References
- 1Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 427–440. DOI: 10.1080/14640748308402480
- 2Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013a). The ‘thinking’ in thinking-for-speaking: Where is it? Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4, 91–100. DOI: 10.1075/lia.4.1.05ath
- 3Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013b). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37, 286–309. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12006
- 4Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
- 5Becker, R. B., Ferretti, T. R., & Madden-Lombardi, C. J. (2013). Grammatical aspect, lexical aspect, and event duration constrain the availability of events in narratives. Cognition, 129, 212–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.014
- 6Bickel, W. K., Koffarnus, M. N., Moody, L., & Wilson, A. G. (2014). The behavioral- and neuro-economic process of temporal discounting: A candidate behavioral marker of addiction. Neuropharmacology, 76, 518–527. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.06.013
- 7Bickel, W. K., Miller, M. L., Yi, R., Kowal, B. P., Lindquist, D. M., & Pitcock, J. A. (2007). Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: Competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, 85–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.016
- 8Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6
- 9Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001).
Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories . In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620669.018 - 10Bybee, J. L., Pagliuca, W., & Perkins, R. D. (1991).
Back to the future . In E. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Volume II. Types of grammatical markers (pp.17–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.19.2.04byb - 11Bylund, E., Gygax, P., Samuel, S., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2019). Back to the future? The role of temporal focus for mapping time onto space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 174–182. DOI: 10.1177/1747021819867624
- 12Carreiras, M., Carriedo, N., Alonso, M. A., & Fernández, A. (1997). The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25, 438–446. DOI: 10.3758/BF03201120
- 13Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106, 579–593. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004
- 14Chapman, G. B., & Elstein, A. S. (1995). Valuing the future: Temporal discounting of health and money. Medical Decision Making, 15, 373–386. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500408
- 15Chen, J. I., He, T.-S., & Riyanto, Y. E. (2019). The effect of language on economic behavior: Examining the causal link between future tense and time preference in the lab. European Economic Review, 120, 103307. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103307
- 16Chen, M. K. (2013). The effect of language on economic behavior: Evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. American Economic Review, 103, 690–731. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.2.690
- 17Chen, S., Cronqvist, H., Ni, S., & Zhang, F. (2017). Languages and corporate savings behavior. Journal of Corporate Finance, 46, 320–341. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.07.009
- 18Cohn-Sheehy, B. I., & Ranganath, C. (2017). Time regained: How the human brain constructs memory for time. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 169–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.005
- 19Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect (reprinted). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 20Comrie, B. (1985). Tense (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139165815
- 21Dahl, Ö. (2000).
The grammar of future time reference in European languages . In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 309–328). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. - 22Dahl, Ö., & Velupillai, V. (2013).
The future tense . In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Retrieved fromhttp://wals.info/chapter/67 - 23D’Argembeau, A., Renaud, O., & Van der Linden, M. (2011). Frequency, characteristics and functions of future-oriented thoughts in daily life. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 96–103. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1647
- 24Dudschig, C., Lachmair, M., de la Vega, I., De Filippis, M., & Kaup, B. (2012). From top to bottom: Spatial shifts of attention caused by linguistic stimuli. Cognitive Processing, 13, 151–154. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0480-x
- 25Evans, V. (2003). The structure of time: Language, meaning, and temporal cognition. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- 26Fecica, A. M., & O’Neill, D. K. (2010). A step at a time: Preliterate children’s simulation of narrative movement during story comprehension. Cognition, 116, 368–381. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.014
- 27Ferretti, T. R., Rohde, H., Kehler, A., & Crutchley, M. (2009). Verb aspect, event structure, and coreferential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 191–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.001
- 28Flecken, M., von Stutterheim, C., & Carroll, M. (2014). Grammatical aspect influences motion event perception: Findings from a cross-linguistic non-verbal recognition task. Language and Cognition, 6, 45–78. DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2013.2
- 29Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35, 1305–1328. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01193.x
- 30Galor, O., Özak, Ö., & Sarid, A. (2016). Geographical origins and economic consequences of language structures. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6149. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2820889
- 31Galor, O., Özak, Ö., & Sarid, A. (2018). Geographical roots of the coevolution of cultural and linguistic traits. NBER Working Paper Series No. w25289. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/me2g7
- 32Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317, 1351–1354. DOI: 10.1126/science.1144161
- 33Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196313
- 34Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
- 35Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 436–441. DOI: 10.3758/BF03194085
- 36Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
- 37Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269–299. DOI: 10.1006/jmps.2001.1388
- 38Ireland, M. E., Schwartz, H. A., Chen, Q., Ungar, L. H., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Future-oriented tweets predict lower county-level HIV prevalence in the United States. Health Psychology, 34, 1252–1260. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000279
- 39Jarmolowicz, D. P., Lemley, S. M., Cruse, D., & Sofis, M. J. (2015). A cup today or a pot later: On the discounting of delayed caffeinated beverages. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 13, 101–112. DOI: 10.1515/jafio-2015-0021
- 40Jenkins, L. J., & Ranganath, C. (2010). Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe activity at encoding predicts temporal context memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 15558–15565. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1337-10.2010
- 41Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- 42Kim, S., & Filimonau, V. (2017). On linguistic relativity and pro-environmental attitudes in tourism. Tourism Management, 63, 158–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.012
- 43Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. DOI: 10.1037//0033-295X.85.5.363
- 44Konishi, T. (1993). The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 519–534. DOI: 10.1007/BF01068252
- 45Kooij, D. T. A. M., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 867–893. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000306
- 46Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- 47Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (Edited by Dorwin Cartwright). Oxford, England: Harpers.
- 48Liang, H., Marquis, C., Renneboog, L., & Sun, S. L. (2018). Future-time framing: The effect of language on corporate future orientation. Organization Science, 29, 1–19. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2018.1217
- 49Lucy, J. A. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620713
- 50MacLeod, A. (2017). Prospection, well-being, and mental health (First edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/med:psych/9780198725046.001.0001
- 51MacLeod, A. K., & O’Conner, R. C. (2018).
Positive future-thinking, well-being, and mental health . In G. Oettingen, A. T. Sevincer & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), The psychology of thinking about the future (pp. 199–213). New York and London: The Guilford Press. - 52Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 31, 663–672. DOI: 10.3758/BF03196106
- 53Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes, 29, 83–112. DOI: 10.1207/S15326950dp2902_1
- 54Mavisakalyan, A., Tarverdi, Y., & Weber, C. (2018). Talking in the present, caring for the future: Language and environment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46, 1370–1387. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2018.01.003
- 55Monaco, E., Jost, L. B., Gygax, P. M., & Annoni, J.-M. (2019). Embodied semantics in a second language: critical review and clinical implications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 110. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00110
- 56Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 220–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.008
- 57Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin.
- 58Pérez, E. O., & Tavits, M. (2017). Language shapes people’s time perspective and support for future-oriented policies: Language and political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 61, 715–727. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12290
- 59Polyn, S. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). Memory search and the neural representation of context. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 24–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.010
- 60Radford, A. (1997). Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139166706
- 61Roberts, S. G., Winters, J., & Chen, K. (2015). Future tense and economic decisions: Controlling for cultural evolution. PLOS ONE, 10,
e0132145 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132145 - 62Sato, S., Gygax, P. M., & Gabriel, U. (2013). Gender inferences: Grammatical features and their impact on the representation of gender in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 792–807. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728912000739
- 63Sera, M. D., Berge, C. A. H., & del Castillo Pintado, J. (1994). Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development, 9, 261–292. DOI: 10.1016/0885-2014(94)90007-8
- 64Slobin, D. I. (2003).
Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity . In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press. - 65Speed, L. J., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). Eye movements reveal the dynamic simulation of speed in language. Cognitive Science, 38, 367–382. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12096
- 66Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00326
- 67Story, G. W., Vlaev, I., Seymour, B., Darzi, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 1–20. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00076
- 68Su, X., Tang, Y., & Xu, B. (2016). Reward-timing uncertainty, languages, and R&D investment. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2761432
- 69Sutter, M., Angerer, S., Glätzle-Rützler, D., & Lergetporer, P. (2018). Language group differences in time preferences: Evidence from primary school children in a bilingual city. European Economic Review, 106, 21–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.04.003
- 70Szpunar, K. K., Spreng, R. N., & Schacter, D. L. (2016).
Toward a taxonomy of future thinking . In K. Michaelian, S. B. Klein & K. K. Szpunar (Eds.), Seeing the future: Theoretical perspectives on future-oriented mental time travel. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190241537.003.0002 - 71Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. DOI: 10.1177/0261927X09351676
- 72Teuscher, U., & Mitchell, S. H. (2011). Relation between time perspective and delay discounting: A literature review. The Psychological Record, 61, 613–632. DOI: 10.1007/BF03395780
- 73Thoma, D., & Tytus, A. E. (2018). How cross-linguistic differences in the grammaticalization of future time reference influence intertemporal choices. Cognitive Science, 42, 974–1000. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12525
- 74Thorstad, R., & Wolff, P. (2018). A big data analysis of the relationship between future thinking and decision-making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, E1740–E1748. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1706589115
- 75Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1196–1207. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1196
- 76Zwaan, R. A. (2004).
The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension . In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory: Vol. 44 (pp. 35–62). New York, NY: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44002-4 - 77Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
- 78Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006).
Discourse comprehension . In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 725–764). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50019-5 - 79Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430
- 80Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1