References
- Adams, S. V., Wennekers, T., Cangelosi, A., Garagnani, M., & Pulvermuller, F. (2014). Learning visual-motor Cell Assemblies for the iCub robot using a neuroanatomically grounded neural network. 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB), 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/CCMB.2014.7020687
- Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Andrews, M., Frank, S., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). Reconciling embodied and distributional accounts of meaning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 359–370. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12096
- Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116, 463–498. DOI: 10.1037/a0016261
- Aydede, M., & Robbins, P. (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Baerger, D. R., & McAdams, D. P. (1999). Life story coherence and its relation to psychological well-being. Narrative Inquiry, 9, 69–96. DOI: 10.1075/ni.9.1.05bae
- Bagga, D., Reichert, J. L., Koschutnig, K., Aigner, C. S., Holzer, P., Koskinen, K., … Schöpf, V. (2018). Probiotics drive gut microbiome triggering emotional brain signatures. Gut Microbes, 9, 486–496. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2018.1460015
- Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (2015). The psychological construction of emotion. New York: Guilford.
- Barsalou, L. W. (1987).
The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts . In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101–140). Cambridge University Press. - Barsalou, L. W. (1989).
Intraconcept similarity and its implications for interconcept similarity . In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 76–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.006 - Barsalou, L. W. (1993).
Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols . In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, & M. A. Conway (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 29–101). London: Erlbaum. DOI: 10.4324/9781315782119-3 - Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
- Barsalou, L. W. (2003a). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 1177–1187. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319
- Barsalou, L. W. (2003b). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513–562. DOI: 10.1080/01690960344000026
- Barsalou, L. W. (2005).
Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems . In L. Gershkoff-Stowe & D. H. Rakison (Eds.), Building object categories in developmental time (pp. 389–431). Majwah, NJ: Erlbaum. - Barsalou, L. W. (2008a). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
- Barsalou, L. W. (2008b).
Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal systems . In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 9–42). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511805837.002 - Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1281–1289. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
- Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x
- Barsalou, L. W. (2016a).
Can cognition be reduced to action? Processes that mediate stimuli and responses make human action possible . In A. K. Engel, K. J. Friston & D. Kragic (Eds.), Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science (Strüngmann Forum Reports, Vol. 18. J. Lupp, Series Ed.) (pp. 81–96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. - Barsalou, L. W. (2016b). On staying grounded and avoiding Quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1122–1142. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3
- Barsalou, L. W. (2016c). Situated conceptualization offers a theoretical account of social priming. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 6–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.009
- Barsalou, L. W. (2016d).
Situated conceptualization: Theory and applications . In Y. Coello & M. H. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition: Volume 1. Perceptual and emotional embodiment (pp. 11–37). East Sussex: Psychology Press. - Barsalou, L. W. (2017a).
Cognitively plausible theories of concept composition . In Y. Winter & J. A. Hampton (Eds.), Compositionality and concepts in linguistics and psychology (pp. 9–30). London: Springer Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45977-6_2 - Barsalou, L. W. (2017b). What does semantic tiling of the cortex tell us about semantics? Neuropsychologia, 105, 18–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.011
- Barsalou, L. W. (2019). Establishing generalizable mechanisms. Psychological Inquiry, 30, 220–230. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2019.1693857
- Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170144. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0144
- Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. K., & Ruppert, J. A. (2003).
Social embodiment . In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 43–92. New York: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01011-9 - Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008).
Language and simulation in conceptual processing . In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0013 - Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005).
Situating abstract concepts . In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 129–163). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007 - Bickel, W. K., MacKillop, J., Madden, G. J., Odum, A. L., & Yi, R. (2015). Experimental manipulations of delay discounting & related processes: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103, 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.133
- Binder, J. R. (2016). In defense of abstract conceptual representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1096–1108. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0909-1
- Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H. (2016). Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1–45. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426
- Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where Is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767–2796. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055
- Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S. F., Rao, S. M., & Cox, R. W. (1999). Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 80–93. DOI: 10.1162/089892999563265
- Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 905–917. DOI: 10.1162/0898929054021102
- Blouw, P., Solodkin, E., Thagard, P., & Eliasmith, C. (2015). Concepts as Semantic Pointers: A Framework and Computational Model. Cognitive Science, 1–35. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12265
- Bollen, K., Cacioppo, J. T., Kaplan, R. M., Krosnick, J. A., Olds, J. L., & Dean, H. (2015). Social, behavioral, and economic sciences perspectives on robust and reliable science. Report of the Subcommittee on Replicability in Science Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, 3, 4.
- Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 263–292. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000089
- Bosch, O. J., & Young, L. J. (2018).
Oxytocin and Social Relationships: From Attachment to Bond Disruption . In R. Hurlemann & V. Grinevich (Eds.), Behavioral Pharmacology of Neuropeptides: Oxytocin (pp. 97–117). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2017_10 - Botvinick, M. M., Niv, Y., & Barto, A. C. (2009). Hierarchically organized behavior and its neural foundations: A reinforcement learning perspective. Cognition, 113, 262–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.011
- Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal Activity. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0
- Bouton, M. E., & Todd, T. P. (2014). A fundamental role for context in instrumental learning and extinction. Behavioural Processes, 104, 13–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.012
- Brunswik, E. (1947). Systematic and representative design of psychological experiments; with results in physical and social perception. Oxford, England: U. of California Press.
- Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217. DOI: 10.1037/h0047470
- Bruza, P. D., Wang, Z., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2015). Quantum cognition: A new theoretical approach to psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 383–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.001
- Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L., & Bernston, G. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of psychophysiology (4th edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781107415782
- Caligiore, D., Borghi, A. M., Parisi, D., & Baldassarre, G. (2010). TRoPICALS: A computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. Psychological Review, 117, 1188–1228. DOI: 10.1037/a0020887
- Casasanto, D., & Lupyan, G. (2015).
All concepts are ad hoc concepts . In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts (pp. 543–566). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. - Chapman, S. B., Aslan, S., Spence, J. S., DeFina, L. F., Keebler, M. W., Didehbani, N., & Lu, H. (2013). Shorter term aerobic exercise improves brain, cognition, and cardiovascular fitness in aging. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 5, Article 75. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00075
- Chen, L., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). A unified model of human semantic knowledge and its disorders. Nature Human Behaviour, 1. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0039
- Chen, J., Papies, E. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2016). A core eating network and its modulations underlie diverse eating phenomena. Brain and Cognition, 110, 20–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.04.004
- Clark, A. (1998). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. A Bradford Book.
- Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 1–73. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477
- Coello, Y., & Fischer, M. H. (Eds.). (2016a). Foundations of embodied cognition: Volume 1. Perceptual and emotional embodiment. Oxford, UK: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315751979
- Coello, Y., & Fischer, M. H. (Eds.). (2016b). Foundations of embodied cognition: Volume 2. Conceptual and interactive embodiment. Oxford, UK: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315751962
- Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2013). Flexible and fast: Linguistic shortcut affects both shallow and deep conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 542–550. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0368-x
- Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2014). Principles of representation: Why you can’t represent the same concept twice. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 390–406. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12097
- Connell, L., Lynott, D., & Banks, B. (2018). Interoception: The forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373,
20170143 . DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0143 - Cotelli, M., Manenti, R., Brambilla, M., & Borroni, B. (2018). The role of the motor system in action naming in patients with neurodegenerative extrapyramidal syndromes. Cortex, 100, 191–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.011
- Critchley, H. D., Eccles, J., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2013).
Chapter 6—Interaction between cognition, emotion, and the autonomic nervous system . In R. M. Buijs & D. F. Swaab (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (pp. 59–77). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53491-0.00006-7 - Critchley, H. D., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2018). The influence of physiological signals on cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 13–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.014
- Crutch, S. J., Troche, J., Reilly, J., & Ridgway, G. R. (2013). Abstract conceptual feature ratings: The role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 186. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00186
- Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25–62. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90005-X
- Dantzig, S., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2009). Unconstraining theories of embodied cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 345–351. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.11.001
- Daw, N. D., & Frank, M. J. (2009). Reinforcement learning and higher level cognition: Introduction to special issue. Cognition, 113, 259–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.005
- De Vega, M., Glenberg, A. M., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (2008). Symbols, embodiment, and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.001.0001
- Domjan, M. (2014). The principles of learning and behavior. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning.
- Dove, G. (2009). Beyond Perceptual Symbols: A Call for Representational Pluralism. Cognition, 110, 412–431. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.016
- Duschek, S., Muckenthaler, M., Werner, N., & Reyes del Paso, G. A. (2009). Relationships between features of autonomic cardiovascular control and cognitive performance. Biological Psychology, 81, 110–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.03.003
- Dutriaux, L., Clark, N., Papies, E. K., Scheepers, C., & Barsalou, L. W. (2019). Establishing individual differences in good and bad habits that reflect personality, conditioning, and reward. Manuscript under review.
- Edmiston, P., & Lupyan, G. (2017). Visual interference disrupts visual knowledge. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 281–292. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.002
- Edson, E. J. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 168–180. DOI: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&;2_19
- Eliasmith, C. (2013). How to Build a Brain: A Neural Architecture for Biological Cognition. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794546.001.0001
- Epel, E. S., Crosswell, A. D., Mayer, S. E., Prather, A. A., Slavich, G. M., Puterman, E., & Mendes, W. B. (2018). More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 49, 146–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001
- Ernst, G. (2017). Heart-Rate Variability—More than Heart Beats? Frontiers in Public Health, 5, Article 240. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00240
- Estes, Z., & Barsalou, L. W. (2018). A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Spatial Interference From Linguistic Cues: Beyond Petrova et al. (2018). Psychological Science, 29, 1558–1564. DOI: 10.1177/0956797618794131
- Fernandino, L., Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Pendl, S. L., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., … Seidenberg, M. S. (2016). Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 2018–2034. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv020
- Fernandino, L., Humphries, C. J., Seidenberg, M. S., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Binder, J. R. (2015). Predicting brain activation patterns associated with individual lexical concepts based on five sensory-motor attributes. Neuropsychologia, 76, 17–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.009
- Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.
- Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5
- Fredrickson, B. L., Grewen, K. M., Coffey, K. A., Algoe, S. B., Firestine, A. M., Arevalo, J. M. G., … Cole, S. W. (2013). A functional genomic perspective on human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 13684–13689. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305419110
- Galland, L. (2014). The Gut Microbiome and the Brain. Journal of Medicinal Food, 17, 1261–1272. DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2014.7000
- Gangestad, S. W., & Grebe, N. M. (2017). Hormonal systems, human social bonding, and affiliation. Hormones and Behavior, 91, 122–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.08.005
- Garagnani, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2016). Conceptual grounding of language in action and perception: A neurocomputational model of the emergence of category specificity and semantic hubs. European Journal of Neuroscience, 43, 721–737. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13145
- Gawronski, B., & Cesario, J. (2013). Of mice and men: What animal research can tell us about context effects on automatic responses in humans. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 187–215. DOI: 10.1177/1088868313480096
- Gendron, M., & Barrett, L. F. (2009). Reconstructing the Past: A Century of Ideas About Emotion in Psychology. Emotion Review, 1, 316–339. DOI: 10.1177/1754073909338877
- Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
- Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61–105. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90040-O
- Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 41–50. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X97470012
- Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377–396. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X04000093
- Hammond, K. R., & Stewart, T. R. (2001). The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42, 335–346. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6
- Harpaintner, M., Trumpp, N. M., & Kiefer, M. (2018). The Semantic Content of Abstract Concepts: A Property Listing Study of 296 Abstract Words. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01748
- Hoffman, P., McClelland, J. L., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). Concepts, control, and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition. Psychological Review, 125, 293–328. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000094
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Hurley, S. (2001). Perception and Action: Alternative views. Synthese, 129, 3–40. DOI: 10.1023/A:1012643006930
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Hutchinson, K. A. (1995). Androgens and sexuality. The American Journal of Medicine, 98, S111–S115. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80068-0
- Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532, 453–458. DOI: 10.1038/nature17637
- Huth, A. G., Nishimoto, S., Vu, A. T., & Gallant, J. L. (2012). A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain. Neuron, 76, 1210–1224. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.014
- Inagaki, T. K., Muscatell, K. A., Irwin, M. R., Cole, S. W., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Inflammation selectively enhances amygdala activity to socially threatening images. NeuroImage, 59, 3222–3226. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.090
- Ito, M., & Doya, K. (2011). Multiple representations and algorithms for reinforcement learning in the cortico-basal ganglia circuit. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 21, 368–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.04.001
- Janowsky, J. S. (2006). Thinking with your gonads: Testosterone and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 77–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.010
- Kemmerer, D. (2015). Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1068–1075. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0784-1
- Kemmerer, D. (2019). Concepts in the Brain: The View From Cross-linguistic Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190682620.001.0001
- Kemmerer, D., Rudrauf, D., Manzel, K., & Tranel, D. (2012). Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions. Cortex, 48, 826–848. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.001
- Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Gouin, J.-P., & Hantsoo, L. (2010). Close Relationships, Inflammation, and Health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 33–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.09.003
- Kiefer, M., Adams, S. C., & Zovko, M. (2012). Attentional sensitization of unconscious visual processing: Top-down influences on masked priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 50–61. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0102-4
- Kiefer, M., & Barsalou, L. W. (2013).
Grounding the human conceptual system in perception, action, and internal states . In W. Prinz, M. Beisert & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging d iscipline (pp. 381–407). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018555.003.0015 - Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805–825. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
- Kim, H.-G., Cheon, E.-J., Bai, D.-S., Lee, Y. H., & Koo, B.-H. (2018). Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature. Psychiatry Investigation, 15, 235–245. DOI: 10.30773/pi.2017.08.17
- Kuhnke, P., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2020). Task-Dependent Recruitment of Modality-Specific and Multimodal Regions during Conceptual Processing. Cerebral Cortex, Online publication. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa010
- Laitin, E. L., Tymoski, M. J., Tenhundfeld, N. L., & Witt, J. K. (2019). The uphill battle for action-specific perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 778–793. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-018-01652-w
- Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lambon Ralph, M. A., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 18, 42–55. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150
- Larsen, R. S., & Waters, J. (2018). Neuromodulatory Correlates of Pupil Dilation. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2018.00021
- Lebois, L. A. M., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W. (2015). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science, 39, 1764–1801. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12174
- Lebois, L. A. M., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Simmons, W. K., Barrett, L. F., & Barsalou, L. W. (2018). Learning situated emotions. Neuropsychologia, online publication. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.008
- Leritz, E. C., McGlinchey, R. E., Kellison, I., Rudolph, J. L., & Milberg, W. P. (2011). Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Cognition in the Elderly. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 5, 407–412. DOI: 10.1007/s12170-011-0189-x
- Levenson, R. W. (2014). The Autonomic Nervous System and Emotion. Emotion Review, 6, 100–112. DOI: 10.1177/1754073913512003
- Liu, Y., Dolan, R. J., Kurth-Nelson, Z., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2019). Human Replay Spontaneously Reorganizes Experience. Cell, 178, 640–652.e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.012
- Louwerse, M. M. (2008). Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 838–844. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.4.838
- Louwerse, M. M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35, 381–398. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x
- Machery, E. (2007). Concept empiricism: A methodological critique. Cognition, 104, 19–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.002
- Magnusdottir, E. H., Johannsdottir, K. R., Bean, C., Olafsson, B., & Gudnason, J. (2017). Cognitive workload classification using cardiovascular measures and dynamic features. 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 000351–000356. DOI: 10.1109/CogInfoCom.2017.8268269
- Mahon, B. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 420–429. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2014.987791
- Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102, 59–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004
- Manderino, L., Carroll, I., Azcarate-Peril, M. A., Rochette, A., Heinberg, L., Peat, C., … Gunstad, J. (2017). Preliminary Evidence for an Association Between the Composition of the Gut Microbiome and Cognitive Function in Neurologically Healthy Older Adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23, 700–705. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617717000492
- Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16, 6–10. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
- Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(80)90015-3
- Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
- Martin, A. (2016). GRAPES—Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 979–990. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0842-3
- Martin, A. E., & Baggio, G. (2020). Modelling meaning composition from formalism to mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375,
20190298 . DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0298 - Mather, M., & Thayer, J. F. (2018). How heart rate variability affects emotion regulation brain networks. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 98–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.12.017
- Mayer, E. (2016). The mind-gut connection: How the hidden conversation within our bodies impacts our mood, our choices, and our overall health. New York: HarperCollins.
- McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
- McEwen, B. S. (2013). The Brain on Stress Toward an Integrative Approach to Brain, Body, and Behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 673–675. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613506907
- McEwen, B. S. (2018). Redefining neuroendocrinology: Epigenetics of brain-body communication over the life course. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 49, 8–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.11.001
- Mehl, M. R., Raison, C. L., Pace, T. W. W., Arevalo, J. M. G., & Cole, S. W. (2017). Natural language indicators of differential gene regulation in the human immune system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 12554–12559. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707373114
- Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48, 788–804. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
- Meteyard, L., & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Lexico-semantics. In S.-A. Rueschemeyer & M. G. Gaskell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 71–90). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.4
- Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt Reinhart & Winston. DOI: 10.1037/10039-000
- Miller, G. E., Chen, E., & Parker, K. J. (2011). Psychological Stress in Childhood and Susceptibility to the Chronic Diseases of Aging: Moving Towards a Model of Behavioral and Biological Mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 959–997. DOI: 10.1037/a0024768
- Miller, L. C., Shaikh, S. J., Jeong, D. C., Wang, L., Gillig, T. K., Godoy, C. G., … Read, S. J. (2019). Causal Inference in Generalizable Environments: Systematic Representative Design. Psychological Inquiry, 30, 173–202. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2019.1693866
- Moreira, D., & Barbosa, F. (2019). Delay discounting in impulsive behavior: A systematic review. European Psychologist, 24, 312–321. DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000360
- Morey, R. D., et al. (2020). A Pre-registered, Multi-lab Non-replication of the Action sentence Compatibility Effect (ACE). Manuscript under Review.
- Muckli, L., De Martino, F., Vizioli, L., Petro, L. S., Smith, F. W., Ugurbil, K., … Yacoub, E. (2015). Contextual Feedback to Superficial Layers of V1. Current Biology, 25, 2690–2695. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.057
- Muckli, L., & Petro, L. S. (2017). The Significance of Memory in Sensory Cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 40, 255–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.03.004
- Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 429–434. DOI: 10.1038/nn1641
- Newell, A. (1973). Production systems: Models of control structures. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual Information Processing (pp. 463–526). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-170150-5.50016-0
- Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Newen, A., Bruin, L. D., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.001.0001
- Newman, M. L., Sellers, J. G., & Josephs, R. A. (2005). Testosterone, cognition, and social status. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 205–211. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.09.008
- O’Doherty, J. P. (2012). Beyond simple reinforcement learning: The computational neurobiology of reward-learning and valuation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 987–990. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08074.x
- Öhman, A., Hamm, A., & Hugdahl, K. (2000).
Cognition and the autonomic nervous system: Orienting, anticipation, and conditioning . In Handbook of psychophysiology, 2nd ed (pp. 533–575). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. - Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2017a). A task-dependent causal role for low-level visual processes in spoken word comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1215–1224. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000375
- Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2017b). Spoken words can make the invisible visible—Testing the involvement of low-level visual representations in spoken word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 499–508. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000313
- Ostarek, M., & Huettig, F. (2019).
Six Challenges for Embodiment Research : Current Directions in Psychological Science, Online publication. (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA). DOI: 10.1177/0963721419866441 - Ostarek, M., Ishag, A., Joosen, D., & Huettig, F. (2018). Saccade trajectories reveal dynamic interactions of semantic and spatial information during the processing of implicitly spatial words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1658–1670. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000536
- Ostarek, M., Joosen, D., Ishag, A., de Nijs, M., & Huettig, F. (2019). Are visual processes causally involved in “perceptual simulation” effects in the sentence-picture verification task? Cognition, 182, 84–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.017
- Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Papies, E. K. (2017). Situating interventions to bridge the intention-behaviour gap: A framework for recruiting nonconscious processes for behaviour change. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11,
e12323 . DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12323 - Papies, E. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2015).
Grounding desire and motivated behavior: A theoretical framework and review of empirical evidence . In W. Hofmann & L. F. Nordgren, The psychology of desire (pp. 36–60). New York: Guilford Press. - Papies, E. K., Best, M., Gelibter, E., & Barsalou, L. W. (2017). The role of simulations in consumer experiences and behavior: Insights from the grounded cognition theory of desire. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2, 402–418. DOI: 10.1086/693110
- Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.). (2005). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499968
- Perry, B. D., & Grace, D. C. (2015). How Growing Complexity of Consumer Choices and Drivers of Consumption Behaviour Affect Demand for Animal Source Foods. EcoHealth, 12, 703–712. DOI: 10.1007/s10393-015-1091-7
- Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013). Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 255–274. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12001525
- Price, H. H. (1953). Thinking and experience. Hutchinson Universal Library.
- Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00008.x
- Proffitt, D. R. (2013). An Embodied Approach to Perception By What Units Are Visual Perceptions Scaled? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 474–483. DOI: 10.1177/1745691613489837
- Prokasy, W. (2012). Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research. Elsevier.
- Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253–279. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X9900182X
- Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1706
- Pulvermüller, F. (2013). Semantic embodiment, disembodiment or misembodiment? In search of meaning in modules and neuron circuits. Brain and Language, 127, 86–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.015
- Pulvermüller, F., Garagnani, M., & Wennekers, T. (2014). Thinking in circuits: Toward neurobiological explanation in cognitive neuroscience. Biological Cybernetics, 108, 573–593. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-014-0603-9
- Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793–797. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03900.x
- Pylkkänen, L. (2019). The neural basis of combinatory syntax and semantics. Science, 366, 62–66. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax0050
- Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24. DOI: 10.1037/h0034650
- Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Reese, E., Haden, C. A., Baker-Ward, L., Bauer, P., Fivush, R., & Ornstein, P. A. (2011). Coherence of personal narratives across the lifespan: A multidimensional model and coding method. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 424–462. DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2011.587854
- Repetto, C., Colombo, B., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2013). The effects of rTMS over the primary motor cortex: The link between action and language. Neuropsychologia, 51, 8–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.001
- Riccardi, N., Yourganov, G., Rorden, C., Fridriksson, J., & Desai, R. (2019a). Degradation of Praxis Brain Networks and Impaired Comprehension of Manipulable Nouns in Stroke. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 467–483. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01495
- Riccardi, N., Yourganov, G., Rorden, C., Fridriksson, J., & Desai, R. H. (2019b). Dissociating action and abstract verb comprehension post-stroke. Cortex, 120, 131–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.013
- Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and Deterioration of Semantic Memory: A Neuropsychological and Computational Investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205–235. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205
- Rosenbaum, D. A., Carlson, R. A., & Gilmore, R. O. (2001). Acquisition of Intellectual and Perceptual-Motor Skills. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 453–470. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.453
- Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60–94. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.1.60
- Samuel, A. G. (1997). Lexical Activation Produces Potent Phonemic Percepts. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 97–127. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0646
- Schmälzle, R., Imhof, M. A., Grall, C., Flaisch, T., & Schupp, H. T. (2017). Reliability of fMRI time series: Similarity of neural processing during movie viewing. BioRxiv,
158188 . DOI: 10.1101/158188 - Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–424. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00005756
- Shaffer, F., & Ginsberg, J. P. (2017). An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Frontiers in Public Health, 5. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258
- Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451–486. DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000032
- Six Challenges for Embodiment Research—Markus Ostarek, Falk Huettig, 2019. (n.d.). Retrieved 6 February 2020, from
https://journals-sagepub-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/0963721419866441 - Slavich, G. M., & Cole, S. W. (2013). The Emerging Field of Human Social Genomics. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 331–348. DOI: 10.1177/2167702613478594
- Smith, F. W., & Muckli, L. (2010). Nonstimulated early visual areas carry information about surrounding context. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 20099–20103. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000233107
- Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 159–216. DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(90)90007-M
- Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2001). Representing Properties Locally. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 129–169. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0754
- Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Perceptual simulation in property verification. Memory & Cognition, 32, 244–259. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196856
- Stein, N. L., & Hernandez, M. W. (2007).
Assessing understanding and appraisal during emotional experience . In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 298–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Introduction to reinforcement learning. MIT Press. DOI: 10.1109/TNN.1998.712192
- Taylor Browne Luka, C., Dutriaux, L., Hendry, K., Stevenson, J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2019). Using the Situated Assessment Method (SAM2) to measure, predict, and understand trichotillomania. Manuscript in preparation.
- Tenhundfeld, N. L., & Witt, J. K. (2017). Distances on hills look farther than distances on flat ground: Evidence from converging measures. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1165–1181. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1305-x
- Thompson, E. (2010). Mind in Life. Harvard University Press.
- Troche, J., Crutch, S., & Reilly, J. (2014). Clustering, hierarchical organization, and the topography of abstract and concrete nouns. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00360
- Urgesi, C., Candidi, M., & Avenanti, A. (2014). Neuroanatomical substrates of action perception and understanding: An anatomic likelihood estimation meta-analysis of lesion-symptom mapping studies in brain injured patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00344
- Van Bavel, J. J., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Brady, W. J., & Reinero, D. A. (2016). Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 6454–6459. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1521897113
- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2016). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001
- Varga, S., & Heck, D. H. (2017). Rhythms of the body, rhythms of the brain: Respiration, neural oscillations, and embodied cognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 56, 77–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.09.008
- Vargas, R., & Just, M. A. (2020). Neural Representations of Abstract Concepts: Identifying Underlying Neurosemantic Dimensions. Cerebral Cortex, 30, 2157–2166. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz229
- Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1, 219–247. DOI: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.011
- Villani, C., Lugli, L., Liuzza, M. T., & Borghi, A. M. (2019). Varieties of abstract concepts and their multiple dimensions. Language and Cognition, 11, 403–430. DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2019.23
- Vukovic, N., Feurra, M., Shpektor, A., Myachykov, A., & Shtyrov, Y. (2017). Primary motor cortex functionally contributes to language comprehension: An online rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 96, 222–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.025
- Vukovic, N., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Learning with the wave of the hand: Kinematic and TMS evidence of primary motor cortex role in category-specific encoding of word meaning. NeuroImage, 202,
116179 . DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116179 - Wagenmakers, E.-J., Beek, T., Dijkhoff, L., Gronau, Q. F., Acosta, A., Adams, R. B., … Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 917–928. DOI: 10.1177/1745691616674458
- Wang, X., Wang, B., & Bi, Y. (2019). Close yet independent: Dissociation of social from valence and abstract semantic dimensions in the left anterior temporal lobe. Human Brain Mapping, 40, 4759–4776. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24735
- Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J. R., Atmanspacher, H., & Pothos, E. M. (2013). The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 672–688. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12043
- Werner, J., Dutriaux, L., Papies, E. K., Gelibter, E., Scheepers, C., Barr, D. J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2019). Using the Situated Assessment Method (SAM2) to measure, predict, and understand eating habits. Manuscript in preparation.
- Werning, M., Hinzen, W., & Machery, E. (2012). The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541072.001.0001
- Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2011). Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1105–1127. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032
- Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W. (2016).
A fundamental role for the human conceptual system in emotion . In L. F. Barrett, M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion (4th Ed.) (pp. 547–563). New York: Guilford Press. - Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Simmons, W. K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W. (2013). Contextual processing of abstract concepts reveals neural representations of nonlinguistic semantic content. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 920–935. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00361
- Winter, Y., & Hampton, J. A. (Eds.). (2017). Compositionality and concepts in linguistics and psychology. London: Springer Publishing.
- Witt, J. K., Tenhundfeld, N. L., & Tymoski, M. J. (2017). Is There a Chastity Belt on Perception? Psychological Science. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617730892
- Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, R729–R732. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00432-8
- Wu, L. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica, 132, 173–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002
- Yarkoni, T. (2019). The Generalizability Crisis [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/jqw35
- Yee, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1015–1027. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7
- Zelano, C., Jiang, H., Zhou, G., Arora, N., Schuele, S., Rosenow, J., & Gottfried, J. A. (2016). Nasal Respiration Entrains Human Limbic Oscillations and Modulates Cognitive Function. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 12448–12467. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2586-16.2016
- Zwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting Mental Simulation in Language Comprehension: Six Replication Attempts. PloS One, 7,
e51382 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051382
