Have a personal or library account? Click to login
PEP Does Not Dispense with but Implements Task-Set Reconfiguration. Can It Handle Phenomena More Diagnostic of Endogenous Control? Cover

PEP Does Not Dispense with but Implements Task-Set Reconfiguration. Can It Handle Phenomena More Diagnostic of Endogenous Control?

By: Stephen Monsell and  Ian McLaren  
Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  2. Altmann, E. M. (2004). The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 32, 153163. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195828
  3. Bertelson, P. (1961). Sequential redundancy and speed in a serial two-choice responding task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 90102. DOI: 10.1080/17470216108416478
  4. Brown, J. W., Reynolds, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 3785. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005
  5. De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and Performance XVIII (pp. 357376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. Forrest, C. L. D., Monsell, S., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2014). Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 40, 10021024. DOI: 10.1037/a0035981
  7. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297337. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0770
  8. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183216. DOI: 10.1080/713756773
  9. Karayanidis, F., Coltheart, M., Michie, P. T., & Murphy, K. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory and poststimulus components of task switching. Psychophysiology, 40, 329348. DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00037
  10. Karayanidis, F., & Jamadar, S. (2014). Event-related potentials reveal multiple components of proactive and reactive control in task-switching. In J. A. Grange & G. Houghton (Eds.), Task switching and cognitive control. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199921959.003.0009
  11. Karayanidis, F., Provost, A., Brown, S., Paton, B., & Heathcote, A. (2011). Switch-specific and general preparation map onto different ERP components in a task-switching paradigm. Psychophysiology, 48, 559568. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01115.x
  12. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching — A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849874. DOI: 10.1037/a0019842
  13. Kornblum, S. (1973). Sequential effects in choice reaction time: A tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and Performance IV (pp. 259288). New York: Academic Press.
  14. Lavric, A., Mizon, G. A., & Monsell, S. (2008). Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: A task-switching investigation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10161029. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06372.x
  15. Logan, G., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575599. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575
  16. MacLeod, C., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E. D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (2003). In opposition to inhibition. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 43, 163214. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(03)01014-4
  17. Mayr, U., Kuhns, D., & Rieter, M. (2013). Eye movements reveal dynamics of task control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 489509. DOI: 10.1037/a0029353
  18. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
  19. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134140. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
  20. Monsell, S. (2015). Task set control and task switching. In J. M. Fawcett, E. F. Risko & A. Kingstone (Eds.), The Handbook of Attention (pp. 139172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  21. Monsell, S. (2017). Task set regulation. In T. Egner (Ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control (pp. 2949). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118920497.ch2
  22. Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (2000). Banishing the control homunculus. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 332). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/1481.001.0001
  23. Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493516. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.493
  24. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327342. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194391
  25. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207231. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207
  26. Schmidt, J. R., & Liefooghe, B. (2016). Feature integration and task switching: Diminished switch costs after controlling for stimulus, response, and cue repetitions. Plos One, 11, e0151188. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151188
  27. Schmidt, J. R., Liefooghe, B., & De Houwer, J.. (2020). An episodic model of task switching effects: erasing the homunculus from memory. Journal of Cognition, 3(1): 22, pp. 1–38. DOI: 10.5334/joc.97
  28. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly-cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343367. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
  29. Steinhauser, M., Maier, M. E., & Ernst, B. (2017). Neural correlates of reconfiguration failure reveal the time course of task-set reconfiguration. Neuropsychologia, 106, 100111. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.018
  30. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601626. DOI: 10.1037/a0019791
  31. Verbruggen, F., McLaren, I. P. L., & Chambers, C. D. (2014). Banishing the control homunculi in studies of action control and behaviour change. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 497524. DOI: 10.1177/1745691614526414
  32. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361413. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.109 | Journal eISSN: 2514-4820
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 30, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jun 27, 2020
|
Published on: Sep 10, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Stephen Monsell, Ian McLaren, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.