Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digitally-Mediated Practices of Geospatial Archaeological Data: Transformation, Integration, & Interpretation Cover

Digitally-Mediated Practices of Geospatial Archaeological Data: Transformation, Integration, & Interpretation

Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. 1 Abu-Lughod, L. 1991. Writing Against Culture. In: Fox, RG (ed.), Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, 137162. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
  2. 2 Alberts, G, Went, M and Jansma, R. 2017. Archaeology of the Amsterdam Digital City; Why Digital Data are Dynamic and Should Be Treated Accordingly. Digital Technology, Culture and Society, 1(1–2): 146159. DOI: 10.1080/24701475.2017.1309852
  3. 3 Aldenderfer, MS and Maschner, HDG. (eds.) 1996. Anthropology, Space, and Geographic Information Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. 4 Allison, P. 2008. Dealing with Legacy Data: An Introduction. Internet Archaeology, 24. DOI: 10.11141/ia.24.8
  5. 5 Andrews, G. 1997. Pyramids and Palaces, Monsters and Masks: The Golden Age of Maya Architecture. Lancaster, California: Labyrinthos.
  6. 6 Austin, A. 2014. Mobilizing Archaeologists: Increasing the Quantity and Quality of Data Collected in the Field with Mobile Technology. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 2(1): 1323. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.2.1.13
  7. 7 Aveni, AF and Hartung, H. 1986. Maya City Planning and the Calendar. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 76(7): 187. DOI: 10.2307/1006457
  8. 8 Beale, G and Reilly, P. 2017. Digital Practice as Meaning Making in Archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 44. DOI: 10.11141/ia.44.13
  9. 9 Bell, E, Canuto, M and Sharer, R. (eds.) 2004. Understanding Early Classic Copan. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.
  10. 10 Benardou, A, Champion, E, Dallas, C and Hughes, LM. 2018. Introduction: A Critique of Digital Practices and Research Infrastructures. In: Benardou, A, Champion, E, Dallas, C and Hughes, LM (eds.), Cultural Heritage Infrastructures in Digital Humanities, 114. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315575278-1
  11. 11 Bentkowska-Kafel, A and Denard, H. 2012. Introduction. In: Bentkowska, A, Denard, H and Baker, D (eds.), Paradata and Transparency in Visual Heritage, 16. Series: Digital Research in the Arts and Humanities. London: Routledge.
  12. 12 Bentkowska-Kafel, A, Denard, H and Baker, D. (eds.) 2012. Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage. Series: Digital Research in the Arts and Humanities. London: Routledge.
  13. 13 Boyer, E. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  14. 14 Brunke, L. 2018. Uncertainty in Archaeological 3D Reconstruction: A Case Study of Monument 434 at the Via Appia near Rome. Unpublished thesis (MSc), Leiden University.
  15. 15 Caraher, W. 2016. Slow Archaeology: Technology, Efficiency, and Archaeological Work. In: Averett, E, et al. (eds.), Mobilizing the Past for a Digital Future: The Potential of Digital Archaeology, 421442. Grand Forks: The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota.
  16. 16 Cavillo, N and Garnet, E. 2019. Data Intimacies: Building Infrastructures for Intensified Embodied Encounters with Air Pollution. The Sociological Review, 67(2): 340356. DOI: 10.1177/0038026119830575
  17. 17 Chase, AF, Chase, DZ, Weishampel, JF, Drake, JB, Shrestha, RL, Slatton, KC, Awe, JJ and Carter, WE. 2011. Airborne LiDAR, Archaeology, and the Ancient Maya Landscape at Caracol, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(2): 387398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.09.018
  18. 18 Clarke, M. 2015. The Digital Dilemma: Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record. Advances in Archaeological Practices, 3(4): 313330. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.3.4.313
  19. 19 Clifford, J and Marcus, GE. (eds.) 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  20. 20 Connolly, J and Lake, M. 2006. Geographic Information Systems in Archaeology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  21. 21 Costa, S, Beck, A, Bevan, A and Ogden, J. 2013. Defining and Advocating Open Data in Archaeology. In: Earl, G, Sly, T, Chrysanthi, A, Murrieta-Flores, P, Papadopoulos, C, Romanowska, I and Wheatley, D (eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), 449456. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9789048519590-048
  22. 22 Dallas, C. 2007. An agency-oriented approach to digital curation theory and practice. In: Trant, J and Bearman, B (eds.), ICHIM ‘07, International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting, 4972. Toronto: Archives and Museum Informatics.
  23. 23 Demján, P and Dreslerova, D. 2016. Modelling Distribution of Archaeological Settlement Evidence Based on Heterogeneous Spatial and Temporal Data. Journal of Archaeological Science, 69: 100109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2016.04.003
  24. 24 Denard, H. 2012. A New Introduction to the London Charter. In: Bentowska-Kafel, A, Denard, H and Baker, D (eds.), Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage, 5771. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
  25. 25 Digital Preservation Coalition. 2015. Digital Preservation Handbook. 2nd Edition. Available at https://dpconline.org/handbook [Last accessed 16 July 2019].
  26. 26 Engel, C and Grossner, K. 2014. Representing the Archaeological Process at Çatalhöyük in a Living Archive. In: Hodder, I and Marciniak, A (eds.), Assembling Çatalhöyük, 1323. Leeds: Maney Publishing.
  27. 27 Esteva, M, Trelogan, J, Rabinowitz, A, Walling, D and Pipkin, S. 2010. From Site to Long-term Preservation: A Reflexive System to Manage and Archive Digital Archaeological Data. In: Archiving 2010 – Preservation Strategies and Imaging Technologies for Cultural Heritage Institutions and Memory Organizations Final Program and Proceedings (Den Haag, Netherlands 1-4 June 2010), 16. Springfield, VA: Society for Imaging Science & Technology.
  28. 28 Fahmie, TA and Hanley, GP. 2008. Progressing Toward Data Intimacy: A Review of Within-session Data Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(3): 31931. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-319
  29. 29 Faniel, I, Kansa, E, Whitcher Kansa, S, Barrera-Gomez, J and Yakel, E. 2013. The Challenges of Digging Data: A Study of Context in Archaeological Data Reuse. In: JCDL 2013 Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 295304. New York: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2467696.2467712
  30. 30 Fash, WL and Agurcia Fasquelle, R. 1996. Visión del Pasado Maya. San Pedro Sula: Asociación Copán.
  31. 31 Fash, WL and Long, K. 1983. Mapa Arqueológico del Valle de Copán. In: Baudez, CF (ed.), Introducción a la Arqueología de Copán. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Instituto Hondureño de Antropología e Historia.
  32. 32 Forte, M. 2014. 3D Archaeology: New Perspectives and Challenges—The Example of Çatalhöyük. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies, 2(1): 129. DOI: 10.5325/jeasmedarcherstu.2.1.0001
  33. 33 Forte, M and Pescarin, S. 2012. Behaviours, Interactions and Affordance in Virtual Archaeology. In: Bentkowska-Kafel, A, Denard, H and Baker, D (eds.), Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage, 189201. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
  34. 34 Forte, M and Pietroni, E. 2009. 3D Collaborative Environments in Archaeology: Experiencing the Reconstruction of the Past. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 7: 5776. DOI: 10.1260/147807709788549349
  35. 35 Gaffney, V, Stančič, Z and Watson, H. 1995. The Impact of GIS on Archaeology: A Personal Perspective. In: Lock, G and Stančič, Z (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, 211229. London: Taylor & Francis.
  36. 36 Gagnon, SA, Brunyé, TT, Robin, C, Mahoney, CR and Taylor, HA. 2011. High and Mighty: Implicit Associations between Space and Social Status. Frontiers in Pyschology, 2: 110. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00259
  37. 37 Gattiglia, G. 2015. Think Big about Data: Archaeology and the Big Data Challenge. Archäologische Informationen: Open Access and Open Data, 38: 113124. DOI: 10.11588/ai.2015.1.26155
  38. 38 Gillings, M and Goodrick, GT. 1996. Sensuous and Reflexive GIS: Exploring Visualisation and VRML. Internet Archaeology, 1. DOI: 10.11141/ia.1.2
  39. 39 Gruen, A, Remondino, R and Zhang, L. 2004. Photogrammetric Reconstruction of the Great Buddha of Bamiyan, Afghanistan. The Photogrammetric Record, 19(107): 177199. DOI: 10.1111/j.0031-868X.2004.00278.x
  40. 40 Gunnarsson, F. 2018. Archaeological Challenges, Digital Possibilities: Digital Knowledge Development and Communication in Contract Archaeology. Unpublished thesis (Licentiate), Linneaus University.
  41. 41 Harrison, TP. 2018. Computational Research on the Ancient Near East (CRANE): Large-Scale Data Integration and Analysis in Near Eastern Archaeology. Levant: The Journal of the Council for British Research in the Levant. DOI: 10.1080/00758914.2018.1492784
  42. 42 Hodder, I. 1984. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  43. 43 Hodder, I. 1997. ‘Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible’: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology. Antiquity, 71: 691700. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00085410
  44. 44 Hodder, I. 2000. Where is Çatalhöyük? Developing a Reflexive Method in Archaeology. In: Hodder, I (ed.), Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Çatalhöyük, 315. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
  45. 45 Hodder, I. 2003. Archaeological Reflexivity and the “Local” Voice. Anthropological Quarterly, 76(1): 5569. DOI: 10.1353/anq.2003.0010
  46. 46 Hohmann, H and Vogrin, A. 1982. Die Architektur von Copán (Honduras): Vermessung, Plandarstellung, Untersuchung der baulichen Elemente und des räumlichen Konzepts. Verlagsanstalt, Graz/Austria: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.
  47. 47 Holdaway, SJ, Emmitt, J, Phillipps, R, and Masoud-Ansari, S. 2019. A Minimalist Approach to Archaeological Data Management Design. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 26: 873893. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-018-9399-6
  48. 48 Hong, S. 2016. Data’s Intimacy: Machinic Sensibility and the Quantified Self. Communication +1, 5(1): Article 3. DOI: 10.7275/R5CF9N15
  49. 49 Howey, MCL and Brouwer Burg, M. 2017. Assessing the State of Archaeological GIS Research: Unbinding Analyses of Past Landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 84: 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.002
  50. 50 Huggett, J. 2014. Promise and Paradox: Accessing Open Data in Archaeology. In: Mills, C, Pidd, M and Ward, E (eds.), Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012, 114. Sheffield: The Digital Humanities Institute.
  51. 51 Huggett, J. 2015. Digital Haystacks: Open Data and the Transformation of Archaeological Knowledge. In: Wilson, A and Edwards, B (eds.), Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice, 69. Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open. DOI: 10.1515/9783110440171-003
  52. 52 Huggett, J. 2017. The Apparatus of Digital Archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 44. DOI: 10.11141/ia.44.7
  53. 53 Hutson, SR. 2012. “Unavoidable Imperfections”: Historical Contexts for Representing Ruined Maya Buildings. In Pillsbury, J (ed.), Past Presented: Archaeological Illustration and the Ancient Americas, 282316. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
  54. 54 Inomata, T. (ed.) 2008. Warfare and the Fall of a Fortified Center: Archaeological Investigations at Aguateca. Vanderbilt Institute of Mesoamerican Archaeology, 3. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
  55. 55 Jones, I and Levy, T. (eds.) 2018. Cyber-archaeology and grand narratives: Where do we currently stand? In Cyber-archaeology and grand narratives. In: Levy, T and Jones, IWN (eds.), One World Archaeology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65693-9_1
  56. 56 Juarez, S, Salgado-Flores, S and Hernández, C. 2019. The Site of Noh K’uh, Chiapas, Mexico: A Late Preclassic Settlement in the Mensabak Basin. Latin American Antiquity, 30(1): 211217. DOI: 10.1017/laq.2018.81
  57. 57 Kansa, EC. 2010. Open Context in Context: Cyber Infrastructure and Distributed Approaches to Publish and Preserve Archaeological Data. The SAA Archaeological Record, 10(4): 1216.
  58. 58 Kansa, EC, Kansa, SW, Burton, MM and Stankowski, C. 2010. Googling the Grey: Open Data, Web Services, and Semantics. Archaeologies, 6(2): 301326. DOI: 10.1007/s11759-010-9146-4
  59. 59 Kansa, SW and Kansa, EC. 2018. Data Beyond the Archive in Digital Archaeology: An Introduction to the Special Section. Journal of Archaeological Practice, 6(2): 8992. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2018.7
  60. 60 Kantner, J. 2000. Realism vs. Reality: Creating Virtual Reconstructions of Prehistoric Architcture. In: Barceló, J, Forte, M and Sanders, D (eds.), Virtual Reality in Archaeology, 4783. Oxford: BAR International Series.
  61. 61 Kensek, K, Dodd, L and Cipolla, N. 2004. Fantastic Reconstructions or Reconstructions of the Fantastic? Tracking and Presenting Ambiguity, Alternatives, and Documentation in Virtual Worlds. Automation in Construction, 13: 175186. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2003.09.010
  62. 62 Kintigh, K. 2006. The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. American Antiquity, 71(3): 56778. DOI: 10.1017/S0002731600039810
  63. 63 Kintigh, K, Spielmann, K, Brin, A, Candan, KS, Clark, TC and Peeples, M. 2017. Data Integration in the Service of Synthetic Research. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6(1): 3041. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2017.33
  64. 64 Kubler, G. 1905. The Art And Architecture Of Ancient America: The Mexican, Maya And Andean Peoples. New Haven: Yale University.
  65. 65 Kwan, M. 2002. Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4): 645661. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8306.00309
  66. 66 Landau, K. 2015. Spatial Logic and Maya City Planning: The Case for Cosmology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 25(1): 275292. DOI: 10.1017/S095977431400105X
  67. 67 Landau, K. 2016. Maintaining the State: Centralized Power and Ancient Neighborhoods in Copán, Honduras. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Northwestern University.
  68. 68 Landau, K, Richards-Rissetto, H and Wolf, M. 2014. Tacking Back and Forth: Using 3D Tools to Guide Archaeological Excavation, Analysis, and Interpretation. In: 79th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. Austin, Texas.
  69. 69 Lengyel, D and Toulouse, C. 2015. The Consecution of Uncertain Knowledge, Hypotheses and the Design of Abstraction. In: Börner, W and Ulhlirz, S (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, 116. Stadtarchäologie, Vienn: Museen der Stadt Wien.
  70. 70 Lightfoot, KG. 1995. Culture Contact Studies: Redefining the Relationship between Prehistoric and Historical Archaeology. American Antiquity, 60(2): 199217. DOI: 10.2307/282137
  71. 71 Llobera, M. 2001. Building Past Landscape Perception With GIS: Understanding Topographic Prominence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 28(9): 10051014. DOI: 10.2307/282137
  72. 72 Llobera, M. 2007a. Modeling Visibility through Vegetation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(7): 799810. DOI: 10.1080/13658810601169865
  73. 73 Llobera, M. 2007b. Reconstructing Visual Landscapes. World Archaeology, 39(1): 5169. DOI: 10.1080/00438240601136496
  74. 74 Llobera, M. 2012. Life on a Pixel: Challenges in the Development of Digital Methods within an “Interpretive” Landscape Archaeology Framework. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19(4): 495509. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-012-9139-2
  75. 75 Llobera, M, Fábrega-Álvarez, P and Parcero-Oubiña, C. 2011. Order in Movement: a GIS approach to accessibility. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(4): 843851. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.11.006
  76. 76 Lock, G. (ed.) 2000. Beyond the Map: Archaeology and Spatial Technologies. NATO Science Series. Washington, DC: IOS Press.
  77. 77 Lock, G and Stančič, Z. (eds.) 1995. Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  78. 78 Loten, SH and Pendergast, DM. 1984. A Lexicon for Maya Architecture. Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum.
  79. 79 Lukas, D, Engel, C and Mazzucato, C. 2018. Towards a Living Archive: Making Multi Layered Research Data and Knowledge Generation Transparent. Journal of Field Archaeology, 43(Sup1): S19S30. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2018.1516110
  80. 80 Maca, AL. 2002. Spatio-temporal Boundaries in Classic Maya Settlement Systems: Copán’s Urban Foothills and the Excavations at Group 9J–5. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Harvard University.
  81. 81 Macfarland, K and Vokes, A. 2016. Dusting Off the Data Curating and Rehabilitating Archaeological Legacy and Orphaned Collections. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 4(2): 161175. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.4.2.161
  82. 82 Maschner, HDG. 1996. New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper.
  83. 83 Maudslay, AP. 1889–1902. Biologia Centrali-Americana: Archaeology. London: Dulau and Co.
  84. 84 Mayer-Schönberger, V and Cukier, K. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. United Kingdom: John Murray Publishers.
  85. 85 Morley, SG. 1920. The Inscriptions at Copán. Carnegie Institution of Washington publication, 219. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
  86. 86 Morrison, KD and Lycett, MT. 1997. Inscriptions as Artifacts: Precolonial South India and the Analysis of Texts. Journal of Anthropological Method and Theory, 4(3/4): 215237. DOI: 10.1007/BF02428062
  87. 87 Paliou, E. 2014. Visibility Analysis in 3D Built Spaces: A New Dimension to the Understanding of Social Space. In: Paliou, E, Lieberwirth, U and Polla, S (eds.), Spatial Analysis and Social Spaces: Interdisciplinary approaches to the Interpretation of Prehistoric and Historic Built Environments, 91113. Berlin: Topoi – Berlin Studies of the Ancient World/Topoi – Berliner Studien der Alten Welt 18. DOI: 10.1515/9783110266436
  88. 88 Paliou, E. 2017. Visual Perception in Past Built Environments: Theoretical and Procedural Issues in the Archaeological Application of Three-Dimensional Visibility Analysis. In: Siart, C and Forbriger, M (eds.), Digital Geoarchaeology: New Techniques for Interdisciplinary Human Environment Research, 6580. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25316-9_5
  89. 89 Prufer, KM, Thompson, AE and Kennett, DJ. 2015. Evaluating Airborne LiDAR for Detecting Settlements and Modified Landscapes in Disturbed Tropical Environments at Uxbenká, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 57: 113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.013
  90. 90 Rapoport, A. 1988. Levels of Meaning in the Built Environment. In: Poyatos, F (ed.), Cross-cultural Perspectives in Non-verbal Communication, 317336. Toronto: C.J. Hogrefe.
  91. 91 Remondino, F, Gruen, A, von Schwerin, J, Eisenbeiss, H, Rizzi, A, Girardi, G, Sauerbier, M and Richards-Rissetto, H. 2009. Multi-Sensor 3D Documentation of the Maya Site of Copan. Proceedings of 22nd CIPA Symposium, Kyoto, Japan, Commission, V, WGV/4.
  92. 92 Richards-Rissetto, H and Plessing, R. 2015. Procedural Modeling for Ancient Maya Cityscapes: Initial Methodological Challenges and Solutions. 2015 Digital Heritage International Congress, 2: 8588. IEEE Conference Publications. DOI: 10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2015.7419458
  93. 93 Richards-Rissetto, H. 2012. Studying Social Interaction at the Ancient Maya Site of Copán, Honduras: A Least Cost Approach to Configurational Analysis. In: White, DA and Surface-Evans, S (eds.), Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes: Archaeological Case Studies, 194231. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  94. 94 Richards-Rissetto, HM. 2010. Exploring Social Interaction at the Ancient Maya City of Copán, Honduras: A Multi-scalar Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analysis of Access and Visibilty. Unpublished thesis (PhD), The University of New Mexico.
  95. 95 Richards-Rissetto, HM. 2017a. An Iterative 3DGIS Analysis of the Role of Visibility in Ancient Maya Landscapes: A Case Study from Copán, Honduras. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(2): ii195ii212. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqx014
  96. 96 Richards-Rissetto, HM. 2017b. What Can GIS + 3D Mean for Landscape Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Science, 84: 1021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.005
  97. 97 Richards-Rissetto, HM and Landau, K. 2014. Movement as a Means of Social (Re)production: Using GIS to Measure Social Integration across Urban Landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41: 365375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.006
  98. 98 Richards-Rissetto, HM, Robertsson, J, Remondino, F, Agugiaro, G, von Schwerin, J and Giradi, G. 2012. Kinect and 3D GIS in Archaeology. In: 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, 331337. IEEE Conference Publications. DOI: 10.1109/VSMM.2012.6365942
  99. 99 Richards-Rissetto, HM, Robertsson, J, Remondino, F, Agugiaro, G, von Schwerin, J and Girardi, G. 2013. Geospatial Virtual Heritage: An Interactive, Gesture-based 3D GIS to Engage the Public with Ancient Maya Archaeology. In: Earl, G, Sly, T, Chrysanthi, A, Murrieta-Flores, P, Papadopoulos, C, Romanowska, I and Wheatley, D (eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), 118130. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9789048519590-013
  100. 100 Richards-Rissetto, HM and von Schwerin, J. 2017. A Catch 22 of 3D Data Sustainability: Lessons in 3D Archaeological Data Management & Accessibility. Journal of Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 6: 3848. DOI: 10.1016/j.daach.2017.04.005
  101. 101 Roosevelt, CH, Cobb, P, Moss, E, Olson, BR and Ünlüsoy, S. 2015. Excavation is Destruction Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practice. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40(3): 325346. DOI: 10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004
  102. 102 Saldana, M. 2015. An Integrated Approach to the Procedural Modeling of Ancient Cities and Buildings. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 30(suppl_1, December 2015): i148i163. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqv013
  103. 103 Salzman, PC. 2002. On Reflexivity. American Anthropologist, 104(3): 805813. DOI: 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.805
  104. 104 Saperstein, P. 2016. Accurate Measurement with Photogrammetry at Large Sites. Journal of Archaeological Science, 66: 137145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.002
  105. 105 Smith, N. 1995. Towards a Study of Ancient Greek Landscapes: The Perseus GIS. In: Lock, G and Stančič, Z (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, 23948. London: Taylor & Francis.
  106. 106 Stahl, AB. 1993. Concepts of Time and Approaches to Analogical Reasoning in Historical Perspective. American Antiquity, 58(2): 235260. DOI: 10.2307/281967
  107. 107 Stephens, JL and Catherwood, F. 1841. Incidents of Travel in Central America, Chiapas and Yucatan. New York: Harper & Bros. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.84376
  108. 108 Sullivan, EA. 2017. Seeking a Better View: Using 3D to Investigate Visibility in Historic Landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(4): 12271255. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-016-9311-1
  109. 109 Tilley, CY. (ed.) 1990. Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics and Post-Structuralism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  110. 110 Tilley, CY. 1993. Interpretative Archaeology. Explorations in Anthropology. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
  111. 111 Tilley, CY. 1997. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
  112. 112 Tringham, R. 2010. Forgetting and Remembering: The Digital Experience and Digital Data. In: Borić, D (ed.), Archaeology and Memory, 68104. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
  113. 113 Ullah, IT. 2015. Integrating Older Survey Data into Modern Research Paradigms: Identifying and Correction Spatial Error in “Legacy” Datasets. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3(4): 331350. DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.3.4.331
  114. 114 von Schwerin, J, Lyons, M, Loos, L, Billen, N, Auer, M and Zipf, A. 2016. Show Me the Data!: Structuring Archaeological Data to Deliver Interactive, Transparent 3D Reconstructions in a 3D WebGIS. In: Münster, S, Pfarr-Harfst, M, Kuroczyński, P and Ioannides, M (eds.), 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II: How to Manage Data and Knowledge Related to Interpretive Digital 3D Reconstructions of Cultural Heritage, 198230. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47647-6_10
  115. 115 von Schwerin, J, Richards-Rissetto, H, Remondino, F, Spera, MG, Auer, M, Billen, N, Loos, L, Stelson, L and Reindel, M. 2016. Airborne LiDAR Acquisition, Post-processing and Accuracy-checking for a 3D WebGIS of Copán, Honduras. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 5: 85104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.11.005
  116. 116 Webster, DL. (ed.) 1989. The House of the Bacabs, Copán, Honduras. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.
  117. 117 Wells, J, Kansa, EC, Kansa, SW, Yerka, SJ, Anderson, DG, Bissett, TG, Myers, KN and DeMuth, RC. 2014. Web-based Discovery And Integration Of Archaeological Historic Properties Inventory Data: The Digital Index of North American Archaeology (DINAA). Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(3): 349360. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqu028
  118. 118 Wheatley, D and Gillings, M. 2002. Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The Archaeological Applications of GIS. Baton Raton, Florida: CRC Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780203302392
  119. 119 Willey, GR and Leventhal, RM. 1979. Prehistoric Settlement at Copán. In: Hammond, N and Willey, GR (eds.) Maya Archaeology and Ethnohistory, 75102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  120. 120 Witcher, RE. 2008. (Re)surveying Mediterranean rural landscapes: GIS and legacy survey data. Internet Archaeology, 24. DOI: 10.11141/ia.24.2
  121. 121 Wood, WR. 1990. Ethnohistory and Historical Method. Archaeological Method and Theory, 2: 81109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20170205.
  122. 122 Wright, H and Richards, J. 2018. Reflections on Collaborative Archaeology and Large-Scale Online Research Infrastructures. Journal of Field Archaeology, 43(Sup 1): S6067. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2018.1511960
  123. 123 Wylie, A. 2017. How Archaeological Evidence Bites Back: Strategies for Putting Old Data to Work in New Ways. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(2): 203225. DOI: 10.1177/0162243916671200
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.30 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 8, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 3, 2019
Published on: Aug 22, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Heather Richards-Rissetto, Kristin Landau, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.