Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Registered Replication Report: Testing Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Visual-Spatial Working Memory Cover

Registered Replication Report: Testing Disruptive Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Visual-Spatial Working Memory

Open Access
|Apr 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Effects of irrelevant speech on error rates per sound type condition (changing state vs. steady state vs. silent control condition) and serial position (1–7) in the spatial task condition of Experiment 4 by Jones et al. (1995; left panel) and the present replication study (right panel).

Table 1

Effects sizes and test statistics of Jones et al. (1995) and of the present replication study.

Effect or comparisonJones et al. (1995)Replication
Effect SizeTest statisticEffect sizeTest statistic
Main effect of sound typeη2p = .27F(2, 68) = 12.36, p < .001η2p = .020F(2, 78) = 0.807, p = .450
Difference between changing and steady state conditionsη2p = .16F(1, 68) = 12.78, p < .001η2p = .037t(39) = –1.222, p = .229

[i] Note. Effect sizes from Jones et al. (1995) were converted from the test statistics provided in the original paper using methods described in Lakens (2013).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.450 | Journal eISSN: 2222-6931
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 15
Published on: Apr 6, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Tatiana Kvetnaya, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.