Examining the Complexity of Police Officers’ Language During Investigative Interviews with Adults and Youth
References
- Bala, N. (2003). Youth criminal justice law. Toronto: Irwin Law.
- Campbell, K. (2005). Understanding Youth Justice in Canada. Toronto: Pearson Education.
- Canada Department of Justice. (1998). A strategy for youth justice renewal. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.
- Eastwood, J., Snook, B., & Luther, K. (2012). Measuring the Reading Complexity and Oral Comprehension of Canadian Youth Waiver Forms. Crime & Delinquency, 61(6), 1–31. DOI: 10.1177/0011128712453689
- Eastwood, J., Snook, B., & Luther, K. (2014). On the Need to Ensure Better Comprehension of Interrogation Rights. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 18, 171–181. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.1774.4004
- Ellis, L., Beaver, K. M., & Wright, J. (2009). Handbook of Crime Correlates. Cambridge: Academic Press.
- Fitzsimmons, P. R., Michael, B. D., Hulley, J. L., & Scott, G. O. (2010). A readability assessment of online Parkinson’s disease information. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 40, 292–296. DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2010.401
- Foley, R. M. (2001). Academic characteristics of incarcerated youth and correctional education programs: A literature review. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9(4), 248–259. DOI: 10.1177/106342660100900405
- Government of Canada. (2002, February 19). Youth Criminal Justice Act. Retrieved from Justice Laws Website:
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/Y-1.5/FullText.html . - Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 193–202. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195564
- Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count, and Flesch reading ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Memphis: Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch. DOI: 10.21236/ADA006655
- Markwart, A., & Corrado, R. (1989).
Is the Young Offenders Act more punitive? In: Beaulieu, L (ed.), Young offender dispositions: Perspectives on principles and practice. Toronto: Wall and Thompson. - McLaughlin, H. G. (1969). SMOG Grading – A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639–646. Retrieved from:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40011226 - Nippold, M. A., Hesketh, L. J., Duthie, J. K., & Mansfield, T. C. (2005). Conversational versus expository discourse: A study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1048–1064. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/073)
- Paasche-Orlow, M., Taylor, H., & Brancati, F. (2003). Reliability standard for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 721–727. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212
- Rogers, R., Blackwood, H., Fiduccia, C., Steadham, J. A., Drogin, E., & Rogstad, J. (2012). Juvenile Miranda warnings: Perfunctory rituals or procedural safeguards? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 229–249. DOI: 10.1177/0093854811431934
- Savage, R. (2001). The “simple view” of reading: Some evidence and possible implications. Educational Psychology in Practice, 17, 17–33. DOI: 10.1080/02667360120039951
- Snowling, M. J., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C., & Tobin, V. (2000). Levels of literacy among juvenile offenders: The incidence of specific reading difficulties. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10(4), 229–241. DOI: 10.1002/cbm.362
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.444 | Journal eISSN: 2222-6931
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 47
Published on: Dec 12, 2018
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2018 Meagan I. McCardle, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.