References
- Abrahamse, E., Braem, S., Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2016). Grounding cognitive control in associative learning. Psychological Bulletin, 142(7), 693–728. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000047
- Altmann, E. M. (2004). Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done? Psychological Science, 15(9), 616–622. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00729.x
- Aufschnaiter, S., Kiesel, A., Dreisbach, G., Wenke, D., & Thomaschke, R. (2018a). Time-based expectancy in temporally structured task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(6), 856–870. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000494
- Aufschnaiter, S., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2018b). Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments. Psychological Research, 82(1), 230–243. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0895-1
- Aufschnaiter, S., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2020). Humans derive task expectancies from sub-second and supra-second interval durations. Psychological Research, 84(5), 1333–1345. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01155-9
- Bonnin, C. A., Gaonac’h, D., & Bouquet, C. A. (2011). Adjustments of task-set control processes: Effect of task switch frequency on task-mixing and task-switching costs. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 985–997. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.594435
- Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., & Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39(4), 713–726. DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00466-5
- Bush, L. K., Hess, U., & Wolford, G. (1993). Transformations for within-subject designs: A Monte Carlo investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 566–579. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.566
- Capizzi, M., & Correa, Á. (2018).
Measuring Temporal Preparation . In A. Vatakis, F. Balcı, M. Di Luca, & Á. Correa (Eds.), Timing and Time Perception: Procedures, Measures, & Applications (pp. 216–232). Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004280205_011 - Chiu, Y. C., & Egner, T. (2017). Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(12), 1950–1960. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000420
- Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2006). Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 334–338. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193853
- Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 468–483. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.468
- Farooqui, A. A., & Manly, T. (2015). Anticipatory control through associative learning of subliminal relations: invisible may be better than visible. Psychological Science, 26(3), 325–334. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614564191
- Gotler, A., Meiran, N., & Tzelgov, J. (2003). Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 890–896. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196549
- Grabenhorst, M., Michalareas, G., Maloney, L. T., & Poeppel, D. (2019). The anticipation of events in time. Nature Communications, 10, 5802. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13849-0
- Grange, J. A., Kowalczyk, A. W., & O’Loughlin, R. (2017). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(8), 1568–1583. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000411
- Himi, S. A., Bühner, M., Schwaighofer, M., Klapetek, A., & Hilbert, S. (2019). Multitasking behavior and its related constructs: Executive functions, working memory capacity, relational integration, and divided attention. Cognition, 189, 275–298. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.010
- Horoufchin, H., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2011). The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: Task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 455–472. DOI: 10.1037/a0020557
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching — A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1474–1486. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1474
- Koch, I. (2005). Sequential task predictability in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 107–112. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196354
- Koch, I. (2008). Instruction effects in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(2), 448–452. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.448
- Koch, I., & Allport, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 433–444. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193420
- Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
- Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological bulletin, 144(6), 557–583. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144
- Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2013).
Bayesian data analysis for cognitive science: A practical course . New York: Cambridge University Press. - Liu, C., & Yeung, N. (2019). Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 46(2), 131–154. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000704
- Los, S. A., & Agter, F. (2005). Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: Segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1161–1170. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193549
- Los, S. A., Kruijne, W., & Meeter, M. (2014). Outlines of a multiple trace theory of temporal preparation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1058. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01058
- Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 4–26. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.1.4
- Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22(6), 1423–1442. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
- Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41(3), 211–253. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0736
- Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 493–516. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493
- Parry, D. A., & le Roux, D. B. (2018). Media multitasking and cognitive control: A systematic review of interventions. Computers in Human Behavior. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.031
- Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
- Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 207–231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
- Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.763
- Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2006). Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 623–640. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.623
- Schröter, H., Birngruber, T., Bratzke, D., Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2015). Task predictability influences the variable foreperiod effect: Evidence of task-specific temporal preparation. Psychological Research, 79(2), 230–237. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0550-z
- Steinborn, M. B., & Langner, R. (2012). Arousal modulates temporal preparation under increased time uncertainty: Evidence from higher-order sequential foreperiod effects. Acta Psychologica, 139(1), 65–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.10.010
- Strobach, T., Wendt, M., & Janczyk, M. (2018). Multitasking: executive functioning in dual-task and task switching situations. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 108. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00108
- Thomaschke, R., Bogon, J., & Dreisbach, G. (2018). Timing affect: Dimension-specific time-based expectancy for affect. Emotion, 18(5), 646–669. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000380
- Thomaschke, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2013). Temporal predictability facilitates action, not perception. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1335–1340. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612469411
- Thomaschke, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2015). The time-event correlation effect is due to temporal expectancy, not to partial transition costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 196–218. DOI: 10.1037/a0038328
- Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. DOI: 10.1037/a0019791
- Volberg, G., & Thomaschke, R. (2017). Time-based expectations entail preparatory motor activity. Cortex, 92, 261–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.019
- Wagener, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2010). Temporal cueing of target-identity and target-location. Experimental Psychology, 57(6), 436–445. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000054
- Ward, N., Hussey, E. K., Cunningham, E. C., Paul, E. J., McWilliams, T., & Kramer, A. F. (2019). Building the multitasking brain: An integrated perspective on functional brain activation during task-switching and dual-tasking. Neuropsychologia, 132. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107149