
”Small but Mighty”: Conditions for Prototypicality Claims Within Low-Status Merger Partners
References
- Butera F. Levine J. M. Coping with minority status: Responses to exclusion and inclusion 2009 New York Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511804465
- Ellemers N. Pagliaro S. Barreto M. Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach European Review of Social Psychology 2014 24 1 160 193 10.1080/10463283.2013.841490
-
Giessner
S. R.
Ullrich
J.
van Dick
R.
Faulkner
D.
Teerikangas
S.
Joseph
R.
A Social Identity Analysis of Mergers & Acquisitions The Handbook of Mergers and Acquisitions 2012 Oxford Oxford University Press 474 495 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601462.003.0019 - Giessner S. R. Viki G. T. Otten S. Terry D. J. Täuber S. The challenge of merging: Merger patterns, premerger status, and merger support Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006 32 3 339 352 10.1177/0146167205282151
-
Guerra
R.
António
R.
Deegan
M.
Gaertner
S. L.
Are we indispensable? How inclusive national identities impact majority and minority groups
Paper presented at the meeting “Doing Citizenship in Multi- Cultural and Multi-Faith Societies”
2013
London
Kingston University - Haslam S. Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach 2012 2nd Ed. London Sage
-
Jost
J. T.
Elsbach
K. D.
Hogg
M. A.
Terry
D. J.
How status and power differences erode personal and social identities at work: A system justification critique of organizational applications of social identity theory Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts 2001 Philadelphia, PA Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis 181 196 - Leach C. W. Ellemers N. Barreto M. Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007 93 234 249 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
- Leach C. W. van Zomeren M. Zebel S. Vliek M. Pennekamp S. F. Doosje B. Spears R. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008 95 144 165 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
- Ritcher A. West M. A. van Dick R. Dawson J. F. Boundary Spanners’ Identification, Intergroup Contact and Effective Intergroup Relations Academy of Management Journal 2006 49 1252 69 10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478720
- Rosa M. The beame in thine owne eye: Motivational underpinnings of ethnocentric prototypicality judgments in secure and insecure intergroup relations. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis 2011 ISCTE-Lisbon University Institute
- Rosa M. Waldzus S. Efficiency and defense motivated ingroup projection: Sources of protoypicality in intergroup relations Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012 48 3 669 681 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.004
- van Knippenberg D. van Knippenberg B. Monden L. de Lima F. Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective The British Journal of Social Psychology 2002 41 233 252
- Waldzus S. Mummendey A. Wenzel M. When ‘‘different’’ means ‘‘worse’’: In-group prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005 41 76 83
- Wenzel M. Mummendey A. Waldzus S. Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model European Review of Social Psychology 2007 18 331 372 10.1080/10463280701728302
-
Yzerbyt
V. Y.
Corneille
O.
Dovidio
J. F.
Glick
P.
Rudman
L.
Cognitive process: Reality constraints and integrity concerns in social perception On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport 2005 Oxford, UK Blackwell 175 191 10.1002/9780470773963.ch11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.cy | Journal eISSN: 2222-6931
Language: English
Page range: 70 - 74
Published on: Jul 22, 2015
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2015 Ivan Gorski, Sylwia Jarosz, Eithne Kavanagh, Anna-Maria Kersting, Pavel Kounov, Katarina Veličković, Miriam Rosa, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.