References
- 1Mara H, Homburg T. MaiCuBeDa Hilprecht – Mainz Cuneiform Benchmark Dataset for the Hilprecht Collection; 2023. DOI: 10.11588/DATA/QSNIQ2
- 2van Dijk JJA, Geller MJ, Oelsner J. Ur III Incantations from the Frau Professor Hilprecht-Collection, Jena. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag; vol. 6. 2003
- 3Ahlborn L, Homburg T. MaiCuBeDa HT; 2025. DOI: 10.11588/DATA/8TCR5C
- 4Bogacz B, Mara H. Digital Assyriology – Advances in Visual Cuneiform Analysis. JOCCH; 2022. DOI: 10.1145/3491239
- 5Hameeuw H, Graef KD, Smidt GR, Goddeeris A, Homburg T, Chandrasekar KKT. Preparing multi-layered visualisations of Old Babylonian cuneiform tablets for a machine learning OCR training model towards automated sign recognition. It – Information Technology. 2024;65:229–42. DOI: 10.1515/itit-2023-0063
- 6Mara H, Krömker S, Jakob S, Breuckmann B. GigaMesh and gilgamesh: –3D multiscale integral invariant cuneiform character extraction. Proceedings of the 11th International conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage; 2010. pp. 131–8. DOI: 10.2312/VAST/VAST10/131-138
- 7Brandes T, Prechel D. Keilschrifttexte aus Haft Tappeh (KHT) der Ausgrabungen zwischen 2005 und 2012 Teil 1. Elamica 12,
2022 . - 8Brandes T, Prechel D. Keilschrifttexte aus Haft Tappeh (KHT) der Ausgrabungen zwischen 2005 und 2012 Teil 2. Elamica 13,
2022 . - 9Mara H. HeiCuBeDa Hilprecht – Heidelberg Cuneiform Benchmark Dataset for the Hilprecht Collection; 2019. DOI: 10.11588/DATA/IE8CCN
- 10Effinger M, Wolf T. HeidICON-Die zentrale Bilddatenbank der Universität Heidelberg. Theke Informationsblatt Der Mitarbeiterinnen Und Mitarbeiter Im Bibliothekssystem; 2005. pp. 18–25.
- 11Kellogg G, Longley D, Champin P-A.
JSON-LD 1.1 . W3C; 2020. - 12Sanderson R, Young B, Ciccarese P.
Web Annotation Data Model . W3C; 2017. - 13Brinza B, Willigers E, Bellamy-Royds A, Schulze D, Lilley C, Storey D.
Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 2 . W3C; 2018. - 14Snydman S, Sanderson R, Cramer T. The International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF): A community & technology approach for web-based images. Archiving conference. Society for Imaging Science and Technology. 2015;12:16–21. DOI: 10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2015.12.1.art00005
- 15Lanthaler M, Cyganiak R, Wood D.
RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax . W3C; 2014. - 16Boutell T. PNG (Portable Network Graphics) Specification Version 1.0; 1997. DOI: 10.17487/rfc2083
- 17Kellogg G, Champin P-A, Longley D. JSON-LD 1.1 | W3C Recommendation; 2020.
https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/ . - 18Shafranovich Y. Rfc 4180: Common format and mime type for comma-separated values (csv) files. The International Society. 2005;54:
258 . DOI: 10.17487/rfc4180 - 19Carothers G, Prud’hommeaux E. RDF 1.1 Turtle. W3C; 2014.
- 20Stötzner E, Homburg T, Bullenkamp JP, Mara H. R-CNN based PolygonalWedge Detection Learned from Annotated 3D Renderings and Mapped Photographs of Open Data Cuneiform Tablets; 2023. DOI: 10.1109/ICCVW60793.2023.00183
- 21Stötzner E, Homburg T, Mara H. CNN based Cuneiform Sign Detection Learned from Annotated 3D Renderings and Mapped Photographs with Illumination Augmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision; 2023. pp. 1680–8. DOI: 10.1109/ICCVW60793.2023.00183
- 22Yugay V, Paliwal K, Cobanoglu Y, Sáenz L, Gogokhia E, Gordin S, et al. Stylistic classification of cuneiform signs using convolutional neural networks. It – Information Technology. 2024;66:15–27. DOI: 10.1515/itit-2023-0114
- 23Cobanoglu Y, Sáenz L, Khait I, Jiménez E. Sign detection for cuneiform tablets. It – Information Technology. 2024;66:28–38. DOI: 10.1515/itit-2024-0028
- 24Rest C, Fisseler D, Weichert F, Somel T, Müller GGW. Illumination-based Augmentation for Cuneiform Deep Neural Sign Classification. J Comput Cult Herit; 2022. p.
15 . DOI: 10.1145/3495263 - 25Chen D, Agarwal A, Berg-Kirkpatrick T, Myerston J. CuneiML: A Cuneiform Dataset for Machine Learning. Journal of Open Humanities Data; 2023. DOI: 10.5334/johd.151
- 26Bogacz B, Mara H. Period Classification of 3D Cuneiform Tablets with Geometric Neural Networks. 17th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR), Dortmund, Germany; 2020. pp. 246–251. DOI: 10.1109/ICFHR2020.2020.00053
- 27Jauhiainen T, Jauhiainen H, Alstola T, Lindén K. Language and Dialect Identification of Cuneiform Texts. In: Zampieri M, Nakov P, Malmasi S, Ljubešić N, Tiedemann J, Ali A, editors. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects, Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019. pp. 89–98. DOI: 10.18653/v1/W19-1409
- 28Paetzold GH, Zampieri M.
Experiments in Cuneiform Language Identification . In: Zampieri M, Nakov P, Malmasi S, Ljubešić N, Tiedemann J, Ali A, editors. Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019. pp. 209–13. DOI: 10.18653/v1/W19-1423 - 29Homan ZS. Mittani Palaeography. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill; 2019. DOI: 10.1163/9789004417243
- 30Gordin S. Hittite Scribal Circles: Scholarly Tradition and Writing Habits. Harrassowitz Verlag; 2015. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvc76zpc
- 31Homburg T. PaleoCodage – Enhancing machine-readable cuneiform descriptions using a machine-readable paleographic encoding. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 2021;36:ii127–54. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqab038
- 32Stelzer DM. A recursive encoding for cuneiform signs. It – Information Technology. 2024;66:232–55. DOI: 10.1515/itit-2024-0067
- 33Gottstein N. Ein stringentes identifikations-und suchsystem für keilschriftzeichen. Mitteilungen Der Deutschen Orientgesellschaft, Berlin.