Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Geospatial Data for the Medieval Road System in the Levant (Bilād al-Šām) from the Project ‘VIA-TARIQ: Analysing the Long-Term Change and Persistency of the Roman Road System in the Levant’ Cover

Geospatial Data for the Medieval Road System in the Levant (Bilād al-Šām) from the Project ‘VIA-TARIQ: Analysing the Long-Term Change and Persistency of the Roman Road System in the Levant’

By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Map of the study region and digitised road networks. a) Early Islamic period, b) Middle Islamic period, c) Early Mamluk period, d) Late Mamluk period, e) Study region (marked in black outline) in its geographical context. © Adam Pažout.

Table 1

Summary statistics of Segment certainty and Road certainty categories of the road dataset by periods.

EARLY ISLAMICMIDDLE ISLAMICEARLY MAMLUKLATE MAMLUK
SEGMENT CERTAINTY
LENGTH (km)PERCENTAGELENGTH (km)PERCENTAGELENGTH (km)PERCENTAGELENGTH (km)PERCENTAGE
Certain1,622.813.2%1,331.911.3%1,339.311.6%1,333.611.5%
Conjectured8,412.568.4%9,417.879.7%9,436.482.1%9,614.582.6%
Hypothetical2,227.218.4%1,065.29%716.16.3%685.45.9%
ROAD CERTAINTY
LENGTH (km)PERCENTAGELENGTH (km)PERCENTAGELENGTH (km)PERCENTAGELENGTH (km)PERCENTAGE
High7,656.462.3%7,515.963.6%7,957.569.2%8,104.169.7%
Medium1,650.124.3%4,197.735.5%3,500.430.5%3,495.530%
Low4,441.513.4%101.30.9%33.80.3%33.80.3%
Table 2

Periodisation and terminology used in the dataset.

PERIODISATION USEDDATINGDYNASTY/OTHER TERMINOLOGY
Early Islamic650–950 CEUmayyad, Abbasid
Middle Islamic950–1250 CEFatimid, Middle Byzantine, Seljuk, Crusader, Ayyubid
Early Mamluk1250–1350 CEMamluk, Middle Islamic
Late Mamluk1350–1517 CEMamluk, Middle Islamic
Table 3

Summary statistics of the dataset.

PERIODROAD LENGTH (km)NUMBER OF SITES
Early Islamic12,262.5361
Middle Islamic11,814.9409
Early Mamluk11,491.8429
Late Mamluk11,633.5443
Table 4

Data structure of the _roads files.

FIELD NAMEMEANINGTYPEDESCRIPTION
IdIdinteger (Long Integer)Unique numerical identifier
namenamestring (text)Name of the road segment, typically in the form ‘Start point-End point’ using Medieval or modern names depending on whether the Medieval name is known. Arabic forms are preferred, English forms that are commonly used (Jerusalem, Damascus, etc.) are employed
typetypestring (text)Type of the road segment, values: ‘Main Road’ and ‘Secondary Road’
typeCodetype codeinteger (Long Integer)Road type numerical code, values: 2 = ‘Main Road’ and 1 = ‘Secondary Road’
itineraryitinerarystring (text)Name of the known itinerary associated with the road segment, e.g., ‘Hajj Route’, ‘Barid’ etc.
sourcesourcestring (text)Medieval source that (probably) references the road segment, short reference in the form ‘Name Page Number’ of the standard primary edition or translation (see bibliography.md file for the full reference)
bibliobibliographystring (text)Reference to a secondary literature that was used to identify, localise, and digitise the road segment. Short reference in the form ‘Name Year’ (see bibliography.md file for full reference)
segmentCersegment certaintystring (text)Spatial accuracy of the digitisation of the road segment. Values: ‘Certain’ (+/– 50 m in mountainous terrain, +/–200 in flat terrain), ‘Conjectured’, ‘Hypothetical’ (mostly unfixed desert routes)
roadCerroad certaintystring (text)Certainty of the existence of the road segment based on the available primary and secondary sources. Values: ‘High’ (primary and secondary sources, or good archaeological/historical-geographical secondary literature), ‘Medium’ (based on archaeological and historical-geographical secondary literature), ‘Low’ (based only on settlement context or archaeological secondary literature)
geoLengthgeodesic lengthinteger (32-bit Float)Geodesic length of the road segment in meters
citationcitationstring (text)Author of the digitisation
Table 5

Data structure of the _sites files.

FIELD NAMEMEANINGTYPEDESCRIPTION
IdIdinteger (Long Integer)Unique numerical identifier
namenamestring (text)Medieval name of the site. Arabic forms are preferred, in some cases Frankish/Latin names are used
modernNamemodern namestring (text)Modern name of the site
typetypestring (text)Type of the site. Values: ‘city’, ‘settlement’, ‘station’, ‘fort’, ‘place’, ‘sanctuary’, ‘bridge’
minDateminimum datestring (text)Earliest date the site can be dated to. For unknown 9999 is used
maxDatemaximum datestring (text)Date of the destruction/abandonment of the site. For unknown or continuous activity until the present 9999 is used
umayyadUmayyad periodstring (text)Whether site exists in given period. Value: ‘yes’, ‘no’, ‘unknown’, ‘possible’
abbasidAbbasid periodstring (text)Whether site exists in given period. Value: ‘yes’, ‘no’, ‘unknown’, ‘possible’
fatimidFatimid/Middle Byzantine periodstring (text)Whether site exists in given period. Value: ‘yes’, ‘no’, ‘unknown’, ‘possible’
ayyubidCruAyyubid-Crusader periodstring (text)Whether site exists in given period. Value: ‘yes’, ‘no’, ‘unknown’, ‘possible’
mamlukMamluk periodstring (text)Whether site exists in given period. Value: ‘yes’, ‘no’, ‘unknown’, ‘possible’
citationcitationstring (text)Author of the digitisation
bibliobibliographystring (text)Reference to a secondary literature that was used to identify, localise, and digitise the site. Short reference in the form ‘Name Year’ (see bibliography.md file for the full reference)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joad.231 | Journal eISSN: 2049-1565
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 23
Submitted on: Aug 17, 2026
Accepted on: Oct 7, 2026
Published on: Oct 21, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Adam Pažout, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.