Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ways to Improve Multitasking: Effects of Predictability after Single- and Dual-Task Training Cover

Ways to Improve Multitasking: Effects of Predictability after Single- and Dual-Task Training

Open Access
|Jan 2021

Figures & Tables

joc-4-1-142-g1.png
Figure 1

Experimental design for Experiment 1. The pretest was done for familiarization and stimuli were randomized preventing learning. A predictable tracking task contained a repeating middle segment (i.e. rand-rep-rand), an unpredictable tracking tasks contained three random segments (i.e. rand-rand-rand). The predictable audio task was a tone sequence (i.e. sequence), with every fourth tone being the target tone. The unpredictable audio task used the same tones but in a random order (i.e. random). ST = single task, DT = dual-task.

joc-4-1-142-g2.png
Figure 2

Tracking results from the Test Block and Retention Test in Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Bars within a cluster show the tracking performance for repeating and random segments per group while the different cluster represent the conditions of the auditory task. We found significantly better tracking on repeating segments, but no differences between groups or tracking with sequenced or random tones. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

joc-4-1-142-g3.png
Figure 3

Reaction time results from the Test Block and Retention Test. Bars within each cluster show the RTs for sequenced and random tones per Group. Cluster on the x-axis represent the different conditions of the tracking task. Reactions to sequenced tones were significantly faster, but there was no difference in reaction times while tracking repeating or random segment. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

joc-4-1-142-g4.png
Figure 4

Tracking results from the Test Block and Retention Test in Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Bars within a cluster show the tracking performance for repeating and random segments per group while the different cluster represent the conditions of the auditory task. We found no significant difference in tracking with sequenced or random tones. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

joc-4-1-142-g5.png
Figure 5

Reaction time results from the Test Block and Retention Test. Bars within each cluster show the RTs for sequenced and random tones per Group. Cluster on the x-axis represent the different conditions of the tracking task. There were no significant differences between reaction times while tracking a repeating or random segment. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.142 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: May 11, 2020
|
Accepted on: Nov 23, 2020
|
Published on: Jan 7, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Harald Ewolds, Laura Broeker, Rita F. de Oliveira, Markus Raab, Stefan Künzell, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.