Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Arch-I-Scan Project: Artificial Intelligence and 3D Simulation for Developing New Approaches to Roman Foodways Cover

The Arch-I-Scan Project: Artificial Intelligence and 3D Simulation for Developing New Approaches to Roman Foodways

Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. Allison, PM (ed.). 2008. Dealing with legacy data, Internet Archaeology, 24. intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue24/index.html. DOI: 10.11141/ia.24.8
  2. Allison, PM. 2009. Understanding Pompeian Household Practices through their Material Culture. FACTA: A Journal of Roman Material Culture Studies, 3: 1132.
  3. Allison, PM. 2015. Everyday Eating and Drinking in Roman Domestic Contexts. In: Parr, BE, di Castro, A and Hope, C (eds.), Housing and habitat in the Mediterranean world: Cultural and Environmental Responses, 265279. Babesch Supplements 26. Leuven: Peeters.
  4. Allison, PM. 2016. Everyday foodways and social connections in Pompeian houses. In: Steel, L and Zinn, K (eds.), Exploring the materiality of food “stuffs”: Transformations, symbolic consumption and embodiments, 152186. London and New York: Routledge (Taylor and Francis).
  5. Allison, PM. 2017. Naming tablewares: using the artefactual evidence to investigate eating and drinking practices across the Roman world. In: Minchin, E and Jackson, H (eds.), Text and the material world: essays in honour of Graeme Clarke, SIMA – Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology, 186198. Uppsala: Astrom editions.
  6. Allison, PM. 2018. Meals and the Roman military. In: Ivleva, T, de Bruin, J and Driessen, M (eds.), Embracing the Provinces: Society and Material Culture of the Roman Frontier Regions. Essays in honour of Dr. Carol van Driel Murray, 103110. Oxford: Oxbow Books. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv13nb8qs.18
  7. Allison, PM. 2020. ‘The ceramics from the Insula del Menandro and the significance of their distribution’. In: Ossana, M and Toniolo, L (eds.), ‘Fecisti cretaria’: Dal frammento al contesto: studi sul vasellame del territorio vesuviano, 199209. Studi e richerche del parco archeologico di Pompei 40: Rome: L’erma di Bretschneider.
  8. Allison, PM, Pitts, M and Colley, S (eds.). 2018. Big Data on the Roman Table: New approachts to tablewares in the Roman world. Internet Archaeology, 50. https://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue50/index.html.
  9. Allison, PM and Sterry, M. 2015. “Family” meals? Who ate with whom and where in Roman military bases? In: Vagalinski, L (ed.), Proceedings of the XXII Limes Congress, Ruse, Bulgaria Sept. 2012, 487494. Sofia: National Archaeological Institute with Museum – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
  10. Alcock, SE and Cherry, J. (eds.). 2004. Side-by-Side Survey. Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxford: Oxbow.
  11. Anichini, F, et al. 2020. Developing the ArchAIDE Application: A digital workflow for identifying, organising and sharing archaeological pottery using automated image recognition. Internet Archaeology, 52. DOI: 10.11141/ia.52.7
  12. Appadurai, A (ed.). 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511819582
  13. ArchAIDE. 2019. ArchAIDe Portal for publications and outputs. Archaeological Data Service. https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/archaide_2019/downloads_amphora.cfm, last accessed 1 August 2022.
  14. ArchAIDE Project. 2022. Desktop, Shape Recognition. http://archaide-desktop.inera.it/shape-recognition, last accessed 1 August 2022.
  15. Banterle, F, Callieri, M, Scopigno, R, Itkin, B, Wolf, L and Dershowitz, N. 2017. VASESKETCH: Automatic 3D Representation of Pottery from Paper Catalog Drawings. 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition; 683690. DOI: 10.1109/ICDAR.2017.117
  16. Barceló, JA. 2004. Beyond Classification: Automatic Learning in Archaeology and Cultural Studies. Intelligenza Artificiale, 1: 2933.
  17. Baxter, M. 2014. Neural networks in archaeology. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/8434624/Neural_networks_in_archaeology [Last accessed 20 April 2020].
  18. Bell, S and Croson, C. 1998. Artificial Neural Networks as a Tool for Archaeological Data Analysis. Archaeometry, 40(1): 139151. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1998.tb00829.x
  19. Bermejo Tirado, J. 2018. Domestic patterns of tableware consumption in Roman Celtiberia. Internet Archaeology, 50. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.3
  20. Bes, P and Poblome, J. 2007. (Not) see the Wood for the Trees? 19,700+ Sherds of Sigillata and what we can do with them… Rei Cretariae Romanae Acta, 40: 110.
  21. Biddulph, E. 2018. From Table to Grave: Examining Table Settings in Roman Britain from Funerary Evidence. Internet Archaeology, 50. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.7
  22. Bird, J. 1993. 3rd-century Samian ware in Britain. Journal of Roman Pottery Studies, 6: 114.
  23. Blender. 2022. 3D modelling software. https://www.blender.org/, last accessed 1 August 2022.
  24. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
  25. Bourdieu, P. 1992. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  26. Brillat-Savarin, JA. 1825 [1949]. The physiology of taste or, Meditations on transcendental gastronomy. Translated by Fisher, MFK. Washington, DC: Counterpoint.
  27. Chen, C, Li, O, Tao, C, Barnett, AJ, Su, J and Rudin, C. 2019. This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition. 33rd Conference on Neural Information Processing System (NeurIPS 2019), Vancouver, Canada. arXiv:1806.10574.
  28. Colley, S. 2021. Arch-I-Scan: Roman Pottery and Machine Learning, YouTube Video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isA-APZGTG0.
  29. Cool, HEM. 2006. Eating and drinking in Roman Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489570
  30. Cooper, NJ, Johnson, E and Sterry, MJ. 2018. Eating In and Dining Out in Roman Leicester: Exploring pottery consumption patterns across the town and its suburbs. Internet Archaeology, 50. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.10
  31. Dananai, A and Deru, X. 2018. Pottery Function, Dining and Funerary Assemblages. A comparative study from northern Gaul. Internet Archaeology, 50. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.6
  32. Dietler, M. 2010. Archaeologies of Colonialism: Consumption, Entanglement and Violence in Ancient Mediterranean France. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520947948
  33. Di Ludovico, A, Camiz, S and Pieri, G. 2013. Comparative Use of Mathematical Models in an Investigation on Mesopotamian Cylinder Seals. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.), CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010, 495498. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  34. Douglas, M. 1984. Standard Social Uses of Food: Introduction. In: Douglas, M (ed.), Food in the Social Order: Studies of Food and Festivities in Three American Communities, 139. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  35. Dragendorff, H. 1895. Terra Sigillata: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des griechischen und römischen Keramik. Bonner Jahrbücher, 96: 1855.
  36. Durham, P, Lewis, P and Shennan, S. 1995. Artefact matching and retrieval using the Generalised Hough Transform. In: Wilcock, J and Lockyear, K (eds.), CAA 93. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1993, 2530. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum.
  37. Ettlinger, E, Hedinger, B, Hoffmann, B, Kendrick, P, Pucci, G, Roth-Rubi, K, Schneider, G, von Schnurbein, S, Wells, CM and Zabhelicky-Scheffenegger, S. 1990. Conspectus Formarum Terrae Sigillatae Italico Modo Confectae. Bonn: R. Habelt.
  38. Fentress, E. 2000. What are we counting for? In: Francovich, R and Patterson, H (eds.), Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 4452. Oxford: Oxbow.
  39. Fentress, E. 2010. Cooking pots and cooking practice: an African bain-marie? Papers of the British School at Rome, 78: 14550. DOI: 10.1017/S0068246200000842
  40. Freidenreich, D. 2011. Foreigners and their Food: Constructing Otherness in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Law. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520950276
  41. Gibson, P. 1996. An Archaeofaunal Ageing Comparative Study into the Performance of Human Analysis Versus Hybrid Neural Network Analysis. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 28: 229233.
  42. González Cesteros, H and Berni Millet, P. 2018. Roman Amphorae in Neuss: Augustan to Julio-Claudian Contexts. Oxford: Archeopress. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvndv94n
  43. Goody, J. 1982. Cooking, Cuisine and Class: A Study in Comparative Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511607745
  44. Huffer, D and Graham, S. 2018. Fleshing Out the Bones: Studying the Human Remains Trade with Tensorflow and Inception. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology, 1(1): 5563. DOI: 10.5334/jcaa.8
  45. Hossin, M and Sulaiman, MN. 2015. A Review of evaluation metrics for data classification evaluation. International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process, 5(2): 111. DOI: 10.5121/ijdkp.2015.5201
  46. Itkin, B, Wolf, L and Dershowitz, N. 2019. Computational Ceramicology, arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09960.
  47. Jurafsky, D, Chahuneau, V, Routledge, BR and Smith, NA. 2016. Linguistic Markers of Status in Food Culture: Bourdieu’s Distinction in a Menu Corpus. Journal of Cultural Analysis. DOI: 10.22148/16.007
  48. Kampel, M and Sablatnig, R. 2001. Automated 3d Recording of Archaeological Pottery. In: Bearman, D and Garzotto, F (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Cultural Heritage and Technologies in the Third Millennium Milan/Italy, Vol. 1: 169182.
  49. Kampel, M and Sablatnig, R. 2002 Computer Aided Classification of Ceramics. In: Niccolucci, F (ed.), Virtual Archaeology: Proceedings of the VAST2000 European Conference, Arezzo, 7782. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  50. Kampel, M and Sablatnig, R. 2006. 3D Data Retrieval for Archaeological Pottery. In: Pan, HZZ, Thwaites, H, Addison, AC and Forte, M (eds.), Interactive Technologies and Sociotechnical Systems, Proceedings of 12th International Conference, VSMM 2006, Xi’an, China, October 18–20: 387395. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/11890881_42
  51. Kampel, M, Mara, H and Sablatnig, R. 2006. Automated Investigation of Archaeological Vessels. In: Luise, M (ed.), Proceedings of EUSIPCO2006: 13th European Signal Processing Conference, Florence/Italy, Sept. 4–8
  52. Karasik, A and Smilansky, U. 2011. Computerized morphological classification of ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38: 26442657. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.05.023
  53. LeCun, Y, Kavukcuoglu, K and Farabet, C. 2010. Convolutional networks and applications in vision. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, (ISCAS), Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), 25356. DOI: 10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537907
  54. Li-Ying, Q and Ke-Gang, W. 2010. Kernel Fuzzy Clustering Based Classification of Ancient-Ceramic Fragments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Information Management and Engineering, 348350. DOI: 10.1109/ICIME.2010.5477818
  55. Lucena, M, Martínez-Carrillo, AL, Fuertes, JM, Carrascosa, F and Ruiz, A. 2014. Applying mathematical morphology for the classification of Iberian Ceramics from the upper valley of Guadalquivir river. In: Martínez-Trinidad, JF, Olvera-Lopez, JA, Salas-Rodríguez, J and Suen, CY (eds.), Pattern Recognition. MCPR 2014. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07491-7_35
  56. Luley, B. 2018. A Terra Sigillata Revolution? Terra sigillata consumption in first-century AD Roman Mediterranean Gaul. Internet Archaeology, 50. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.8
  57. Ma, Q, Yan, A, Hu, Z, Li, Z and Fan, B. 2000. Principal Component Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks applied to the Classification of Chinese Pottery of Neolithic Age. Analytica Chimica Acta, 406: 247256. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00764-3
  58. MacClancy, J. 1992. Consuming Culture. London: Chapmans.
  59. Maiza, C and Gaildrat, V. 2005. Automatic Classification of Archaeological Potsherds. In: Dimitri, P (ed.), The 8th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Artificial Intelligence, 3IA’2005, Limoges, France, 11/05/2005-12/05/2005, 135147. Limoges: Université de Limoges.
  60. Makridis, M and Daras, P. 2012. Automatic classification of archaeological pottery sherds. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 5(4). DOI: 10.1145/2399180.2399183
  61. Marshall, M and Seeley, F. 2018. From the Spreadsheet to the Table? Using ‘spot-dating’ level pottery records from Roman London to explore functional trends among open vessel forms. Internet Archaeology, 50. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.9
  62. Matplotlib. 2022. Python plotting package. https://pypi.org/project/matplotlib/, last accessed 1 August 2022.
  63. Mees, AW. 2007. Diffusion et datation des sigillées signées et décorées de La Graufesenque en Europe. L’influence de l’armée sur l’évolution du pouvoir d’achat et du commerce dans les provinces romaines. Actes du Congrès de Langres. Marseille: Société Française d’Étude le Céramique Antique en Gaule, 145208.
  64. Mees, AW. 2016. Was there a Difference between Roman ‘Civil’ and ‘Military’ Samian (terra sigillata) Market Supply? Finding answers with statistical distribution analysis methods. Internet Archaeology, 50. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.16
  65. Mees, AW and Polak, M. 2013. Scattered Pots. Exploring Spatial and Chronological Aspects of Samian Ware. In: Fulford, M and Durham, E (eds.), Seeing Red: New Economic and Social Perspective on Terra Sigillata, 3648. London: Institute of Classical Studies.
  66. Monteil, G. 2013. Samian plain vessels – a review of their development in the 2nd c. AD. In: Fulford, M and Durham, E (eds.), Seeing Red: New economic and social perspectives on Gallo-Roman terra sigillata, BICS Supplement 102, London, 349367.
  67. Núñez Jareño, SJ, van Helden, DP, Mirkes, EM, Tyukin, IY and Allison, PM. 2021a. Learning from Scarce Information: Using Synthetic Data to Classify Roman Fine Ware Pottery. Entropy, 23(1140). DOI: 10.3390/e23091140
  68. Núñez Jareño, SJ, van Helden, DP, Mirkes, EM, Tyukin, IY and Allison, P. 2021b. Arch-I-Scan data repository. https://github.com/ArchiScn.
  69. Oxé, A, Comfort, H and Kenrick, P. 2000. Corpus Vasorum Arretinorum: a catalogue of the signatures, shapes and chronology of Italian sigillata (2nd edition). Bonn: R. Habelt.
  70. Piccoli, C, Aparajeya, P, Papadopoulos, GT, Bintliff, J, Leymarie, FF, Bes, P, van der Enden, M, Poblome, J and Daras, P. 2015. Towards the automatic classification of pottery sherds: two complementary approaches. In: Traviglia, A (ed.), Across Space and Time: Papers from the 41st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Perth, 25–28 March 2013, 463474. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  71. Pitts, M. 2014. Reconsidering Britain’s first urban communities. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 27: 13373. DOI: 10.1017/S1047759414001196
  72. Pitts, M. 2015. Globalisation, circulation and mass consumption in the Roman world. In: Pitts, M and Versluys, MJ (eds), Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture, 6998. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107338920.006
  73. Poblome, J, Willet, R, Firat, N, Martens, F and Bes, P. 2013. Tinkering with Urban Survey Data: How Many Sagalassos-es do we Have? In: Johnson, P and Millett, M (eds.), Archaeological Survey and the City, 146175. Oxford: Oxbow. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dwwz.10
  74. Polak, M. 2000. South Gaulish Terra Sigillata with Potters’ Stamps from Vechten. Nijmegen: REI CRETARIAE ROMANAE FAVTORVM ACTA, SVPPLEMENTYM 9
  75. Polak, M. 2016. The Pottery Finds from the Western Canabae Legionis at Nijmegen (NL): some Methods for Spatial and Chronological Analysis. REI CRETARIAE ROMANAE FAVTORVM ACTA, 44: 397406.
  76. Polak, M. 2017. Old Wine in New Bottles. Reflections on the Organization of the Production of Terra Sigillata at La Graefesenque. In: Bird, J (ed.), Form and Fabric: Studies in Rome’s Material Past in Honour of B.R. Hartley, 115121. Oxford: Oxbow. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dtvk.18
  77. Sahlins, M. 1976. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  78. Selvaraju, RR, Gogswell, M, Das, A, Vedantam, R, Parikh, D and Batra, D. 2019. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization. International Journal of Computer Vision, 128: 336359. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7
  79. Smith, P, Bespalov, D, Shokoufandeh, A and Jeppson, P. 2010. Classification of Archaeological Ceramic Fragments Using Texture and Color Descriptors. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology – Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases IV. Vol. 2670, 426437. DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2010.5543523
  80. Sun, Y, Chockler, H, Huang, X and Kroening, D. 2019. Explaining Image Classifiers using Statistical Fault Localization, arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.02374.
  81. Swan, VG. 1999. The Twentieth Legion and the history of the Antonine Wall reconsidered. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, 129: 399480.
  82. Teichner, F and Pons Pujol, L. 2008. Roman Amphora Trade across the Straits of Gibraltar: an ancient ‘anti-economic practice’. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 27(3): 3030314. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0092.2008.00309.x
  83. Timby, J. 2020. Review of P. M. Allison, M. Pitts, and S. Colley (eds) Big Data on the Roman Table: New approachts to tablewares in the Roman world. Internet Archaeology, 50(2018). Britannia, 51: 529530. DOI: 10.1017/S0068113X20000161
  84. Tyers, PA. 2014. Potsherd. Atlas of Roman Pottery. https://potsherd.net/atlas/types/sigillata/gallery. (Accessed 25/01/2022).
  85. Tyukin, I, Sofeikov, K, Levesley, J, Gorban, AN, Allison, P and Cooper, NJ. 2018. Exploring Automated Pottery Identification [Arch-I-Scan]. Internet Archaeology, 50. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.11
  86. Van der Veen, V. 2018. Form Follows Function. A new approach to determining vessel function. Internet Archaeology, 50. https://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue50/2/index.html. DOI: 10.11141/ia.50.2
  87. van Oyen, A. 2015. The Roman City as Articulated through Terra Sigillata. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 34(3): 279299. DOI: 10.1111/ojoa.12059
  88. van Oyen, A. 2016. How Things make History. The Roman Empire and its Terra Sigillata Pottery. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.5117/9789462980549
  89. Wang, H, He, Z, Huang, Y, Chen, D and Zhou, Z. 2017. Bodhisattva Head Images Modeling Style Recognition of Dazu Rock Carvings based on Deep Convolutional Network. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 27: 6071. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.03.006
  90. Webster, P. 1996. Roman Samian Pottery in Britain. York: Council for British Archaeology.
  91. Whitelaw, T. 2012. Collecting Cities: some Problems and Prospects. In: Johnson, P and Millett, M (eds.), Archaeological Survey and the City, 70106. Oxford: Oxbow. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dwwz.8
  92. Willet, R. 2014. Experiments with diachronic data distribution methods applied to Eastern Sigillata a in the Eastern Mediterranean. Journal on Hellenistic and Roman Material Culture, 3(1): 3969. DOI: 10.11116/HEROM.3.3
  93. Wolf, E. 1982. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  94. Woolf, G. 1998. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511518614
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.92 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 19, 2022
|
Accepted on: Jul 7, 2022
|
Published on: Aug 17, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Daniël van Helden, Evgeny Mirkes, Ivan Tyukin, Penelope Allison, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.