References
- Arbuthnott, K. (2005). The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1030–1042. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1030
- Arbuthnott, K. D. (2008). The effect of task location and task type on backward inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 534–543. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.3.534
- Arbuthnott, K. D. (2009). The representational locus of spatial influence on backward inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 37, 522–528. DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.4.522
- Arbuthnott, K., & Woodward, T. S. (2002). The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimenta Psychology, 56, 18–29. DOI: 10.1037/h0087382
- Beurskens, R., & Bock, O. (2012). Age-related deficits of dual-task walking: A review. Neural Plasticity, 2012, 1–9. DOI: 10.1155/2012/131608
- Bock, O., Drescher, U., Janouch, C., Haeger, M., van Winsum, W., & Voelcker Rehage, C. (2019). An experimental paradigm for the assessment of realistic human multitasking. Virtual Reality, 23, 61–70. DOI: 10.1007/s10055-018-0342-7
- Bock, O., & Hagemann, A. (2010). An experimental paradigm to compare motor performance under laboratory and under everyday-like conditions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 193, 24–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.08.005
- Bock, O., & Steinberg, F. (2012). Age-related deficits of manual grasping in a laboratory versus in an everyday-like setting. Ageing Research, 4, e7. DOI: 10.4081/ar.2012.e7
- Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51, 1484–1525. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012
- Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 215–229. DOI: 10.1038/nrn755
- Dawson, D. R., & Marcotte, T. D. (2017). Special issue on ecological validity and cognitive assessment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(5), 599–602. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1313379
- Dingus, T. A., Guo, F., Lee, S., Antin, J. F., Perez, M., Buchanan-King, M., & Hankey, J. (2016). Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(10), 2636–2641. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1513271113
- Druey, M. D., & Hübner, R. (2007). The role of temporal cue-target overlap in backward inhibition under task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 749–754. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196832
- Engel, A. K., Friston, K. J., & Kragic, D. (2016). The pragmatic turn. Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034326.001.0001
- Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Cue-task associations in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(A), 762–769. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701268005
- Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2008). Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: Evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 51–55. DOI: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.1.51
- Graham, R. (1999). Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. Ergonomics, 42, 1233–1248. DOI: 10.1080/001401399185108
- Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2010). Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1003–1009. DOI: 10.1037/a0019129
- Grange, J. A., Kowalczyk, A. W., & O’Loughlin, R. (2017). The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1568–1583. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000411
- Hilt, P. M., & Cardellicchio, P. (2020). Attentional bias on motor control: Is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting? Psychological Research, 84, 276–284. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-0998-3
- Ho, C., & Spence, C. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver’s visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 157. DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.3.157
- Houghton, G., Pritchard, R., & Grange, J. (2009). The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 466–476. DOI: 10.1037/a0014648
- Jost, K., De Baene, W., Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Journal of Psychology/Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 5–14. DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000125
- Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
- Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching—A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1–14. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.1
- Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive Structure, Flexibility, and Plasticity in Human Multitasking – An Integrative Review of Dual-Task and Task-Switching Research. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 557–583. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000144
- Krampe, R. T., Schaefer, S., Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2011). Lifespan changes in multi-tasking: Concurrent walking and memory search in children, young, and older adults. Gait & Posture, 33, 401–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.012
- Kreutzfeldt, M., Stephan, D. N., Willmes, K., & Koch, I. (2017). Modality-specific preparatory influences on the flexibility of cognitive control in task switching. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2017.1293064
- Kvavilashvili, L., & Ellis, J. A. (2004). Ecological validity and the real-life/laboratory controversy in memory research: a critical and historical review. History and Philosophy of Psychology, 6(1), 59–80.
- Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2006). Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 347–363. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.347
- Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching. Acta Psychologica, 134, 318–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.004
- Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.4
- Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124–1140. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1124
- Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
- Müller, H. J., & Geyer, T. (2009). Dynamics of attentional control. Psychological Research, 73, 123–126. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0203-1
- Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. DOI: 10.1080/00335558008248231
- Schmuckler, M. A. (2001). What Is Ecological Validity? A Dimensional Analysis. Infancy, 2(4), 419–436. DOI: 10.1207/S15327078IN0204_02
- Schuch, S. (2016). Task inhibition and response inhibition in older versus younger adults: A diffusion model analysis. Frontiers in Cognition, 7, 1722. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01722
- Schuch, S., & Grange, J. A. (2019). Increased cognitive control after task conflict? Investigating the N–3 effect in task switching. Psychological Research, 83, 1703–1721. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1025-4
- Schuch, S., & Konrad, K. (2017). Investigating task inhibition in children versus adults: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 143–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.012
- Schuch, S., Werheid, K., & Koch, I. (2012). Flexible and inflexible task sets: Asymmetric interference when switching between emotional expression, sex, and age classification of perceived faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 994–1005. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.638721
- Sexton, N., & Cooper, R. P. (2017). Task inhibition, conflict, and the N-2 repetition cost: A combined computational and empirical approach. Cognitive Psychology, 94, 1–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.01.003
- Spence, C., & Santangelo, V. (2009). Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues: A review. Hearing Research, 258, 134–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.015
- Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626. DOI: 10.1037/a0019791
- Verhaeghen, P., Martin, M., & Sêdek, G. (2012). Reconnecting cognition in the lab and cognition in real life: the role of compensatory social and motivational factors in explaining how cognition ages in the wild. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(1–2), 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2011.645009
- Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113, 358–89. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358
- Wollesen, B., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2014). Training effects on motor–cognitive dual-task performance in older adults. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 11, 5–24. DOI: 10.1007/s11556-013-0122-z
- Woollacott, M., & Shumway-Cook, A. (2002). Attention and the control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging area of research. Gait & Posture, 16, 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-4