Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Examining Gender Disparities in Computational Archaeology Publications: A Case Study in the Journal of Computational Applications in Archaeology and the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference Proceedings Cover

Examining Gender Disparities in Computational Archaeology Publications: A Case Study in the Journal of Computational Applications in Archaeology and the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference Proceedings

Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Volume 5 (2022): Issue 1
By: Phyllis S. Johnson  
Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. 1Bardolph, DN. 2014. A Critical Evaluation of Recent Gendered Publishing Trends in American Archaeology. American Antiquity, 79(3): 522–540. DOI: 10.7183/0002-7316.79.3.522
    Back to article
  2. 2Beaudry, MC and White, J. 1994. Cowgirls with the Blues? A Study of Women’s Publication and the Citation of Women’s Work in Historical Archaeology. In: Claassen, C (ed.), Women in Archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 138–158.
    Back to article
  3. 3Bernick, K and Zacharias, SK. 1995. The Status of Women in British Columbia Archaeology. Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d’Archéologie, 19: 79–86.
    Back to article
  4. 4Beyer, S. 2014. Why Are Women Underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender Differences in Stereotypes, Self-Efficacy, Values, and Interests and Predictors of Future CS Course-Taking and Grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2–3): 153–192. DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2014.963363
    Back to article
  5. 5Conkey, MW and Spector, JD. 1984. Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7: 1–38. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-003107-8.50006-2
    Back to article
  6. 6Convertino, C. 2020. Nuancing the Discourse of Underrepresentation: A Feminist Post-Structural Analysis of Gender Inequality in Computer Science Education in the US. Gender and Education, 32(5): 594–607. DOI: 10.1080/09540253.2019.1632417
    Back to article
  7. 7Fulkerson, TJ and Tushingham, S. 2019. Who Dominates the Discourses of the Past? Gender, Occupational Affiliation, and Multivocality in North American Archaeology Publishing. American Antiquity, 84(3): 379–399. DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2019.35
    Back to article
  8. 8Gero, JM. 1991. Genderlithics: Women’s Roles in Stone Tool Production. In: Gero, JM and Conkey, MW (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 163–193.
    Back to article
  9. 9Goldstein, L, Mills, BJ, Herr, S, Burkholder, JE, Aiello, L and Thornton, C. 2018. Why Do Fewer Women Than Men Apply for Grants After Their PhDs? American Antiquity, 83(3): 367–386. DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2017.73
    Back to article
  10. 10Handly, MJ. 1995. A Gendered Review of the “Canadian Archaeological Association Bulletin” (1969–1976) and the “Canadian Journal of Archaeology” (1977–1993): The First Twenty-Five Years. Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d’Archéologie, 19: 61–78.
    Back to article
  11. 11Harris, LB and McKinnon, J. 2016. A Job Market and Benchmarking Survey of Maritime Archaeology. 2015 Underwater Archaeology Proceedings, 143–150.
    Back to article
  12. 12Heath-Stout, LE. 2019. Diversity, Identity, and Oppression in the Production of Archaeological Knowledge. Boston: Boston University (unpublished PhD Thesis).
    Back to article
  13. 13Heath-Stout, LE. 2020. Who Writes About Archaeology? An Intersectional Study of Authorship in Archaeological Journals. American Antiquity, 85(3): 407–426. DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2020.28
    Back to article
  14. 14Huggett, J. 2014. Promise and Paradox: Accessing Open Data in Archaeology. In: Mills, C, Pidd, M and Ward, E (eds.), Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012: Studies in the Digital Humanities. Sheffield: The Digital Humanities Institute.
    Back to article
  15. 15Jalbert, CL and Heath-Stout, LE. 2021. The Texas Archeological Society: An Analysis of Current Demographics and Diachronic BTAS Authorship (1929–2019). Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society, 92: 213–231.
    Back to article
  16. 16Kelley, J and Hill, W. 1994. Relationships Between Graduate Training and Placement in Canadian Archaeology. In: Nelson, SM, Nelson, MC and Wylie, A (eds.), Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association, pp. 47–52. DOI: 10.1525/ap3a.1994.5.1.47
    Back to article
  17. 17Master, A, Cheryan, S and Meltzoff, AN. 2016. Computing Whether She Belongs: Stereotypes Undermine Girls’ Interest and Sense of Belonging in Computer Science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3): 424. DOI: 10.1037/edu0000061
    Back to article
  18. 18Overholtzer, L and Jalbert, CL. 2021. A “Leaky” Pipeline and Chilly Climate in Archaeology in Canada. American Antiquity, 86(2): 261–282. DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2020.107
    Back to article
  19. 19Penner, AM. 2015. Gender Inequality in Science. Science, 347(6219): 234–235. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa3781
    Back to article
  20. 20Rautman, AE. 2011. Who Gets Published in American Antiquity? SAA Archaeological Record, 12(2): 25–26.
    Back to article
  21. 21Reisman, J. 1990. Gender Inequality in Computing. Computers in Human Services, 7(1–2): 45–63. DOI: 10.1300/J407v07n01_04
    Back to article
  22. 22Sax, LJ, Lehman, KJ, Jacobs, JA, Kanny, MA, Lim, G, Monje-Paulson, L and Zimmerman, HB. 2017. Anatomy of an Enduring Gender Gap: The Evolution of Women’s Participation in Computer Science. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(2): 258–293. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306
    Back to article
  23. 23Souleles, D. 2020. What to Do with a Predator in Your Bibliography. Allegra Lab Anthropology for Radical Optimism, https://allegralaboratory.net/what-to-do-with-the-predator-in-your-bibliography/?fbclid=IwAR3heMzAFp87BMEhbdtbeOPdeiz3OPlm-cld8fe0hnVQdiBxVCbqS6uVq9s, accessed June 22, 2022.
    Back to article
  24. 24Speakman, RJ, Hadden, CS, Colvin, MH, Cramb, J, Jones, KC, Jones, TW, Kling, CL, Lulewicz, I, Napora, KG, Reinberger, KL, Ritchison, BT, Rivera-Araya, MJ, Smith, AK and Thompson, VD. 2018a. Choosing a Path to the Ancient World in a Modern Market: The Reality of Faculty Jobs in Archaeology. American Antiquity, 83(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2017.36
    Back to article
  25. 25Speakman, RJ, Hadden, CS, Colvin, MH, Cramb, J, Jones, KC, Jones, TW, Lulewicz, I, Napora, KG, Reinberger, KL, Ritchison, BT, Edwards, AR and Thompson, VD. 2018b. Market Share and Recent Hiring Trends in Anthropology Faculty Positions. PLOS ONE, 13(9): e0202528. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202528
    Back to article
  26. 26Thelwall, M, Abdoli, M, Lebiedziewicz, A and Bailey, C. 2020. Gender Disparities in UK Research Publishing: Differences Between Fields, Methods and Topics. El Profesional de la Información, 29(4): 1–21. DOI: 10.3145/epi.2020.jul.15
    Back to article
  27. 27Tushingham, S, Fulkerson, T and Hill, K. 2017. The Peer Review Gap: A Longitudinal Case Study of Gendered Publishing and Occupational Patterns in a Female-Rich Discipline, Western North America (1974–2016). PLOS ONE, 12(11): e0188403. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188403
    Back to article
  28. 28Vitores, A and Gil-Juárez, A. 2016. The Trouble with ‘Women in Computing’: A Critical Examination of the Deployment of Research on the Gender Gap in Computer Science. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(6): 666–680. DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2015.1087309
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.84 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 17, 2021
Accepted on: Aug 25, 2022
Published on: Sep 23, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Gender,
Computational Archaeology,
Publishing,
Diversity

© 2022 Phyllis S. Johnson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 5 (2022): Issue 1Next article