Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Database of Pictorial Evidence of Aquatic Animals and Fishing Practices in Prehistoric Japan Cover

A Database of Pictorial Evidence of Aquatic Animals and Fishing Practices in Prehistoric Japan

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Periodisation and approximate dates used in the database. Based on Barnes [20].

PERIODGENERIC PERIODDATE RANGE BCE/CE
PalaeolithicPalaeolithicUp to 14,520 BCE
Incipient JōmonJōmon/Neolithic14,520–10,550 BCE
Initial JōmonJōmon/Neolithic10,550–5050 BCE
Early JōmonJōmon/Neolithic5050–3520 BCE
Middle JōmonJōmon Neolithic3520–2470 BCE
Late JōmonJōmon/Neolithic2470–1250 BCE
Final Jōmon (southwest Japan)Jōmon/Neolithic1250–970 BCE
Final Jōmon (northeast Japan)Jōmon/Neolithic1250–400 BCE
Initial YayoiYayoi-Kofun1000–800 BCE
Early YayoiYayoi-Kofun800–450 BCE
Middle YayoiYayoi-Kofun450 BCE–50 CE
Late YayoiYayoi-Kofun50–250 CE
Early KofunYayoi-Kofun50–400 CE
Middle KofunYayoi-Kofun400–500 CE
Late KofunYayoi-Kofun500–710 CE
Epi-Jōmon (Hokkaidō)Yayoi-Kofun340 BCE–700 CE
OkhotskMedieval Hokkaido500–1000 CE
SatsumonMedieval Hokkaido600–1200 CE
joad-13-182-g1.png
Figure 1

Distribution of sites listed in the database.

joad-13-182-g2.jpg
Figure 2

Three shark species identified in Japanese publications on prehistoric art: (A) Hammerhead shark (Sphyrna spp.), (B) Shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus), and (C) Blue shark (Prionace glauca). (Illustrations from Wikimedia Commons, not to the same scale)

joad-13-182-g3.jpg
Figure 3

Three fish species identified in Japanese publications on prehistoric art: (D) masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou), (E) bonito (Katsuwonus pelamis), and (F) mullet (Mugil cephalus or other related species). (Illustrations from Wikimedia Commons, not to the same scale)

joad-13-182-g4.jpg
Figure 4

Two gastropod shell types identified in Japanese publications on prehistoric art: (G) conch shell (Family Charoniidae), (H) cone shell (Family Conidae), and (I) abalone shell (Family Haliotidae). (Photos from Wikimedia Commons, not to the same scale)

Table 2

List of data columns included in the database.

FIELDDESCRIPTIONVALUE
Unique IDA numerical identifier assigned to each representation for unique referencing. This identifier ensures efficient data retrieval and sorting within the datasetE.g., ID001, ID002, ID003
Depiction typeCategorises the depictionAA = Animal Alone; F = fishing scene
ImageThe visual representation under analysis taken from the sources consulted
Zoological InterpretationIdentification of the depicted animal based on the existing literature
Media descriptionDescription of the medium used, providing more context about the materialPottery or pottery fragment; clay figurine; rock and tomb art; stone objects or tablets; bone or antler object; bronze and iron swords; wooden board; clay bead; sea mammal tooth; haniwa clay sculpture; bronze mirror; iron helmet; bronze bell (dōtaku).
Representation techniqueCategorises the technique used in the creation of the representationIncised; painted; carved; relief; sculptured; cast.
Functional contextA brief description of the potential functional role or cultural significance of the depiction or the object based on previous studiesRitualistic; funerary; decorative; utilitarian.
DimensionsDimensions of the medium or the objectRecorded in centimetres. Divided into three columns (length, width and height). Where necessary, further details are given in the notes column.
PeriodCultural-historical period associated with each recordE.g., Middle Jōmon, Early Yayoi, Late Kofun
Maximum time rangeThe oldest possible date range for the representation
Minimum time rangeThe most recent date range for the representation
SiteThe name of the archaeological site where the entry was found
Site name in JapaneseThe name of the archaeological site in Japanese characters
Site typeClassification of the site helping to contextualise the depiction within its archaeological environmentSettlement, burial site, ritual site, mounded tomb (kofun).
Town/CityThe modern town or city where the archaeological site is located
PrefectureThe administrative region in Japan where the site is located
RegionThe larger geographical region of Japan in which the site is situated, i.e., Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Chubu, Hokuriku, Chugoku, Kinki, Kyushu. (As shown in Fig. 1, there were no examples from Shikoku).
LatitudeThe latitude of the archaeological site. Latitudes follow those given in the published site reports in WGS 84 format. In cases where geographic coordinates were not published, the location was estimated from Google Maps.
LongitudeThe longitude of the archaeological site. Longitudes follow those given in the published site reports in WGS 84 format. In cases where geographic coordinates were not published, the location was estimated from Google Maps.
Image SourceThe publication or database from which the image was obtained
ReferenceA citation of the source from which the data has been drawn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joad.182 | Journal eISSN: 2049-1565
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2025
Published on: Dec 11, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Claudia Zancan, Martijn Knapen, Dimitra Mylona, Ilona R. Bausch, Ricardo Fernandes, Carlo Cocozza, Martine Robbeets, Mark Hudson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.