Self-Monitoring in Speech Production: Comprehending the Conflict Between Conflict- and Comprehension-Based Accounts
By: Andreas Lind and Robert J. Hartsuiker
References
- Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 931–965. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000021
- Gauvin, H. S., De Baene, W., Brass, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). Conflict monitoring in speech processing: An fMRI study of error detection in speech production and perception. Neuroimage, 126, 96–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.037
- Gauvin, H. S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020). Towards a new model of verbal monitoring. Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
17 , pp. 1–37. DOI: 10.5334/joc.81 - Guenther, F. H. (1994). A neural network model of speech acquisition and motor equivalent speech production. Biological Cybernetics, 72, 43–53. DOI: 10.1007/BF00206237
- Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113–157. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0744
- Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 135–145. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3158
- Huettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 347–374. DOI: 10.1080/01690960903046926
- Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.
- Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Lind, A., Hall, L., Breidegard, B., Balkenius, C., & Johansson, P. (2014a). Speakers’ acceptance of real-time speech exchanges indicates that we use auditory feedback to specify the meaning of what we say. Psychological Science, 25, 1198–1205. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614529797
- Lind, A., Hall, L., Breidegard, B., Balkenius, C., & Johansson, P. (2014b). Auditory feedback of one’s own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: The “self-comprehension” hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 166. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00166
- Nozari, N. (2020). A comprehension- or a production-based monitor? Response to Roelofs (2020). Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
19 , pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.5334/joc.102 - Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011). Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 1–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.001
- Nozari, N., & Novick, J. (2017). Monitoring and control in language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 403–410. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417702419
- Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–131. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00090-1
- Reinfeldt, S., Östli, P., Håkansson, B., & Stenfelt, S. (2010). Hearing one’s own voice during phoneme vocalization – Transmission by air and bone conduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 751–762. DOI: 10.1121/1.3458855
- Roelofs, A. (2004). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, 561–572. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.561
- Roelofs, A. (2005).
Spoken word planning, comprehending, and self-monitoring: Evaluation of WEAVER++ . In R. J. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 42–63). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. - Roelofs, A. (2020a). Self-monitoring in speaking: In defense of a comprehension-based account. Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
18 , pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/joc.61 - Roelofs, A. (2020b). On (correctly representing) comprehension-based monitoring in speaking: Rejoinder to Nozari (2020). Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
20 , pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.5334/joc.112 - Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442–472. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.442
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.118 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 30, 2020
Accepted on: Jul 30, 2020
Published on: Sep 3, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
© 2020 Andreas Lind, Robert J. Hartsuiker, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.