Have a personal or library account? Click to login
S1-R2 and R1-R2 Backward Crosstalk Both Affect the Central Processing Stage Cover

S1-R2 and R1-R2 Backward Crosstalk Both Affect the Central Processing Stage

Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. Brüning, J., Mückstein, M., & Manzey, D. (in press). Multitasking strategies make the difference: Separating processing code resources boosts multitasking efficiency when individuals prefer to interleave tasks in free concurrent dual-tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000865
  2. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283321. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
  3. Durst, M., & Janczyk, M. (2018). The motor locus of no-go backward crosstalk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(12), 19311946. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000565
  4. Durst, M., & Janczyk, M. (2019). Two types of backward crosstalk: Sequential modulations and evidence from the diffusion model. Acta Psychologica, 193, 132152. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.013
  5. Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2008). Working memory involvement in dual-task performance: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Memory & Cognition, 36, 968978. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.5.968
  6. Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2011). Objects and events as determinants of parallel processing in dual tasks: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 152167. DOI: 10.1037/a0019958
  7. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 10581079. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1058
  8. Giammarco, M., Thomson, S. J., & Watter, S. (2016). Dual-task backward compatibility effects are episodically mediated. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(2), 520541. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0998-y
  9. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus–response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 13681384. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1368
  10. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66(4), 260273. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-002-0100-y
  11. Janczyk, M. (2016). Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(5), 631647. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000170
  12. Janczyk, M., & Huestegge, L. (2017). Effects of a no-go Task 2 on Task 1 performance in dual-tasking: From benefits to costs. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(3), 796806. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1257-6
  13. Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2020). Dual tasking from a goal perspective. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000222
  14. Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response-from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132(1), 3043. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001
  15. Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Wallmeier, G., & Kunde, W. (2014). Exceptions to the PRP effect? A comparison of prepared and unconditioned reflexes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 776786. DOI: 10.1037/a0035548
  16. Janczyk, M., Renas, S., & Durst, M. (2018). Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(2), 261276. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000445
  17. Johnston, J. C., & McCann, R. S. (2006). On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 694719. DOI: 10.1080/02724980543000015
  18. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching–A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
  19. Ko, Y. T., & Miller, J. (2014). Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task. Experimental Psychology, 61(1), 3037. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000224
  20. Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking–An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557583. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144
  21. Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(4), 12601280. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1260
  22. Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 212238. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196277
  23. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Hsieh, S., & Yu, Y.-T. (2007). Parallel central processing between tasks: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 133141. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194040
  24. Logan, G. D., & Delheimer, J. A. (2001). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(3), 668685. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.668
  25. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 10721090. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1072
  26. Masson, M. E. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 679690. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
  27. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749791. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.749
  28. Miller, J. (2006). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research, 70(6), 484493. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0011-9
  29. Miller, J., & Durst, M. (2014). “Just do it when you get a chance”: The effects of a background task on primary task performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(8), 25602574. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0730-3
  30. Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58(3), 273310. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003
  31. Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for common designs. R package version 0.9.12-4.2. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor
  32. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44(3), 193251. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0767
  33. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220244. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
  34. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(1), 1945. DOI: 10.1080/14640748908402351
  35. Renas, S., Durst, M., & Janczyk, M. (2018). Action effect features, but not anatomical features, determine the backward crosstalk effect: Evidence from crossed-hands experiments. Psychological Research, 82(5), 970980. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0873-7
  36. Rieger, T., & Miller, J. (2020). Disentangling stimulus and response compatibility as potential sources of backward crosstalk. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 117. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02039-6
  37. Röttger, E., & Haider, H. (2017). Investigating the characteristics of “not responding”: backward crosstalk in the PRP paradigm with forced vs. free no-go decisions. Psychological Research, 81(3), 596610. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0772-3
  38. Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331354). Amsterdam: North Holland. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61955-X
  39. Schubert, T., Fischer, R., & Stelzel, C. (2008). Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 376397. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.376
  40. Schweickert, R. (1978). A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18(2), 105139. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(78)90059-7
  41. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276315. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
  42. Thomson, S. J., Danis, L. K., & Watter, S. (2015). PRP training shows Task1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 212218. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0660-z
  43. Thomson, S. J., Watter, S., & Finkelshtein, A. (2010). Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(7), 17911802. DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1791
  44. Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 318. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3
  45. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2008). Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: Models and contamination effects. Cognitive Psychology, 57(2), 75121. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.004
  46. Watter, S., & Logan, G. D. (2006). Parallel response selection in dual-task situations. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(2), 254277. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193674
  47. Welford, A. T. (1952). The ‘psychological refractory period’ and the timing of high-speed performance–a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 219. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1952.tb00322.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.121 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 30, 2020
|
Accepted on: Aug 19, 2020
|
Published on: Oct 6, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Valentin Koob, Moritz Durst, Daniel Bratzke, Rolf Ulrich, Markus Janczyk, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.