References
- Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. L. (1994).
Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks . In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV (15th ed., pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. - Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory & Cognition, 32, 965–978. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196874
- Braem, S., Bugg, J. M., Schmidt, J. R., Crump, M. J. C., Weissman, D. H., Notebaert, W., & Egner, T. (2019). Measuring adaptive control in conflict tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 769–783. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.002
- Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., & Haider, H. (2006). Implicit task sets in task switching? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1221–1233. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1221
- Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., & Haider, H. (2007). The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm. Psychological Research, 71, 383–392. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0041-3
- Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229
- Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68, 138–154. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8
- Forrest, C. L. D., Monsell, S., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2014). Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1002–1024. DOI: 10.1037/a0035981
- Frings, C. (2011). On the decay of distractor-response episodes. Experimental Psychology, 58, 125–131. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000077
- Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., … Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 375–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
- Giesen, C., Schmidt, J. R., & Rothermund, K. (2020). The law of recency: An episodic stimulus-response retrieval account of habit acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2927. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927
- Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297–337. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0770
- Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2015). Learning from history: The need for a synthetic approach to human cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1435. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01435
- Horner, A. J., & Henson, R. N. (2011). Stimulus-response bindings code both abstract and specific representations of stimuli: Evidence from a classification priming design that reverses multiple levels of response representation. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1457–1471. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0118-8
- Koch, I., & Lavric, A. (2020). Has “erasing” made things clearer? Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
25 , pp. 1–3. DOI: 10.5334/joc.111 - Kramer, A. F., Cepeda, N. J., & Cepeda, M. L. (2001). Methylphenidate effects on task-switching performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1277–1284. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00007
- Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1–35. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90002-L
- Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575–599. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
- Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 832–840. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196709
- Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2006). Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases “switch costs” in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1250–1259. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193269
- Longman, C. S. (2020). A small platoon of idiots have been allowed to flourish, but the homunculus has not been erased from memory. Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
23 , pp. 1–3. DOI: 10.5334/joc.106 - Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2016). The coupling between spatial attention and other components of task-set: A task-switching investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2248–2275. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1115112
- Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., & Monsell, S. (2017). Self-paced preparation for a task switch eliminates attentional inertia but not the performance switch cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 862–873. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000347
- Longman, C. S., Lavric, A., Munteanu, C., & Monsell, S. (2014). Attentional inertia and delayed orienting of spatial attention in task-switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1580–1602. DOI: 10.1037/a0036552
- Meiran, N. (2020). Simple control. Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
26 , pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.5334/joc.107 - Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1423
- Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–253. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0736
- Meiran, N., Kessler, Y., & Adi-Japha, E. (2008). Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research, 72, 473–500. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0136-8
- Meiran, N., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2017). Powerful instructions: Automaticity without practice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 509–514. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417711638
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2017a). Dissociation of binding and learning processes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 2590–2605. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1393-7
- Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2017b). Overlearned Responses Hinder S-R Binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1–5. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000341
- Monsell, S. (2015).
Task-set control and task switching . In J. M. Fawcett, E. F. Risko, & A. Kingstone (Eds.), The handbook of attention (pp. 139–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. - Monsell, S. (2017).
Task set regulation . In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive control (pp. 29–49). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118920497.ch2 - Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (2000).
Banishing the control homunculus . In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: MIT Press. - Monsell, S., & McLaren, I. (2020). PEP does not dispense with but implements task-set reconfiguration. Can it handle phenomena more diagnostic of endogenous control? Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
27 , pp. 1–5. DOI: 10.5334/joc.109 - Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493–516. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493
- Mordkoff, J. T., & Halterman, R. (2008). Feature integration without visual attention: Evidence from the correlated flankers task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 385–389. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.385
- Moutsopoulou, K., Yang, Q., Desantis, A., & Waszak, F. (2015). Stimulus-classification and stimulus-action associations: Effects of repetition learning and durability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1744–1757. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.984232
- Pfeuffer, C. U. (2020). Item-specificity and intention in episodic memory. Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
24 , pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.5334/joc.110 - Pfeuffer, C. U., Moutsopoulou, K., Pfister, R., Waszak, F., & Kiesel, A. (2017). The power of words: On item-specific stimulus-response associations formed in the absence of action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 328–347. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000317
- Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
- Schmidt, J. R., Giesen, C., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 739–761. DOI: 10.1177/1747021820906397
- Schmidt, J. R., & Liefooghe, B. (2016). Feature integration and task switching: Diminished switch costs after controlling for stimulus, response, and cue repetitions. Plos One, 11,
e0151188 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151188 - Schmidt, J. R., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J. (2020). An episodic model of task switching effects: Erasing the homunculus from memory. Journal of Cognition. 3(1):
22 , pp. 1–38. DOI: 10.5334/joc.97 - Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343–367. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
- Verbruggen, F., McLaren, I. P. L., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Banishing the control homunculi in studies of action control and behavior change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 497–524. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614526414