Registered Reports for Student Research
References
-
Bishop
D.
Why we need pre-registration [Web log comment]
2013
July
26
Retrieved from
http://deevybee.blogspot.ie/2013/07/why-we-need-pre-registration.html - Button K. S. Ioannidis J. P. Mokrysz C. Nosek B. A. Flint J. Robinson E. S. Munafò M. R. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2013 14 5 365 376 10.1038/nrn3475
- Cohen J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1962 65 3 145 10.1037/h0045186
-
Chambers
M.
Registered Reports: A Step Change in Scientific Publishing
2014
Elsevier
Retrieved from
http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/registered-reports-a-step-change-in-scientific-publishing -
Chambers
M.
Trust in Science would be improved by study pre-registration
The Guardian
2013
June
5
Retrieved from
http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2013/jun/05/trust-in-science-study-pre-registration -
Cortex
Guidelines for reviewers 2013 Elsevier Retrieved fromhttp://cdn.elsevier.com/promis_misc/PROMIS%20pub_idt_CORTEX%20Guidelines_RR_29_04_2013.pdf - Fraley R. C. Vazire S. The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power PloS one 2014 9 10 e109019 10.1371/journal.pone.0109019
- Frank M. C. Saxe R. Teaching replication Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012 7 6 600 604 10.1177/1745691612460686
- Groot A. D. Wagenmakers E. J. Borsboom D. Verhagen J. Kievit R. Bakker M. Maas H. L. J. The meaning of” significance” for different types of research Acta Psychologica 2014 148 188 194 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001
- Gelman A. Carlin J. Beyond power calculations: Assessing type S (sign) and type M (magnitude) errors Perspectives on Psychological Science 2014 9 6 641 651 10.1177/1745691614551642
- Gelman A. Loken E. The Statistical Crisis in Science American Scientist 2014 102 6 460 465 10.1511/2014.111.460
- Ioannidis J. P. Why most published research findings are false PLoS Med 2005 2 8 e124 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
- John L. K. Loewenstein G. Prelec D. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling Psychological science 2012 23 5 524 532 10.1177/0956797611430953
- Kerr N. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known Personality and Social Psychology Review 1998 2 3 196 217 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
-
Nosek
B. A.
Lakens
D.
Registered reports
Social Psychology
2014
Open Science Framework, Registered Reports. Available from
https://osf.io/8mpji/wiki/home/ -
Scheibehenne
B.
Jamil
T.
Wagenmakers
E. -J.
Bayesian evidence synthesis can reconcile seemingly inconsistent results: The case of hotel towel reuse
Psychological Science
in press
Available from
https://osf.io/tz6xv - Schöenbrodt F. D. Wagenmakers E. -J. Zehetleitner M. Perugini M. Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences Psychological Methods in press 10.1037/met0000061
- Simmons J. P. Nelson L. D. Simonsohn U. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant Psychological Science 2011 22 11 1359 1366 10.1177/0956797611417632
- Song F. Hooper L. Loke Y. K. Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it? Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials 2013 5 51 81 10.2147/OAJCT.S34419
- Sterling T. D. Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance—or vice versa Journal of the American statistical association 1959 54 285 30 34 10.1080/01621459.1959.10501497
- Van Elk M. Matzke D. Gronau Q. F. Guan M. Vandekerckhove J. Wagenmakers E. J. Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming Frontiers in psychology 2015 6 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365
-
Wagenmakers
E. -J.
Morey
R. D.
Lee
M. D.
Bayesian benefits for the pragmatic researcher
Current Directions in Psychological Science
in press
Available from
https://osf.io/dpshk/ - Wagenmakers E. J. Wetzels R. Borsboom D. van der Maas H. L. Kievit R. A. An agenda for purely confirmatory research Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012 7 6 632 638 10.1177/1745691612463078
- Wicherts J. M. Bakker M. Molenaar D. Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results PloS one 2011 6 11 e26828 10.1371/journal.pone.0026828
- Wicherts J. M. Borsboom D. Kats J. Molenaar D. The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis American Psychologist 2006 61 7 726 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.401 | Journal eISSN: 2222-6931
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 23
Published on: Apr 4, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2016 Maedbh King, Fabian Dablander, Lea Jakob, Maria L. F. Agan, Felicitas Huber, Jonas M. B. Haslbeck, Katharina F. Brecht, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.