Construal Level Theory and Moral Judgments: How Thinking Abstractly Modifies Morality

Erika Mårtensson

doi:10.5334/jeps.413

Construal Level Theory and Moral Judgments: How Thinking Abstractly Modifies Morality

Journal of European Psychology Students

Volume 8 (2017): Issue 1

By: Erika Mårtensson

Open Access

|Dec 2017

Agerström J. Björklund F. Moral concerns are greater for temporally distant events and are moderated by value strength Social Cognition 2009a 27 2 261 282 10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.261
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agerström J. Björklund F. Temporal distance and moral concerns: Future morally questionable behavior is perceived as more wrong and evokes stronger prosocial intentions Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2009b 31 1 49 59 10.1080/01973530802659885
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agerström J. Björklund F. Why people with an eye toward the future are more moral: The role of abstract thinking Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2013 35 4 373 381 10.1080/01973533.2013.803967
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agerström J. Björklund F. Allwood C. M. The influence of temporal distance on justice and care morality Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2010 51 1 46 55 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00724.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agerström J. Björklund F. Carlsson R. Emotions in time: Moral emotions appear more intense with temporal distance Social Cognition 2012 30 2 181 198 10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.181
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Agerström J. Björklund F. Carlsson R. Look at yourself! Visual perspective influences moral judgment by level of mental construal Social Psychology 2013 44 1 42 46 10.1027/1864-9335/a000100
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bar-Anan Y. Liberman N. Trope Y. The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an Implicit Association Test Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006 135 4 609 622 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blair R. J. R. A cognitive developmental-approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath Cognition 1995 57 1 1 29 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-P
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boroditsky L. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time Cognitive Psychology 2001 43 1 1 22 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Choi S. Y. Park H. S. Oh J. Y. Temporal distance and blood donation intention Journal of Health Psychology 2012 17 4 590 599 10.1177/1359105311421048
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eyal T. Liberman N. Mikulincer M. Shaver P. R. Morality and psychological distance: A construal level theory perspective The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil 2012 Washington, DC American Psychological Association 185 202 10.1037/13091-010
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eyal T. Liberman N. Trope Y. Judging near and distant virtue and vice Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008 44 4 1204 1209 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eyal T. Liberman N. Trope Y. Thinking of why a transgression occurred may draw attention to extenuating circumstances: A comment on Žeželj and Jokić replication Social Psychology 2014 45 4 329 331 10.1027/1864-9335/a000206
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Freitas A. L. Gollwitzer P. Trope Y. The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2004 40 6 739 752 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fujita K. Trope Y. Liberman N. Levin-Sagi M. Construal levels and self-control Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006 90 3 351 367 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Giacomantonio M. de Dreu C. W. Shalvi S. Sligte D. Leder S. Psychological distance boosts value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010 46 5 824 829 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gilead M. Liberman N. Maril A. The language of future-thought: An fMRI study of embodiment and tense processing Neuroimage 2013 65 267 279 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.073
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gong H. Medin D. L. Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications Judgment and Decision Making 2012 7 51 628 638
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gong H. Medin D. L. Commentaries and rejoinder on Žeželj and Jokić Social Psychology 2014 45 4 327 334 10.1027/1864-9335/a000206
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green L. Myerson J. Macaux E. W. Temporal discounting when the choice is between two delayed rewards Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 2005 31 5 1121 1133 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1121
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Greenwald A. G. McGhee D. E. Schwartz J. L. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998 74 6 1464 1480 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment Psychological Reviews 2001 108 4 814 834 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haidt J. Graham J. When morality opposed justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize Social Justice Research 2007 20 1 98 116 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haidt J. Koller S. H. Dias M. G. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993 65 4 613 628 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.613
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hauser M. D. The liver and the moral organ Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2006 1 3 214 220 10.1093/scan/nsl026
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henderson M. D. Trope Y. The effects of abstraction on integrative agreements: When seeing the forest helps avoid getting tangled in the trees Social Cognition 2009 27 3 402 417 10.1521/soco.2009.27.3.402
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ji L. Nisbett R. E. Su Y. Culture, change, and prediction Psychological Science 2001 12 6 450 456 10.1111/1467-9280.00384
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kivetz Y. Tyler T. Tomorrow I’ll be me: The effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2007 102 2 193 211 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kohlberg L. The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice 1981 San Francisco Harper & Row
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kohlberg L. Hersh R. H. Moral development: A review of the theory Theory into Practice 1977 16 2 53 59 10.1080/00405847709542675
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kristiansen C. M. Hotte A. Seligman C. Olson J. M. Zanna M. P. Morality and the self: Implications for the when and how of value-attitude-behavior relations The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium 1996 Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum 77 105
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lammers J. Abstraction increases hypocrisy Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012 48 2 475 480 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Libby L. K. Shaeffer E. M. Eibach R. P. Seeing meaning in action: A bidirectional link between visual perspective and action identification level Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2009 138 4 503 516 10.1037/a0016795
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liberman N. Sagristano M. Trope Y. The effect of temporal distance on level of construal Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2002 38 523 535 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liberman N. Trope Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998 75 1 5 18 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liberman N. Trope Y. The psychology of transcending the here and now Science 2008 322 5905 1201 1205 10.1126/science.1161958
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liberman N. Trope Y. McCrea S. Sherman S. J. The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2007 43 1 143 149 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luguri J. B. Napier J. L. Dovidio J. F. Reconstruing intolerance: Abstract thinking reduces conservatives’ prejudice against nonnormative groups Psychological Science 2012 23 7 756 763 10.1177/0956797611433877
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mikhail J. Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007 11 4 143 152 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Napier J. L. Luguri J. B. Moral mind-sets: Abstract thinking increases a preference for ‘individualizing’ over ‘binding’ moral foundations Social Psychological and Personality Science 2013 4 6 754 759 10.1177/1948550612473783
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nordhall O. Agerström J. Future-oriented people show stronger moral concerns Current Research in Social Psychology 2013 21 6 52 63
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plaks J. E. McNichols N. K. Fortune J. L. Thoughts versus deeds: Distal and proximal intent in lay judgments of moral responsibility Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2009 35 12 1687 1701 10.1177/0146167209345529
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plaks J. E. Robinson J. S. Construal level and free will beliefs shape perceptions of actors’ proximal and distal intent Frontiers in Psychology 2015 6 777 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00777
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prehn K. Wartenburger I. Mériau K. Scheibe C. Goodenough O. R. Villringer A. Heekeren H. R. Individual differences in moral judgment competence influence neural correlates of socio-normative judgments Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2008 3 1 33 46 10.1093/scan/nsm037
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pronin E. Olivola C. Y. Kennedy K. A. Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008 34 2 224 236 10.1177/0146167207310023
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pronin E. Ross L. Temporal differences in trait self-ascription: When the self is seen as an other Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006 90 2 197 209 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.197
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reeder G. D. Mindreading: Judgments about intentionality and motives in dispositional inference Psychological Inquiry 2009 20 1 1 18 10.1080/10478400802615744
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rixom J. Mishra H. Ethical ends: Effect of abstract mindsets in ethical decisions for the greater social good Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2014 124 110 121 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.02.001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sachdeva S. Singh P. Medin D. Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning International Journal of Psychology 2011 46 3 161 176 10.1080/00207594.2011.568486
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Strathman A. Gleicher F. Boninger D. S. Edwards C. S. The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994 66 4 742 752 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Trope Y. Liberman N. Temporal construal Psychological Review 2003 110 403 421 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Trope Y. Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance Psychological Review 2010 117 2 440 463 10.1037/a0018963
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tumasjan A. Strobel M. Welpe I. Ethical leadership evaluations after moral transgression: Social distance makes the difference Journal of Business Ethics 2011 99 4 609 622 10.1007/s10551-010-0671-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Houwelingen G. van Dijke M. de Cremer D. Getting it done and getting it right: Leader disciplinary reactions to followers’ moral transgressions are determined by construal level mindset Leadership Quarterly 2015 26 5 878 891 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Verplanken B. Holland R. W. Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002 82 3 434 447 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wark G. R. Krebs D. L. Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgment Developmental Psychology 1996 32 2 220 230 10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.220
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yi R. Charlton S. Porter C. Carter A. E. Bickel W. K. Future altruism: Social discounting of delayed rewards Behavioural Processes 2011 86 1 160 163 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.09.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Žeželj I. L. Jokić B. R. Replication of experiments evaluating impact of psychological distance on moral judgment (Eyal et al., 2008; Gong & Medin, 2012) Social Psychology 2014a 45 3 223 231 10.1027/1864-9335/a000188
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Žeželj I. L. Jokić B. R. A rejoinder to comments by Eyal, Liberman, & Trope and Gong & Medin Social Psychology 2014b 45 4 332 334
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zimbardo P. G. Boyd J. N. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999 77 6 1271 1288 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article