Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unfamiliar voice identification: Effect of post-event information on accuracy and voice ratings Cover

Unfamiliar voice identification: Effect of post-event information on accuracy and voice ratings

Open Access
|Apr 2014

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The effect of stimulus type (male or female voice) and false information on ratings of voice pitch, with two-tiered CI for mean pitch ratings. The outer tier (thin lines) depicts a 95% CI for the individual mean. The inner tier (thick lines) is adjusted so that means with intervals that do not overlap are different with approximately 95% confidence.

Voice featureMale targetFemale Target
Mean95% Confidence Interval for MeanMean95% Confidence Interval for Mean
LowerUpperLowerUpper
Age28.06(4.29)27.0529.0626.89(4.40)25.8527.92
Rate of speech5.43(1.22)5.145.725.65(1.34)5.345.97
Rate variation5.35(2.39)4.795.914.83(1.88)4.395.28
Pitch4.87(1.49)4.525.236.25(1.26)5.956.55
Pitch variation3.90(2.04)3.424.384.43(1.74)4.024.84
Expressive style3.26(2.06)2.783.754.75(2.00)4.285.22
Enunciation5.60(1.99)5.136.076.01(1.83)5.586.44
Inflection3.93(2.02)3.464.404.88(1.78)4.465.29
Tremor4.13(2.23)3.604.654.51(1.91)4.074.96
Pauses4.67(2.26)4.135.204.32(2.06)3.844.80
Nasality4.04(2.14)3.544.543.53(2.02)3.054.00
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.bs | Journal eISSN: 2222-6931
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 68
Published on: Apr 11, 2014
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2014 Harriet Mary Jessica Smith, Thom Baguley, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.