References
- Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994).
Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks . In C. Umilità & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge: MIT Press. - Bonnin, C. A., Gaonac’h, D., & Bouquet, C. A. (2011). Adjustment of task-set control processes: Effect of task switch frequency on task-mixing and task switching costs. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 985–997. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.594435
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- Fintor, E., Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2018). Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: Modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality. Psychological Research, 82, 121–133. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0875-5
- Göthe, K., Oberauer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2016). Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings. Cognition, 150, 92–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.003
- Greenwald, A. G. (1972). On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 70–76. DOI: 10.1037/h0035451
- Hazeltine, E., & Ruthruff, E. (2006). Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck. Psychological Research, 70, 504–513. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0017-3
- Hazeltine, E., Ruthruff, E., & Remington, R. W. (2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 291–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.11.001
- Huestegge, L., & Hazeltine, E. (2011). Crossmodal action: Modality matters. Psychological Research, 75, 445–451. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0373-0
- Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Multisensory executive functioning. Brain and Cognition, 55, 325–327. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.072
- Jost, K., de Baene, W., Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 5–14. DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000125
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching - A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Koch, I., & Allport, A. (2006). Cue-based preparation and stimulus based priming of tasks in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 34, 433–444. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193420
- Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking – An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 557–583. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144
- Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
- Kreutzfeldt, M., Stephan, D. N., Sturm, W., Willmes, K., & Koch, I. (2015). The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching. Acta Psychologica, 155, 67–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.006
- Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
- Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
- Pashler, H. (2000).
Task switching and multitask performance . In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of Cognitive Processes (pp. 277–307). Cambridge: MIT Press. - Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2005). Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 58(A), 1325–1338. DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000656
- Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
- Sandhu, R., & Dyson, B. J. (2012). Re-evaluating visual and auditory dominance through task switching costs and congruency analyses. Acta Psychologica, 140, 111–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.003
- Schacherer, J., & Hazeltine, E. (2017). How conceptual overlap and modality pairings affect task-switching and mixing costs. Psychological Research, 83, 1020–1032. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0932-0
- Schäffner, S., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. (2018). The role of learning in sensory-motor modality switching during semantic categorizations. Psychological Research, 82, 955–969. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0872-8
- Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343–367. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
- Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974. DOI: 10.1037/a0020541
- Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2010). Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1075–1081. DOI: 10.1037/a0019695
- Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2011). The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching. Psychological Research, 75, 491–498. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0353-4
- Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2015). Tactile stimuli increase effects of modality compatibility in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 62, 276–284. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000291
- Stephan, D. N., & Koch, I. (2016). Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation. Psychological Research, 80, 935–943. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0700-y
- Stephan, D. N., Koch, I., Hendler, J., & Huestegge, L. (2013). Task switching, modality compatibility and the supra-modal function of eye movements. Experimental Psychology, 60, 90–99. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000175
- Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626. DOI: 10.1037/a0019791
- Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
- Zambarbieri, D. (2002).
The latency of saccades toward auditory targets in humans . In J. Hyönä, D. P. Munoz, W. Heide & R. Radach (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research, 140 (pp. 51–59). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)40041-6