Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Metacognition in Relation to Cognitive and Social Functioning in Schizophrenia Cover

Metacognition in Relation to Cognitive and Social Functioning in Schizophrenia

Open Access
|Nov 2015

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic and illness characteristics.

Demographic variableNMSDMinMax
Gender
      Men36
      Women16
Diagnosis
      Schizophrenia45
      Schizoaffective Disorder7
First episode psychosis25
Years since onset of the disorder13.0611.38045
Age in years38.0411.282259
Table 2

Descriptive statistics of cognition, metacognition, and social functioning.

MSDMinMax
Social Functioning
      PSP57.215.32580
Cognitive Functioning
      TMT-A17.721.4066
      TMT-B20.224.9088
      DSST12.215.1063
Metacognition
      MAS Overall10.72.73.516.0
      MAS Understanding Self4.11.01.56.5
      MAS Understanding Others2.60.90.55.0
      MAS Decentration1.10.60.03.0
      MAS Mastery2.91.30.05.0
Table 3

Correlations between social functioning, cognitive functioning and metacognition tests.

SocialCognitionMetacognition Scales
PSPTMTATMTBDSSTOverallSUDM
Social
      PSP
Cogn.
      TMT-A−0.03
      TMT-B0.130.41**
      DSST0.060.38**0.37**
Metacog.
      Overall0.14−0.070.000.16
      Scale S−0.01−0.07−0.020.100.79**
      Scale U0.24−0.17−0.040.050.71**0.44**
      Scale D0.27−0.18−0.020.120.56**0.28*0.48*
      Scale M0.020.110.060.170.76**0.46**0.260.20

Note. Metacognition scales: S = understanding of oneself, U = understanding of others, D = decentration, M = mastery. * p < .05 (two-tailed); ** p < .01 (two-tailed).

Table 4

Correlations of symptom severity with metacognition.

Metacognition
OverallSUDM
Positive symptom severity−0.08−0.01−0.21−0.070.02
Negative symptom severity−0.33*−0.11−0.38**−0.27−0.24
General symptom severity0.110.250.01−0.130.08
Total symptom severity−0.080.09−0.20−0.19−0.03

Note. Metacognition scales: S = understanding of oneself, U = understanding of others, D = decentration, M = mastery. * p < .05 (two-tailed); ** p < .01 (two-tailed).

Table 5

Principle components analysis loadings for neurocognitive variables.

Factor loadings
Trail Making Test A0.78
Trail Making Test B0.77
Digit Symbol Substitution Test0.76

Note. Eigenvalue = 1.77.

Figure 1

Mediation model, depicting the total effect of cognitive functioning on social functioning, with metacognition added into the model. Path coefficients represent beta weights and p-values. None of the beta weight is significant at an alpha level of .05.

Figure 2

Mediation model, with all four metacognition subscales added as parallel mediators. Path coefficients represent beta weights and p-values. None of the beta weight is significant at an alpha level of .05.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.df | Journal eISSN: 2222-6931
Language: English
Page range: 24 - 33
Published on: Nov 23, 2015
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2015 Rozemarijn S van Kleef, Rozanne J.M van Donkersgoed, Steven de Jong, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.