References
- Abrahamse, E. L., Jiménez, L., Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(5), 603–623. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.603
- APA, A. P. A. (n.d.). Additive Effect.
https://dictionary.apa.org/additive-effect - Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erickson, K., & Becic, E. (2005). Training effects on dual-task performance: are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 695–709. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.695
- Broeker, L., Ewolds, H., de Oliveira, R. F., Künzell, S., & Raab, M. (n.d.). The impact of predictability on dual-task performance and implications for resource sharing accounts. Major Revision.
- Broeker, L., Liepelt, R., Poljac, E., Künzell, S., Ewolds, H., de Oliveira, R. F., & Raab, M. (2018). Multitasking as a choice: a perspective. Psychological Research, 82(1). DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0938-7
- Chambaron, S., Ginhac, D., & Perruchet, P. (2006). Is Learning in SRT Tasks Robust Across Procedural Variations? Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 148–153).
- Cohen, D. A., Ivry, R., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(1), 17–30. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.17
- de Oliveira, R. F., Billington, J., & Wann, J. P. (2014). Optimal use of visual information in adolescents and young adults with developmental coordination disorder. Experimental Brain Research, 232(9), 2989–2995. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3983-0
- de Oliveira, R. F., & Wann, J. P. (2010). Integration of dynamic information for visuomotor control in young adults with developmental coordination disorder. Experimental Brain Research, 205(3), 387–394. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2373-5
- Ewolds, H. E., Bröker, L., de Oliveira, R. F., Raab, M., & Künzell, S. (2017). Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Both Improve Dual Task Performance in a Continuous Pursuit Tracking Task. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(DEC). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02241
- Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2787
- Gaschler, R., Kemper, M., Zhao, F., Pumpe, I., Ruderisch, C.-B., Röttger, E., & Haider, H. (2018). Differential effects of cue-based and sequence knowledge-based predictability on multitasking performance. Acta Psychologica, 191, 76–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.004
- Gentsch, A., Weber, A., Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2016). Towards a common framework of grounded action cognition: Relating motor control, perception and cognition. Cognition, 146, 81–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.010
- Gozli, D. G., Aslam, H., & Pratt, J. (2016). Visuospatial cueing by self-caused features: Orienting of attention and action–outcome associative learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 459–467. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0906-4
- Kal, E., Prosee, R., Winters, M., & van der Kamp, J. (2018). Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. PloS One, 13(9),
e0203591 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203591 - Kemper, M., Umbach, V., Schwager, S., Gaschler, R., Frensch, P., & Stürmer, B. (2012). What I Say is What I Get: Stronger Effects of Self-Generated vs. Cue-Induced Expectations in Event-Related Potentials. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 562. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00562
- Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427(6971), 244–247. DOI: 10.1038/nature02169
- Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2006). Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 319–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.003
- Künzell, S., Sießmeir, D., & Ewolds, H. (2016). Validation of the Continuous Tracking Paradigm for Studying Implicit Motor Learning. Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 318–325. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000343
- Lee, Y., & Vakoch, D. A. (1996). Transfer and retention of implicit and explicit learning. British Journal of Psychology, 87(4), 637–651. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02613.x
- Magill, R. A. (1998). Knowledge is More than We Can Talk about: Implicit Learning in Motor Skill Acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(2), 104–110. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607676
- McDowd, J. M. (1986). The effects of age and extended practice on divided attention performance. Journal of Gerontology, 41(6), 764–769. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/41.6.764
- Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
- Pew, R. W. (1974). Levels of analysis in motor control. Brain Research, 71(2–3), 393–400. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90983-4
- Pfister, R., Heinemann, A., Kiesel, A., Thomaschke, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). Do endogenous and exogenous action control compete for perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 279–284. DOI: 10.1037/a0026658
- Raab, M., de Oliveira, R. F., Schorer, J., & Hegele, M. (2013). Adaptation of motor control strategies to environmental cues in a pursuit-tracking task. Experimental Brain Research, 228(2), 155–160. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3546-9
- Röttger, E., Haider, H., Zhao, F., & Gaschler, R. (2017). Implicit sequence learning despite multitasking: the role of across-task predictability. Psychological Research (pp. 1–18). DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0920-4
- Schmidt, R. A., & Wulf, G. (1997). Continuous Concurrent Feedback Degrades Skill Learning: Implications for Training and Simulation. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(4), 509–525. DOI: 10.1518/001872097778667979
- Schuck, N. W., Gaschler, R., & Frensch, P. A. (2012). Implicit learning of what comes when and where within a sequence: The time-course of acquiring serial position-item and item-item associations to represent serial order. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 83–97. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0106-0
- Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 3–18. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3
- Tsang, S. N. H., & Chan, A. H. S. (2015). Tracking and discrete dual task performance with different spatial stimulus-response mappings. Ergonomics, 58(3), 368–382. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.978901
- van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Bohm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Hinne, M., Kucharský, Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Raj, A., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2019). The JASP Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting a Bayesian Analysis. PsyArxiv Preprint, February, 1–31. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/yqxfr
- Van Ooteghem, K., Frank, J. S., Allard, F., Buchanan, J. J., Oates, A. R., & Horak, F. B. (2008). Compensatory postural adaptations during continuous, variable amplitude perturbations reveal generalized rather than sequence-specific learning. Experimental Brain Research, 187(4), 603–611. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1329-5
- Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779–804. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194105
- Walker, M. P., & Stickgold, R. (2004). Sleep-dependent learning and memory consolidation. Neuron, 44(1), 121–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.031
- Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2004). The perception of integrality: remembering through the validation of expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 891–908. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.891
- Wickens, C. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50(3), 449–455. DOI: 10.1518/001872008X288394
- Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593–602. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1238