–7497–14661–98
joc-4-1-156-g1.png
Figure 1

Example experimental trial sequence (not to scale). Participants’ task was to locate a specific color rectangular bar (in this example, blue) and indicate whether this bar was horizontally or vertically oriented. Before each search display, participants viewed one of three possible kinds of cue display: a) cue matched the color of the subsequent rectangular bar being searched for (Target Color Cue), b) cue color appeared in subsequent search display as a nontarget bar (Nontarget Color Cue), c) cue consisted of a color that never appeared in search displays at all (Irrelevant Color Cue). Color cues could either validly or invalidly predict the location of the upcoming target item.

Table 2

Median reaction time (RT) in milliseconds and mean error rate (percentage incorrect trials) across Cue Type and Cue Validity conditions (standard deviations in parentheses). Data is presented overall and split by Group.

TARGET COLOR
CUE
NONTARGET COLOR
CUE
IRRELEVANT COLOR
Cue
CUE-
INVALID
CUE-
VALID
CUE-
INVALID
CUE-
VALID
CUE-
INVALID
CUE-
VALID
All participantsRT
Error rate
554 (59)
5 (5)
501 (53)
3 (4)
526 (55)
3 (3)
532 (61)
3 (4)
531 (56)
4 (4)
541 (62)
4 (5)
Neurotypical GroupRT
Error rate
534 (54)
4 (5)
483 (50)
2 (3)
508 (51)
3 (2)
509 (56)
3 (4)
512 (54)
3 (2)
519 (60)
2 (2)
AutismGroupRT
Error rate
575 (59)
6 (6)
519 (51)
3 (5)
545 (53)
4 (4)
555 (59)
4 (4)
551 (53)
4 (5)
563 (58)
5 (6)
joc-4-1-156-g2.png
Figure 2

Cue validity effects on reaction time (calculated as Cue-Invalid minus Cue-Valid RT in milliseconds) across each Cue Type condition, separately for neurotypical and autism groups.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.156 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 27, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 8, 2021
Published on: Mar 26, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Layal Husain, Nick Berggren, Anna Remington, Sophie Forster, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.