Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech Cover

Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech

By: Bo Yao  
Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. Abramson, M., & Goldinger, S. D. (1997). What the reader’s eye tells the mind’s ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(7), 10591068. DOI: 10.3758/BF03205520
  2. Alderson-Day, B., Bernini, M., & Fernyhough, C. (2017). Uncharted features and dynamics of reading: Voices, characters, and crossing of experiences. Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 98109. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.003
  3. Alexander, J. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2008). Reading voices and hearing text: talker-specific auditory imagery in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 446459. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.446
  4. Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2005). The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition, 96(3), B89100. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.006
  5. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
  6. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual review of psychology, 59, 617645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
  7. Belin, P., Zatorre, R. J., Lafaille, P., Ahad, P., & Pike, B. (2000). Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature, 403(6767), 309312. DOI: 10.1038/35002078
  8. Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as Demonstrations. Language, 66(4), 764805. DOI: 10.2307/414729
  9. Connell, L. (2007). Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition, 102(3), 476485. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.009
  10. Edmiston, P., & Lupyan, G. (2017). Visual interference disrupts visual knowledge. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 281292. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.002
  11. Eerland, A., Engelen, J. A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2013). The influence of direct and indirect speech on mental representations. Plos One, 8(6), e65480. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065480
  12. Filik, R., & Barber, E. (2011). Inner speech during silent reading reflects the reader’s regional accent. Plos One, 6(10), e25782. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025782
  13. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371395. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
  14. Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 8(5), 393402. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2113
  15. Köder, F., Maier, E., & Hendriks, P. (2015). Perspective shift increases processing effort of pronouns: a comparison between direct and indirect speech. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 30(8), 940946. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1047460
  16. Kurby, C. A., Magliano, J. P., & Rapp, D. N. (2009). Those voices in your head: activation of auditory images during reading. Cognition, 112(3), 457461. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.007
  17. McCutchen, D., Bell, L. C., France, I. M., & Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Phoneme-specific interference in reading: The tongue-twister effect revisited. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1), 87103. DOI: 10.2307/747733
  18. McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). The visual tongue-twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(6), 672687. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90870-2
  19. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(2), 165187. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90122-7
  20. Oppenheim, G. M. (2013). Inner speech as a forward model? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 369370. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12002798
  21. Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2017). A task-dependent causal role for low-level visual processes in spoken word comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(8), 12151224. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000375
  22. Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Six challenges for embodiment research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 593599. DOI: 10.1177/0963721419866441
  23. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329347. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495
  24. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372422. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
  25. Scott, S. K. (2019). From speech and talkers to the social world: The neural processing of human spoken language. Science, 366(6461), 5862. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax0288
  26. Scott, S. K., Blank, C. C., Rosen, S., & Wise, R. J. (2000). Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 123 Pt 12, 24002406. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2400
  27. Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153156. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00326
  28. Stites, M. C., Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The psychologist said quickly, “dialogue descriptions modulate reading speed!”. Memory & Cognition, 41(1), 137151. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0248-7
  29. Tian, X., Zarate, J. M., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Mental imagery of speech implicates two mechanisms of perceptual reactivation. Cortex, 77, 112. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.002
  30. Vilhauer, R. P. (2016). Inner reading voices: An overlooked form of inner speech. Psychosis, 8(1), 3747. DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2015.1028972
  31. Wildgruber, D., Ackermann, H., Kreifelts, B., & Ethofer, T. (2006). Cerebral processing of linguistic and emotional prosody: fMRI studies. In Understanding Emotions, 156, 249268. Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56013-3
  32. Yao, B. (2011). Mental simulations in comprehension of direct versus indirect speech quotations (Doctoral dissertation).
  33. Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 31463152. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00022
  34. Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2012). Brain “talks over” boring quotes: top-down activation of voice-selective areas while listening to monotonous direct speech quotations. Neuroimage, 60(3), 18321842. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.111
  35. Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations. Cognition, 121(3), 447453. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.007
  36. Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2015). Inner voice experiences during processing of direct and indirect speech. In L. Frazier & E. Gibson (Eds.), Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence processing, 46, 287307. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12961-7_15
  37. Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Direct speech quotations promote low relative-clause attachment in silent reading of English. Cognition, 176, 248254. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.017
  38. Zatorre, R. J., Belin, P., & Penhune, V. B. (2002). Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 3746. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01816-7
  39. Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 3562. New York: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44002-4
  40. Zwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: six replication attempts. Plos One, 7(12), e51382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051382
  41. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.141 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 19, 2020
|
Accepted on: Nov 5, 2020
|
Published on: Jan 8, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Bo Yao, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.