Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Catalogue of British Bronze Age Axes, Including Basic Typology, Compositional Analyses and Associated Radiocarbon Dates Cover

A Catalogue of British Bronze Age Axes, Including Basic Typology, Compositional Analyses and Associated Radiocarbon Dates

Open Access
|Oct 2024

Full Article

(1) Overview

Context

This archive gathers information from a range of disparate sources to provide a near comprehensive listing of flat, flanged and palstave axeheads from Bronze Age Britain. In particular, it combines two major existing digital datasets on Bronze Age axes: (a) the British Museum’s National Bronze Implement Index (BM-NBII, first collected as a card catalogue from 1913 until the 1980s, and then transcribed online by MicroPasts crowdsourcing contributors, see [1]), and (b) the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS, https://finds.org.uk/). The BM-NBII was meant to offer a listing of all known Bronze Age metal objects from various museums and collections across the UK. The BM-NBII axehead finds discussed here (n = 2511) were recovered in a wide range of ways, but the following discovery circumstances are common: agriculture (14.6% of 882 known circumstances), road and rail (14.6%), drainage and dredging (13.8%) and quarrying (11.2%). The PAS is a national effort at voluntary recording of those archaeological artefacts found by members of the public, but most of the PAS finds axeheads considered here (n = 1808) are from metal-detecting (>99%) and subject to well-known spatial biases of recovery ([2, 3]). The current listing adds a very considerable number of further axeheads (n = 3672), including typologies, bibliography and cross-references from major published catalogues (e.g. Rowlands 1976; O’Connor 1981; Schmidt and Burgess 1981; Needham 1983), as well as basic coordinate information, a consistent, basic typological classification and any known compositional, isotopic or radiocarbon analyses. The current archive began life as an output from the MicroPasts crowdsourcing project limited to the BM-NBII, but has received considerable further input from the lead author, building on advice, specific inputs and/or previous work from co-authors. The academic motivations behind the creation of such an archive are also diverse, ranging from a desire to extend the current scope of the PAS to include previous legacy metalwork lists, a wish to refine the MicroPasts crowdsourcing transcriptions of BM-NBII catalogue cards by harmonising it with other corpora, and a pressing need to establish unique identifiers and baseline information for each axehead in order to support future analysis of shape, composition, typology, etc.

Spatial coverage

Description: England, Scotland and Wales

Northern boundary: 58.5645

Southern boundary: 49.4133

Eastern boundary: 1.7381

Western boundary: –6.2668

Temporal coverage

2450 BCE – 800 BCE

(2) Methods

Steps

As noted above, we have combined two major existing digital datasets on Bronze Age axes: (a) the British Museum’s National Bronze Implement Index transcribed online by MicroPasts crowdsourcing contributors, and (b) the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS, see above for references). These two sources do not overlap except in rare cases. All known major published catalogues of axes were then inputted by hand (especially [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]), cross-referenced (e.g. by cross-matching catalogue numbers and museum accessions) and harmonised (e.g. with regard to dimensions, provenance, museum accession, etc.) with the above BM-NBII and PAS data. Additional individual finds were added from smaller publications wherever known, and further cross-referencing and checks were done via online museum catalogues, Heritage Gateway (https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/gateway/) and Canmore (https://canmore.org.uk/). Three major sources of existing chemical analytical data (Northover database of analyses from Wales, Bray’s synthetic database from the FLAME project, and the BBA database at the British Museum) were harmonised and then extended via further attention to other relevant publications (e.g. [12] for most of the isotopic analysis). Associated radiocarbon dates were taken initially from [13] and extended via attention to a few more recent samples.

Sampling strategy

We have sought to be exhaustive in our data collection of all known Bronze Age flat, flanged and palstave axes across England, Scotland and Wales (n = 7991), with attention to new finds up to the end of 2022. In addition, any associated elemental analyses (n = 1316), isotopic measurements (n = 143) or radiocarbon dates (n = 24) have also been provided, with as much accompanying ancillary information as possible. Chronologically, most of the coverage spans the start of the Chalcolithic up to the end of the Middle Bronze Age (Figure 1) (2450–1150 BCE, so-called Moel Arthur to Penard metalwork assemblages), with typologically ‘Late’ palstaves (1150–950/800 BCE) of the Late Bronze Age also included because of their stylistic links with earlier examples. By contrast, Late Bronze Age and earliest Iron Age ‘socketed’ axes have been excluded entirely from data collection, due simply to the massive additional workload that would have required. Some copper and bronze axeheads were checked via direct handling and museum visits, but most are here only complied via the combination of existing secondary records.

joad-12-119-g1.jpg
Figure 1

The evolution of Bronze Age axehead styles, excluding socketed axes (image reproduced from the Archaeology Data Service repository).

Quality Control

The NBII was subject to a range of quality control measures during its compilation including oversight by, for example, Christopher Hawkes, first at the BM then at Oxford Institute of Archaeology, and Gill Varndell, Stuart Needham and others after the return of the Index to the BM in ca.1970. In general, the quality of recording, both text and line drawing, inevitably improved over the near-century of the Index’s existence but some early records are also of good quality. The UK Portable Antiquities Scheme data relies on the diligence of the original finder in reporting the find and its location and the skills and knowledge of the regional Finds Liaison Officers in recording it descriptively and photographically. In many instances, however it has been possible to cross-check PAS measurements against available photographs. A self-consistent basic typology has been provided for all axeheads (by the lead author based on consultation of photographs, drawings and measurements, as well as some museum visits) using the typological scheme devised by Needham 2017 scheme for Early Bronze Age axes, and the one devised by Schmidt and Burgess 1981 for Middle and Late Bronze Age axes. Quality control for this typology was based on cross-checks with published attributions and discussion with co-authors. Museum MDA codes were added to improve the quality of museum accession information wherever possible. The quality of findspot georeferencing has been enhanced by cross-checking for consistency across different publications, and in terms of expected overlap with GIS layers of county borders. Where the findspot already has a widely agreed 4-figure national grid reference, the longitude and latitude pair indicates the centre of this grid square in all cases, not the bottom-left.

Constraints

This archive adopts the georeferencing protocol also used by the UK Portable Antiquities Scheme in which all findspot coordinates have been degraded to the equivalent of a 4-figure national grid reference (i.e. to the nearest 1km). However, an indication is also given for each find as to whether finer resolution coordinate information might be available via further consultation with the relevant institution or published literature. It was not possible to revisit most museum collections or to cross-check with all region-level heritage environment records. A small selection of heritage environment records (HERs) were contacted for further checks and additional finds (see Acknowledgements), but only Norfolk HER involved a sustained programme of consultation, so we would expect some further unrecorded finds from other HER sources, particularly in England for the period 1980–2002 (when metal-detector finds were increasing dramatically and the PAS had yet to get underway). Drawings or photographs of the axes are in many instances available via a URL field in the main dataset, but these are not persistent links and the images themselves have not been archived (although they may be in future, if resourcing permits). This dataset is clearly also constrained by patterns of archaeological, chance-find and metal-detecting recovery (Figure 2). For example, a well-known pattern of increased recovery is associated with wetlands (e.g. in Cambridgeshire and East Anglia) and it remains difficult to know if this reflects preferred Bronze Age deposition in watery contexts, greater metalwork loss and better metal preservation in such contexts in the past, higher-intensity metal-detecting in such places in the present, or some combination thereof.

joad-12-119-g2.png
Figure 2

The distribution and kernel-smoothed spatial intensity of Bronze Age axeheads.

(3) Dataset description

Object name

earlyaxes.tsv and related files with chemical analyses, radiocarbon and bibliography.

Data type

secondary data, processed data, interpretation of data

Format names and versions

ASCII (.tsv); Excel (.xlsx)

Creation dates

2018-10-15–2023-06-15 (representing wider data collection since 1913)

Dataset Creators

Please list anyone who helped to create the database (who may also not be an author of the data paper), including their roles and affiliations.

Authors as above, but also:

Contributors to the National Bronze Implement Index (BM-NBII, the name since 1978, formerly the British Association Card Catalogue (on Bronze Implements), 1913 onwards)

Contributors to MicroPasts online crowdsourcing (transcription of National Bronze Implement Index)

Contributors to the UK Portable Antiquities Scheme, including the PAS organisers and finds liaison officers

Christopher Hawkes and his colleagues (British Museum and University of Oxford)

Individual publications of axes are cited find-by-find in the dataset itself.

Compositional analysts otherwise not directly cited including Paul Craddock, Duncan Hook, Sue LaNice and Anthony Simpson at the British Museum.

Language

English

License

CC-BY

Repository location

https://doi.org/10.5284/1122315

Publication date

20/08/2024

(4) Reuse potential

This dataset provides an unusually dense and spatially resolved record of long-term technological change in a single artefact type over at least 1500 years. It could potentially be repurposed to enable quantitative assessment of (a) changing temporal trends in axe size, shape and composition, (b) co-occurrence of metalwork style and composition or (c) spatial patterns of metalwork style, deposition and recovery, to name just a few areas. By providing a common starting point and set of consistent identifiers for each axe, it also enables more systematic integration of work on production marks, mould siblings, use-wear, object fragmentation and surface corrosion, for example. For those interested in similar Bronze Age axehead evidence from continental Europe, it can serve as a point of comparison and as an opportunity for further cross-Channel data aggregation. It could also support teaching efforts across topics such as introductory GIS, introductory multivariate statistics, advanced spatial statistics, seriation modelling, machine learning, and more.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to (a) the often-anonymous people who began compiling the British Association Card Catalogue (later renamed National Bronze Implements Index, BM-NBII) from 1913 up until the end of the century, and (b) the anonymised contributors who then helped transcribe and digitise the BM-NBII online via the MicroPasts online crowdsourcing platform between 2015 and 2019. Since 2003, members of the public have also kindly contributed Bronze Age axehead finds to (c) the UK Portable Antiquities Scheme, with the help of the PAS finds liaison officers. The following answered queries about particular finds: Lisa Brown (Wiltshire Museum), Ben Buxton (Wareham Museum), Eleanor Chadd (Spalding Museum), Agne Civilyte (Buffalo University), Rachel Clamp (Northumberland Estates), Jeremy Clarke (Guildhall Museum), Claire Costin (British Museum), Jay Cumberworth (Peterborough Museum), Christopher Evans (Cambridge Archaeological Unit), Janine Fox (West Berkshire Museum), Laine Garrett (SWAT Archaeology), Natalia Garrett (SWAT Archaeology), Adrian Green (Salisbury Museum), Philip Hadland (Hastings Museum), Harriet Haugvik (Reading Museum), Bernhard Heeb (Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte Staatliche Museen zu Berlin), Richard Henry (Southampton City Council Cultural Services), Carl Heron (British Museum), Catherine Holt (Dover Museum), Brian Howard (Halesworth and District Museum), Rhiannon Jones (Haslemere Museum), Ian Mason (Chatteris Museum), Ben McLoughlin (Powell-Cotton Museum), Andrew Mills (Hunterian Museum), Elizabeth Montgomery (West Cheshire Museums), Jacqueline Morgan (Brecon Museum), Emma Stuart and Caroline Morris (Corinium Museum), Rose Nicholson (North Lincolnshire Museum), Emma O’Connor (Museum of Sussex Archaeology), Keith Parfitt (Canterbury Archaeological Trust), Elizabeth Pieksma (Higgins Art Gallery and Museum), Bryan Popple (Bournemouth Natural Science Society), Julian Porter (Bexhill Museum), Pernille Richards (Maidstone Museum), Dan Robertson (Brighton Royal Pavilion and Museums Trust), Dawn Sellick (West Berkshire Museum), Shona Sinclair (Hawick Museum), Thurrock Museum, Ross Turle (Hampshire Cultural Trust), Sara Wear (Warwickshire Museum Service), Robin Webb (Oxford Archaeology East), Ali Wells (Herbert Art Gallery and Museum), Hannah White (Warrington Museum), Paul Wilkinson (SWAT Archaeology), Carolyn Wingfield (Saffron Walden Museum), Phil Wood (Newbury District Field Club) and Gill Woolrich (Southampton Museum). Sincere apologies if we have missed anyone out.

Funding Statement

The authors typically either volunteered their time or were supported as part of their ordinary institutional remits. However, an AHRC grant (2013–2015, AH/L007657/1) to supported early work by Bevan, Pett, Bonacchi, Keinan-Schoonbaert, Wexler and Wilkin, and enabled online crowdsourcing by volunteer members of the public, including transcription of the BM-NBII via the MicroPasts platform. Northover’s analytical work was also support by a grant from the Board of Celtic Studies. Bray’s contribution was made possible via a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/W008580/1, REMADE).

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joad.119 | Journal eISSN: 2049-1565
Language: English
Submitted on: May 20, 2024
|
Accepted on: Oct 11, 2024
|
Published on: Oct 18, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Andrew Bevan, Peter Northover, Peter Bray, Chiara Bonacchi, Sue Colledge, Rachel Crellin, Adam Gwilt, Heather Hamilton, Paul Hart, Robert Kaleta, Adi Keinan-Schoonbaert, Matthew Knight, Kathy Laws, Mark Lodwick, Marcos Martinón-Torres, Stuart Needham, Brendan O’Connor, Laura Perucchetti, Daniel Pett, Jennifer Wexler, Neil Wilkin, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.