References
- Bonnin, C. A., Gaonac’h, D., & Bouquet, C. A. (2011). Adjustments of task-set control processes: Effect of task switch frequency on task-mixing and task-switching costs. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 985–997. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.594435
- Calabria, M., Branzi, F. M., Marne, P., Hernandez, M., & Costa, A. (2015). Age-related effects over bilingual language control and executive control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 65–78. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728913000138
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Contreras Saavedra, C., Schuch, S., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2020). The reliability of language-switch costs in bilingual one- and two-digit number naming. International Journal of Bilingualism. DOI: 10.1177/1367006920951873
- de Bruin, A., Treccani, B., & Della Sala, S. (2015). Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: An example of publication bias? Psychological Science, 26, 99–107. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614557866
- Declerck, M., Grainger, J., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2017). Is language control just a form of executive control? Evidence for overlapping processes in language switching and task switching. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 138–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.005
- Draheim, C., Hicks, K. L., & Engle, R. W. (2016). Combining reaction time and accuracy: The relationship between working memory capacity and task switching as a case example. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 133–155. DOI: 10.1177/1745691615596990
- Draheim, C., Tsukahara, J. S., Martin, J. D., Mashburn, C. A., & Engle, R. W. (2020). A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000783
- Gollan, T. H., Kleinman, D., & Wierenga, C. E. (2014). What’s easier: Doing what you want, or being told what to do? Cued versus voluntary language and task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2167–2195. DOI: 10.1037/a0038006
- Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1
- Hughes, M. M., Linck, J. A., Bowles, A. R., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Alternatives to switch-cost scoring in the task-switching paradigm: Their reliability and increased validity. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 702–721. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0411-5
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Kleinman, D., & Gollan, T. H. (2018). Inhibition accumulates over time at multiple processing levels in bilingual language control. Cognition, 173, 115–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.009
- Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2014).
Hypothesis tests for comparing correlations . Bibergau: Psychometrica. Available online at:https://www.psychometrica.de/correlation.html.Lenhard - Lord, F. M. (1963).
Elementary models for measuring change . In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 22–38). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. - Matheson, G. J. (2019). We need to talk about reliability: making better use of test-retest studies for study design and interpretation. PeerJ 7:
e6918 . DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6918 - Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2013). Mental chronometry and individual differences: Modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(5), 819–858. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0404-5
- Oberauer, K., Süß, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193. DOI: 10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00115-0
- Paap, K. R., Anders-Jefferson, R., Zimiga, B., Mason, L., & Mikulinsky, R. (2020). Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-020-0207-y
- Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002
- Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O. (2015). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 69, 265–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014
- Paap, K. R., Myuz, H. A., Anders, R. T., Bockelman, M. F., Mikulinsky, R., & Sawi, O. M. (2017). No compelling evidence for a bilingual advantage in switching or that frequent language switching reduces switch cost. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 89–112. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1248436
- Paap, K. R., & Sawi, O. (2016). The role of test-retest reliability in measuring individual and group differences in executive functioning. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 274, 81–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.10.002
- Prior, A., Degani, T., Awawdy, S., Yassin, R., & Korem, N. (2017). Is susceptibility to cross-language interference domain specific?. Cognition, 165, 10–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.006
- Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2011). Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(4), 682–691. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617711000580
- Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2013). The elusive link between language control and executive control: A case of limited transfer. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 622–645. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2013.821993
- Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism, 13(2), 253–262. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909990526
- Rey-Mermet, A., Gade, M., & Oberauer, K. (2018). Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 501–526. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000450
- Rouder, J. N., & Haaf, J. M. (2019). A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 772–789. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1558-y
- Salvucci, D. D., Taatgen, N. A., & Borst, J. P. (2009, April). Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1819–1828). DOI: 10.1145/1518701.1518981
- Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2006). Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 145–151. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193826
- Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
- Segal, D., Stasenko, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2019). More evidence that a switch is not (always) a switch: Binning bilinguals reveals dissociations between task and language switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(3), 501–519. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000515
- Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Trani, A. N., Redick, T. S., Sloan, P., Bunting, M. F., & Engle, R. W. (2015). The unity and diversity of working memory capacity and executive functions: Their relationship to general fluid intelligence. Manuscript submitted for review.
- Siegrist, M. (1997). Test–retest reliability of different versions of the Stroop test. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 131, 299–306. DOI: 10.1080/00223989709603516
- Stasenko, A., Matt, G. E., & Gollan, T. H. (2017). A relative bilingual advantage in switching with preparation: Nuanced explorations of the proposed association between bilingualism and task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(11), 1527–1550. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000340
- Timmer, K., Calabria, M., Branzi, F. M., Baus, C., & Costa, A. (2018). On the reliability of switching costs across time and domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1032. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01032
- Timmer, K., Calabria, M., & Costa, A. (2019). Non-linguistic effects of language switching training. Cognition, 182, 14–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.001
- Von Bastian, C. C., & Druey, M. D. (2017). Shifting between mental sets: An individual differences approach to commonalities and differences of task switching components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(9), 1266. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000333
- Von Bastian, C. C., Souza, A. S., & Gade, M. (2016). No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 246. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000120
- Weissberger, G. H., Wierenga, C. E., Bondi, M. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2012). Partially overlapping mechanisms of language and task control in young and older bilinguals. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 959–974. DOI: 10.1037/a0028281