References
- Bechtel, W. (2008). Mechanisms in cognitive psychology: What are the operations? Philosophy of Science, 75, 983–994. DOI: 10.1086/594540
- Bechtel, W. (2009). Looking down, around, and up: Mechanistic explanation in psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 22, 543–564. DOI: 10.1080/09515080903238948
- Carrier, L. M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1339–1348. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1339
- Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., & Yu, A. J. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 933–942. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2098
- Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2009). The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: Flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S–R instructions. Experimental Psychology, 56, 128–133. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.128
- Cummins, R. (2010).
‘How does it work?’ vs. ‘What are the laws?’ In R. Cummins (Ed.), The world in the head. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199548033.003.0016 - Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343–353. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.343
- Fiedler, K. (1991). Heuristic biases in theory formation: On the cognitive processes of those concerned with cognitive processes. Theory & Psychology, 1, 407–430. DOI: 10.1177/0959354391014002
- Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123, 303–307. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.015
- Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., Brewer, L. E., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.325
- Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). The logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175. DOI: 10.1086/286983
- Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546–571. DOI: 10.1080/713755643
- Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1368
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B. (2009). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2
- Hommel, B. (2015).
Between persistence and flexibility: The Yin and Yang of action control . In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science, 2, 33–67. New York: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.003 - Hommel, B. (2018). Representing oneself and others: An event-coding approach. Experimental Psychology, 65, 323–331. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000433
- Hommel, B. (2019). Theory of Event Coding (TEC) V2.0: Representing and controlling perception and action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 2139–2154. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01779-4
- Hommel, B. (in press). Pseudo-mechanistic explanations in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Topics in Cognitive Science.
- Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2017a). The social transmission of metacontrol policies: Mechanisms underlying the interpersonal transfer of persistence and flexibility. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 43–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.009
- Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2017b). Meditation and metacontrol. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1, 115–121. DOI: 10.1007/s41465-017-0017-4
- Hommel, B., Lippelt, D. P., Gurbuz, E., & Pfister, R. (2017). Contributions of expected sensory and affective action effects to action selection and performance: evidence from forced- and free-choice tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 821–827. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1139-x
- Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
- Hommel, B., Sellaro, R., Fischer, R., Borg, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2016). High-frequency binaural beats increase cognitive flexibility: Evidence from dual-task crosstalk. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:1287. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01287
- Hommel, B., & Wiers, R. W. (2017). Towards a unitary approach to human action control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 940–949. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.009
- Jolicoeur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (1998) The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138–202. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0684
- Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility – A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
- Levy, J., Pashler, H., & Boer, E. (2006). Central interference in driving: Is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Science, 17, 228–235. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01690.x
- Lewin, K. (1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galilean modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141–177. DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1931.9918387
- Lien, M. C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 212–238. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196277
- Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393
- Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072–1090. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1072
- Memelink, J., & Hommel, B. (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control. Psychological Research, 77, 249–259. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0435-y
- Meyer, D., & Kieras, D. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of a psychological refractory-period phenomenon. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.749
- Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 273–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003
- Navon, D. (1984). Resources—a theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216–234. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.216
- Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.214
- Newell, A. (1973).
You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium . In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283–308). New York: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-170150-5.50012-3 - Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.358
- Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
- Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 19–45. DOI: 10.1080/14640748908402351
- Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. (1998).
Attentional limitations in dual-task performance . In H. Pashler (Ed.). Attention (pp. 155–189). New York: Psychology Press. - Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0601_1
- Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3–21. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.3
- Sanders, A. F. (1997). A summary of resource theories from a behavioral perspective. Biological Psychology, 45, 5–18. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05220-9
- Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
- Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1–36. DOI: 10.1037/h0073262
- Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3–18. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3
- Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00067.x
- Welford, A. T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance – A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1952.tb00322.x
- Welford, A. T. (1967). Single-channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica, 27, 5–22. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90040-6
- Wickens, C. D. (1984).
Processing resources in attention . In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63–101). New York, NY: Academic Press. - Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159–177. DOI: 10.1080/14639220210123806