Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder among Danish Soldiers 2.5 Years after Military Deployment in Afghanistan: The Role of Personality Traits as Predisposing Risk Factors Cover

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder among Danish Soldiers 2.5 Years after Military Deployment in Afghanistan: The Role of Personality Traits as Predisposing Risk Factors

Open Access
|Feb 2015

Figures & Tables

Table 1

PCL-C scores among the soldiers measured before deployment, at homecoming and 2.5 years after homecoming (n = 445).

Before deployment
(December 2008 – January 2009)
At homecoming
(August 2009)
2.5 years after homecoming
(March 2012 – October 2012)
Soldiers with PCL-C score
17–29
393
(88.3%)
403
(90.6%)
330
(74.2%)
Soldiers with PCL-C score
30–43
39
(8.8%)
34
(7.6%)
74
(16.6%)
Soldiers with PCL-C score
>44
13
(2.9%)
8
(1.8%)
41
(9.2%)

[i] Note. Soldiers with PCL-C score 17–29 are characterized by none or few PTSD symptoms, soldiers with PCL-C score 30–43 are characterized by some PTSD symptoms and soldiers with PCL-C score > 44 are characterized by intense PTSD symptoms corresponding to a PTSD diagnosis (Blanchard et al., 1996).

Figure 1

The development in PCL-C scores for the three groups of soldiers with a ‘low’, ‘moderate’ and ‘high’ PCL-C score 2.5 years after homecoming.

Table 2

Test for differences in PCL scores among male soldiers 2.5 years after homecoming between the five domains of the NEO FFI.

N = 432Spearman’s rho correlation coefficientp-value
Neuroticism.290***< .001
Extraversion-.037.449
Agreeableness-.184**< .001
Conscientiousness-.117.160
Openness to Experience.059.222

[i] Note. ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

Figure 2

Correlation between PCL-C 2.5 years after homecoming and the personality traits of neuroticism and agreeableness measured before deployment (NEO FFI).

Table 3

Test for other risk factors with correlation to the development of PTSD symptoms 2.5 years after homecoming (tests performed on the ungrouped PCL-C).

NSpearman’s rho correlation coefficientSpearman’s rho p-value
Measurements before deployment
Age in years427-.125**.010
Educational status (with or without lower secondary school leaving examination)424-.157***< .001
Terms of employment (short term or permanent employment)424-.099*.042
Years employed in the Danish Defence379.081.121
Previously deployed to international duty (yes/no)423.051.089
Combat soldier-status (yes/no)426.115*.017
Traumatic events (TLEQ)370.248***< .001
Physical punishment during childhood (5 options from ‘never’ to ‘more than 5 times’380.156**.002
Witnessing violence during childhood (5 options from ‘never’ to ‘more than 5 times’379.189***< .001
Nonconsensual sexual relations during childhood (5 options from ‘never’ to ‘more than 5 times’380.048.172
Social support (MPSSS)358.079.114
Depression score (BDI II)372.068.253
PTSD symptom score (PCL-C)423.235***< .001
Received help from psychologist/psychiatrist before deployment (yes/no)378.225***< .001
Measurement at homecoming (including subjective assessment of mission-related stressors)
Combat exposure (CES)320.014.441
Hurt or injured during deployment (yes/no)339.056.783
Subjective appraisal of exposure to injury during deployment (five options from ‘very low’ to ‘very high’ probability)338.080.144
Subjective appraisal of general risk during deployment (5 options from ‘low’ to ‘high’ risk)336.088.109
Number of experienced situations with emotional strain during deployment (‘never’ to ‘often’)338.079.114
Subjective appraisal of life danger for oneself or others during deployment (yes/no)334.379.125
Killed one or more enemies (5 options from ‘never’ to ‘51 or more’)328.176***< .001
Social support (MPSSS)336.076.097
Never felt attached to another person (5 options ranging from ‘totally disagree’ to ‘absolutely agree’)343.155**.004
Feeling lonely (5 options ranging from ‘not at all’ to ‘very much’)344.166**.002
Measurements 2.5 years after homecoming
Traumatic events after homecoming (TLEQ)423.180***< .001
Deployment since homecoming (yes/no).423.089.118
Social support (MPSSS)424.186***< .001

[i] Note. * p ≤ .5, ** p ≤ .01, *** p ≤ .001; Sample sizes differ due to a varying number of soldiers responding on the different questionnaires. Furthermore as described in the method section, the response rate decreased considerably at homecoming.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.cp | Journal eISSN: 2222-6931
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 9
Published on: Feb 5, 2015
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2015 Janne Hellerup Nielsen, Soeren Bo Andersen, Annie Hogh, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.