References
- Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological bulletin, 141(5), 931. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000021
- Alderson-Day, B., Weis, S., McCarthy-Jones, S., Moseley, P., Smailes, D., & Fernyhough, C. (2016). The brain’s conversation with itself: Neural substrates of dialogic inner speech. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(1), 110–120. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsv094
- Athanasopoulos, P., Bylund, E., & Casasanto, D. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: New and interdisciplinary approaches to linguistic relativity. Language Learning, 66(3), 482–486. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12196
- Barca, L., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2017). Pacifier overuse and conceptual relations of abstract and emotional concepts. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2014. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02014
- Barca, L., Mazzuca, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2020, in press). Overusing the Pacifier during Infancy Sets a Footprint on Abstract Words Processing. Journal of Child Language. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000920000070
- Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(4), 577–660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
- Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319
- Barsalou, L. W. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities for Grounding Cognition. Journal of Cognition (in press). DOI: 10.5334/joc.116
- Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170144. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0144
- Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0013
- Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005).
Situating abstract concepts . In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 129–163). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007 - Berkovich-Ohana, A., Noy, N., Harel, M., Furman-Haran, E., Arieli, A., & Malach, R. (2020). Inter-participant consistency of language-processing networks during abstract thoughts. NeuroImage, 116626. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116626
- Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055
- Borghi, A. M. (2019). Linguistic relativity and abstract words. Paradigmi, 37(3), 429–448.
- Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001
- Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014).
Words As social Tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts . SpringerBriefs in Cognition series. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9539-0 - Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000089
- Borghi, A. M., Fini, C., & Tummolini, L. (in press).
Abstract concepts, metacognition and social metacognition . In M. D. Robinson & L. E. Thomas (Eds.), Embodied Psychology: Thinking, Feeling, and Acting. New York: Springer. - Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
- Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
- Clark, A. (1998).
Magic Words: How Language Augments Human Computation . In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511597909.011 - Connell, L. (2019). What have labels ever done for us? The linguistic shortcut in conceptual processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1308–1318. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1471512
- Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2013). Flexible and fast: Linguistic shortcut affects both shallow and deep conceptual processing. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 20(3), 542–550. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0368-x
- Crutch, S. J., Troche, J., Reilly, J., & Ridgway, G. R. (2013). Abstract conceptual feature ratings: the role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 186. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00186
- Cuccio, V., & Gallese, V. (2018). A Peircean account of concepts: grounding abstraction in phylogeny through a comparative neuroscientific perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170128. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0128
- Desai, R. H., Reilly, M., & van Dam, W. (2018). The multifaceted abstract brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170122. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0122
- Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological science, 24(5), 613–621. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612457374
- Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412–431. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.016
- Dove, G. (2014). Thinking in words: language as an embodied medium of thought. Topics in cognitive science, 6(3), 371–389. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12102
- Dove, G. (2019). More than a scaffold: Language is a neuroenhancement. Cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 1–24). DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2019.1637338
- Dove, G., Barca, L., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2020 in press, Psychological Research). Words have a weight: language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts. in press, Psychological Research PsychArxiv. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/j6xhe
- Dreyer, F. R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Abstract semantics in the motor system?–An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning. Cortex, 100, 52–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.021
- Falandays, J. B., & Spivey, M. J. (2019). Abstract meanings may be more dynamic, due to their sociality: Comment on “Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts” by Anna M. Borghi et al. Physics of life reviews, 29, 175–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2019.02.011
- Fingerhut, J., & Prinz, J. J. (2018). Grounding evaluative concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170142. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0142
- Fini, C., Era, V., Darold, F., Candidi, M., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). The role of social dimension during abstract concepts processing: A kinematic study of human-avatar motor interaction. Open Science Framework.
- Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: spatial–numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 260. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
- Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2018). Number concepts: Abstract and embodied. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170125. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0125
- Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.
- Foerster, F. R., Borghi, A. M., & Goslin, J. (2020). Labels strengthen motor leaning of new tools. Cortex, 129, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 24. PMID: 32417487.
- Fusaroli, R., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., Frith, C., & Tylén, K. (2012). Coming to terms: quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination. Psychological science, 23(8), 931–939. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612436816
- Galantucci, B., & Sebanz, N. (2009). Joint action: current perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 255–259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01017.x
- Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000310
- Gentilucci, M. (2003). Object motor representation and language. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 260–265. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1600-8
- Ghandhari, M., Fini, C., Darold, F., & Borghi, A. M. (2020). Different kinds of embodied language: A comparison between Italian and Persian languages. Brain and Cognition, 142, 105581. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105581
- Ghio, M., Vaghi, M. M. S., & Tettamanti, M. (2013). Fine-grained semantic categorization across the abstract and concrete domains. PloS one, 8(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067090
- Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language learning and development, 1(1), 23–64. DOI: 10.1207/s15473341lld0101_4
- Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905–922. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
- Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of memory and language, 43(3), 379–401. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2714
- Granito, C., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2015). Naming a lego world. The role of language in the acquisition of abstract concepts. PloS one, 10(1). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114615
- Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
- Harpaintner, M., Trumpp, N. M., & Kiefer, M. (2018). The semantic content of abstract concepts: A property listing study of 296 abstract words. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1748. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01748
- Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(2), 114–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007
- Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
- Juhasz, B. J., & Yap, M. J. (2013). Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 160–168. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0242-9
- Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and conceptual development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011).
Psychological research on joint action: theory and data . In Psychology of learning and motivation, 54, 59–101. Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00003-6 - Kominsky, J. F., Langthorne, P., & Keil, F. C. (2016). The better part of not knowing: Virtuous ignorance. Developmental psychology, 52(1), 31. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000065
- Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14. DOI: 10.1037/a0021446
- Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological review, 104(2), 211. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
- Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2008). Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic. Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 309–326). DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0015
- Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 28(2), 203–208. DOI: 10.3758/BF03204766
- Lund, T. C., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2019). Sensitivity to emotion information in children’s lexical processing. Cognition, 190, 61–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.017
- Lupyan, G., & Clark, A. (2015). Words and the world: Predictive coding and the language-perception-cognition interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 279–284. DOI: 10.1177/0963721415570732
- Lupyan, G., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2236–2253. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196698
- Lupyan, G., & Ward, E. J. (2013). Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(35), 14196–14201. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1303312110
- Lupyan, G., & Winter, B. (2018). Language is more abstract than you think, or, why aren’t languages more iconic? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170137. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0137
- Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’grady, L., …, & Shayan, S. (2018). Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11369–11376. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720419115
- Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y. (1999). Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(2), 230–262. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2593
- Malt, B., & Wolff, P. M. (Eds.) (2010). Words and the mind: How words capture human experience. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311129.001.0001
- Mazzuca, C., Borghi, A. M., van Putten, S., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Majid, A. (2020). Gender at the interface of culture and language: Conceptual variation between Italian, Dutch, and English. PsyArXiv. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/dpa8s
- Mazzuca, C., Lugli, L., Benassi, M., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2018). Abstract, emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors. PeerJ, 6,
e5987 . DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5987 - Mazzuca, C., Majid, A., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. (2020). Gender is a multifaceted concept: evidence that specific life experiences differentially shape the concept of gender. Language and Cognition. DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2020.15
- Mellem, M. S., Jasmin, K. M., Peng, C., & Martin, A. (2016). Sentence processing in anterior superior temporal cortex shows a social-emotional bias. Neuropsychologia, 89, 217–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.019
- Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Viinikainen, M., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Hari, R., & Sams, M. (2012). Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. PNAS, 109(24), 9599–9604. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206095109
- Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2017). Spoken words can make the invisible visible—Testing the involvement of low-level visual representations in spoken word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 499. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000313
- Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Six challenges for embodiment research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 593–599. DOI: 10.1177/0963721419866441
- Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (Vol. 9). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001
- Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Rapin, L., Lachaux, J. P., Baciu, M., & Loevenbruck, H. (2014). What is that little voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation to self-monitoring. Behavioural brain research, 261, 220–239. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.034
- Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and brain sciences, 36(4), 329–347. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495
- Ponari, M., Norbury, C. F., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Acquisition of abstract concepts is influenced by emotional valence. Developmental science, 21(2),
e12549 . DOI: 10.1111/desc.12549 - Rumiati, R. I., & Foroni, F. (2016). We are what we eat: How food is represented in our mind/brain. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(4), 1043–1054. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0908-2
- Scorolli, C., Daprati, E., Nico, D., & Borghi, A. M. (2016). Reaching for objects or asking for them: distance estimation in 7-to 15-year-old children. Journal of motor behavior, 48(2), 183–191. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2015.1070787
- Searle, J. R. (1985). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
- Shea, N. (2018). Metacognition and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170133. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0133
- Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(4), 186–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006
- Smirnov, D., Saarimäki, H., Glerean, E., Hari, R., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2019). Emotions amplify speaker–listener neural alignment. Human brain mapping, 40(16), 4777–4788. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24736
- Tian, X., Ding, N., Teng, X., Bai, F., & Poeppel, D. (2018). Imagined speech influences perceived loudness of sound. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(3), 225–234. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0305-8
- Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Mental imagery of speech: Linking motor and perceptual systems through internal simulation and estimation. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6, 314. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00314
- Troche, J., Crutch, S., & Reilly, J. (2014). Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 360. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00360
- Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2014). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht025
- Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 403–430. DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2019.23
- Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., Nicoletti, R., & Borghi, A. M. (2021). Sensorimotor and Interoceptive dimensions in concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 116, 104173, 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104173
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1986/1934). Thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human brain mapping, 31(10), 1459–1468. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20950
- Wang, Y., & Gennari, S. P. (2019). How language and event recall can shape memory for time. Cognitive psychology, 108, 1–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.10.003
- Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107(3), 829–853. DOI: 10.1093/brain/107.3.829
- Wiemer-Hastings, K., Krug, J., & Xu, X. (2001). Imagery, context availabilty, contextual constraint and abstractness. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 23, No. 23).
- Wilkinson, S., & Fernyhough, C. (2018).
When Inner Speech Misleads . In P. Langland-Hassan & A. Vicente (Eds.), (2010). Inner speech. New voices. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198796640.003.0010 - Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 104(19), 7780–7785. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701644104
- Zannino, G., Fini, C., Benassi, M., Carlesimo, A., & Borghi, A. M. (under review). Articulatory suppression delays processing of abstract concepts: the role of inner speech.
- Zdrazilova, L., Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2018). Communicating abstract meaning: concepts revealed in words and gestures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170138. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0138