Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Remote Live Invigilation: A Pilot Study Cover
Open Access
|Jan 2016

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Pilot Study Overview.

PhaseModuleParticipants’ Country of residence
1Level 6, BSc(Hons) Computer ScienceKenya
Saudi Arabia
Trinidad & Tobago
United Kingdom
Zambia
2Level 4, BSc(Hons) Computer ScienceEgypt
Kenya
Slovakia
United Kingdom
Table 2

Phases 1 and 2 detailed.

PhaseTestNumber of participantsTypeDurationNo. of questions
11a4Formative30 minutes20
11b8Summative30 minutes20
229Summative50 minutes40
Table 3

Feeling more supported during assessment process (N = 9).

QuestionYesNeutralNo
1. Does having a live proctor make you feel more supported should something go wrong during a test (e.g. technical problem, sickness etc.)?720
Table 4

Perceived impact of remote live invigilation on online assessment experience (N = 9).

QuestionEnhancesNeutralHinders
2. You have taken a test with a live proctor. Did you feel that having a proctor hinders or enhances online assessment in any way?270
Table 5

Participants’ perceptions as to whether the use of remote live invigilation should be extended to other modules (N = 9).

QuestionYesNeutralNo
3. Do you think we should use remote live invigilation in other modules?801
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.408 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Language: English
Published on: Jan 19, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Mariana Lilley, Jonathan Meere, Trevor Barker, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.