Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Theory in Archaeology, Theory in Computing 1: Cross-Fertilisation in CAA and TAG Conferences Between Archaeological Theory and Computer Applications Cover

Theory in Archaeology, Theory in Computing 1: Cross-Fertilisation in CAA and TAG Conferences Between Archaeological Theory and Computer Applications

By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Altaweel, M. 2007a. ‘Addressing the Structures and Dynamics of Modeled Human Ecologies’. In: Clark, JT and Hagemeister, EM (eds.) Digital Discovery Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage CAA2006 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 34th Conference, Fargo, United States, April 2006. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. CD-ROM 30–41.
  2. Altaweel, M. 2007b. ‘Social Modeling and Simulation Symposium’. In: Clark, JT and Hagemeister, EM (eds.) Digital Discovery Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage CAA2006 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 34th Conference, Fargo, United States, April 2006. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. CD-ROM 16–17.
  3. Angell, IO. 1978. ‘Megalithic Science: Ancient or Modern?’ In: Laflin, S (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1978 Proceedings of the Annual Conference organised at the Computer Centre, University of Birmingham. Birmingham: Computer Centre, University of Birmingham, pp. 5–12.
  4. Arnoldus-Huyzendveld, A, Citter, C and Pizziolo, G. 2016. ‘Predictivity–Postdictivity: a Theoretical Framework’. In: Campana, S, Scopigno, R, Carpentiero, G and Cirillo, M (eds.) CAA 2015 KEEP THE REVOLUTION GOING Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 593–598. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135955.69
  5. Barceló, JA. 1996. ‘Heuristic Classification and Fuzzy Sets: New Tools for Archaeological Typologies’. In: Kamermans, H and Fennema, K (eds.) Interfacing the Past. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology CAA95. Leiden: Institute of Prehistory, University of Leiden, pp. 155–164.
  6. Barceló, JA. 2008. ‘Towards a True Automatic Archaeology: Integrating Technique and Theory’. In: Posluschny, A, Lambers, K and Herzog, I (eds.) Layers of Perception Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, pp. 413–417.
  7. Barceló, JA. 2010. ‘Archaeological Theory, Techniques and Technologies: Beyond Quantification and Visualization Methods’. In: Niccolucci, F and Hermon, S (eds.) Beyond the Artifact Digital Interpretation of the Past Proceedings of CAA2004, Prato 13–17 April 2004. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 19–20.
  8. Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila, A. 1999. ‘New Techniques for Old Times. A General Introduction to Computing Archaeology’. In: Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila, A (eds.) New Techniques for Old Times CAA98 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.30861/9780860549611
  9. Barceló, JA, Cuesta JA, Castillo F del, Galán, JM, Mameli, M, Miguel, F, Santos, JL and Vilà, X. 2013. ‘Simulating Prehistoric Ethnicity: the case of Patagonian Hunter-Gatherers’. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.) CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 137–143.
  10. Barrett, JC. 1994. Fragments from antiquity: an archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC. Oxford: Blackwell.
  11. Baudrillard, J. 1983. Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).
  12. Bikoulis, P. 2016. ‘Hypothesis Testing and Validation in Archaeological Networks’. In: Campana, S, Scopigno, R, Carpentiero, G and Cirillo, M (eds.) CAA 2015 KEEP THE REVOLUTION GOING Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 543–554. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135955.65
  13. Binford, LR. 1962. ‘Archaeology as anthropology’. American Antiquity, 11: 198–200.
  14. Binford, LR. 1964. ‘A consideration of archaeological research design’. American Antiquity, 29: 425–441. DOI: 10.2307/277978
  15. Binford, LR. 1975. ‘Sampling, judgement, and the archaeological record’. In: Mueller, JW (ed.) Sampling in archaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 251–257.
  16. Binford, LR. 1977. For theory building in archaeology. New York: Academic Press.
  17. Binford, LR. 1978. Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.
  18. Binford, LR. 1981. Bones: ancient men and modern myths. New York: Academic Press.
  19. Binford, LR. 1983. In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  20. Bogdanovic, I, Vicente, O and Barceló, JA. 2004. ‘A Theory of Archaeological Knowledge Building by Using the Internet – the DIASPORA Project’. In: Fennema, K and Kamermans, H (eds.) Making the Connection to the Past CAA99 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 27th Conference, Dublin, April 1999. Leiden: Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, pp. 31–38.
  21. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
  22. Brughmans, T, Isaksen, L and Earl, G. 2012. ‘Connecting the Dots: an Introduction to Critical Approaches in Archaeological Network Analysis’. In: Zhou, M, Romanowska, I, Wu, Z, Xu, P and Verhagen, P (eds.) Revive the Past Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) Proceedings of the 39th International Conference, Beijing, April 12–16. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, pp. 359–369. DOI: 10.1017/9789048516865.042
  23. Brughmans, T and Peeples, M. 2017. ‘Trends in archaeological network research: A bibliometric analysis’. Journal of Historical Network Research, 1: 1–24.
  24. Bruseker, G, Daskalaki, M, Doerr, M and Stead, S. 2018. ‘Is that a Good Concept?’ In: Matsumoto, M and Uleberg, E (eds.) CAA2016 Oceans of Data The Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 25–32. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135958.6
  25. Callow, P. 1981. ‘Have Computer, Will Classify? A Stone Age Problem’. In: Graham, I and Webb, E (eds.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1981 Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 21–22 1981. London: Institute of Archaeology, University of London, pp. 26–35.
  26. Chliaoutakis, A, Sarris, A and Chalkiadakis, G. 2016. ‘An application of Agent-based Model and GIS in Minoan Crete’. In: Campana, S, Scopigno, R, Carpentiero, G and Cirillo, M (eds.) CAA 2015 KEEP THE REVOLUTION GOING Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 479–488. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135955.60
  27. Chrysanthi, A, Murrieta Flores, P and Papadopoulos, C. (eds.) 2012. Thinking Beyond the Tool. Archaeological Computing and the Interpretive Process. Oxford: Archaeopress. DOI: 10.30861/9781407309279
  28. Clarke, DL. 1968. Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.
  29. Copeland, JM. 1983. ‘Information Retrieval Systems for Archaeological Data’. In: Haigh, JBG (ed.) Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 25–26 March 1983, University of Bradford. Bradford: School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, pp. 39–46.
  30. Cripps, P. 2007. ‘Pathways, Perception and the Development of Place: Computational Approaches to Movement and Perception of Landscape in Prehistory’. In: Figueiredo, A and Leite Velho, G (eds.) The world is in your eyes CAA2005 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 33rd Conference, Tomar, March 2005. Tomar: CAA Portugal, pp. 323–326.
  31. Cripps, P and May, K. 2010. ‘To OO or not to OO? Revelations from Ontological Modelling of an Archaeological Information System’. In: Niccolucci, F and Hermon, S (eds.) Beyond the Artifact. Digital Interpretation of the Past. Proceedings of CAA2004, Prato 13–17 April 2004. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 59–63.
  32. De la Cruz, D, Estévez, J, Noriega, P, Pérez, M, Piqué, R, Sabater-Mir, J, Vila, A and Villatoro, D. 2013. ‘Norms in H-F-G societies. Grounds for Agent-based Social Simulation’. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.) CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 161–167.
  33. Djindjian, F. 2015. ‘Computers and Mathematics in Archaeology, Anatomy of an Ineluctable Success’! In: Giligny, F, Djindjian, F, Costa, L, Moscati, P and Robert, S (eds.) CAA20214 21st Century Archaeology Concepts, Methods and Tools Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135883.4
  34. Dobbins, JJ and Gruber, E. 2013. ‘Modelling hypotheses in Pompeian archaeology: the House of Faun’. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.) CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 77–84.
  35. Doran, J. 1974. ‘What Computers Can’t Do for Archaeologists’. In: Wilcock, JD and Laflin, S (eds.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1974 Proceedings of the Annual Conference organised by the Computer Centre University of Birmingham, January 1974. Birmingham: Computer Centre, University of Birmingham, pp. 69–70.
  36. Doran, J. 1976. ‘Complex Process Models and the Understanding of Prehistoric Change’. In: Laflin, S (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1976 Proceedings of the Annual Conference organised at the Computer Centre, University of Birmingham, January 1976. Birmingham: Computer Centre, University of Birmingham, pp. 21–25.
  37. Duncan, R, Hodson, FR, Orton, CR, Tyers PA and Vekaria A. 1988. Data analysis for archaeologists: the Institute of Archaeology programs. London: London Institute of Archaeology.
  38. Earl, GP. 1999. ‘Visualising Danebury: Modelled Approaches to Spatial Theory’. In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet CAA97 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 259–264.
  39. Ennals, R and Brough, D. 1982. ‘Representing the Knowledge of the Expert Archaeologist’. In: Laflin, S (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1982 Conference Proceedings. Birmingham: Centre for Computing and Computer Science, University of Birmingham, pp. 56–62.
  40. Fernández González, JM, Polo Marquéz, A and Cerrillo Cuenca, E. 2007. ‘Bases for the Creation of Ontology in the Context of Archaeology’. In: Figueiredo, A and Leite Velho, G (eds.) The world is in your eyes CAA2005 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference, Tomar, March 2005. Tomar: CAA Portugal, pp. 285–290.
  41. Flude, K. 1983. ‘Problems in Archaeological Computing’. In: Haigh, JBG (ed.) Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 25–26 March 1983, University of Bradford. Bradford: School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, pp. 7–14.
  42. Gaffney, V and van Leusen, M. 1995. ‘Postscript - GIS, environmental determinism and archaeology: a parallel text’. In: Lock, GR and Stančič, Z (eds.) Archaeology and Geographic Information Systems: A European perspective. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 367–382. DOI: 10.1201/9780367810467-27
  43. Gardner, A, Lake, M and Sommer, U. 2013 (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.001.0001
  44. George, S. 1986. ‘Interrogating Fuzzy Data’. In: Webb, E (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985. Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29–30, 1985. London: Institute of Archaeology, University of London, pp. 75–80.
  45. Gilchrist, R. 1999. Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past. London and New York: Routledge.
  46. Gillings, M. 1998. ‘Embracing uncertainty and challenging dualism in the GIS-based study of a palaeo-flood plain’. European Journal of Archaeology, 1(1): 117–144. DOI: 10.1177/146195719800100106
  47. Gillings, M. 1999. ‘Engaging Place: a Framework for the Integration and Realisation of Virtual-Reality Approaches in Archaeology’. In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet CAA97 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 247–254.
  48. González-Pérez, CA. 2004. ‘Deconstructing the Product into Theory’. In: Fennema, K and Kamermans, H (eds.) Making the connection to the Past CAA99 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 27th Conference, Dublin, April 1999. Leiden: Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, pp. 39–42.
  49. Gonzalez-Perez, CA, Martín-Rodilla, P and Blanco-Rotea, R. 2015. ‘Expressing Temporal and Subjective Information about Archaeological Entities’. In: Traviglia, A (ed.) Across Space and Time Papers from the 41st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Perth, 25–28 March 2013. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 326–335. DOI: 10.5117/9789089647153-33
  50. Gray, N. 1995. ‘Seeing nature’. History of European Ideas, 20: 341–348. DOI: 10.1016/0191-6599(95)92961-S
  51. Grimley, BJ. 1983. ‘Relational Problems in Archaeological Data Handling’. In: Haigh, JBG (ed.) Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 25–26 March 1983, University of Bradford. Bradford: School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, pp. 31–38.
  52. Gruber, E and Dobbins, J. 2013. ‘Illuminating historical architecture: The House of the Drinking Contest at Antioch’. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.) CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 71–76.
  53. Haigh, JGB. 1981. ‘Procedures for the Surface Sampling of Archaeological Sites’. In: Graham, I and Webb, E (eds.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1981 Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 21–22 1981. London: Institute of Archaeology, University of London, pp. 61–69.
  54. Hermon, S, Niccolucci, F, Alhaique, F, Iovino, M-R and Leonini, V. 2004. ‘Archaeological typologies – an archaeological fuzzy reality’. In: Magistrat der Stadt Wien – Referat Kulturelles Erbe – Stadtarchäologie Wien (ed.) [Enter the Past] The E-way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage CAA 2003 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 31st conference, Vienna, Austria, April 2003. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 30–34.
  55. Herzog, I. 2013. ‘Theory and Practice of Cost Functions’. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.) CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 375–382.
  56. Herzog, I. 2016. ‘Dispersal versus Optimal Path Calculation’. In Campana, S, Scopigno, R, Carpentiero, G and Cirillo, M (eds.) CAA2015 Keep the Revolution Going Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 567–577. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135955.67
  57. Herzog, I. 2018. ‘Boundaries of Agrarian Production in the Bergisches Land in 1715 AD’. In: Matsumoto, M and Uleberg, E (eds.) CAA2016 Oceans of Data. The Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 299–310. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135958.31
  58. Hiebel, G and Hanke, K. 2011. ‘Concept for an Ontology Based Web GIS Information System for HiMAT’. In: Jerem, E, Redő, F and Szeverényi, V (eds.) On the Road to Reconstructing the Past Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) Proceedings of the 36th International Conference. Budapest, April 2–6, 2008. Budapest: Archeaeolingua, pp. CD-ROM 243–250.
  59. Higginbottom, G and Mom, V. 2020. Place: ‘The Physical Embodiment of Collective Information’. In: Glover, JB, Moss, J and Rissolo, D (eds.) Digital Archaeologies, Material Worlds (Past and Present): Proceedings of the 45rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Tübingen: Tübingen University Press, pp. 432–556.
  60. Hodder, I. 1982a. The present past: an introduction to anthropology for archaeologists. London: Batsford.
  61. Hodder, I. 1982b. Symbols in action: Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  62. Hodder, I. 1984. ‘Archaeology in 1984’. Antiquity, 58: 25–32. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00055940
  63. Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Horrocks, C and Jevtic, Z. 1996. Baudrillard for beginners. Cambridge: Icon Books.
  65. Hug, C, Salinesi, C, Deneckère, R and Lamassé, S. 2012. ‘Process modeling for Humanities: tracing and analyzing scientific processes’. In: Zhou, M, Romanowska, I, Wu, Z, Xu, P and Verhagen, P (eds.) Revive the Past Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) Proceedings of the 39th International Conference, Beijing, April 12–16. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, pp. 245–254. DOI: 10.1017/9789048516865.028
  66. Iliff, N. 1980. ‘The Use of Simulation in the Understanding of Patterning in Cemeteries: Its Potentials, Problems and Limitations’. In: Laflin, S (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1980. Birmingham: Computer Centre, University of Birmingham, pp. 28–34.
  67. Ingold, T. 1995. ‘Building, dwelling, living: how animals and people make themselves at home in the world’. In: Strathern, M (ed.) Shifting Contexts: Transformation in Anthropological Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 57–80. DOI: 10.4324/9780203450901_chapter_3
  68. James, VS. 2020. ‘Context as Theory: Towards Unification of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology’. In: Glover, JB, Moss, J and Rissolo, D (eds.) Digital Archaeologies, Material Worlds (Past and Present): Proceedings of the 45rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Tübingen: Tübingen University Press, pp. 145–156.
  69. Jeffrey, S, Richards, J, Ciravegna, F, Waller, S, Chapman, S, Zhang, Z and Austin, A. 2011. ‘When Ontology and Reality Collide: The Archaeotools Project, Faceted Classification and Natural Language Processing in an Archaeological Context’. In: Jerem, E, Redő, F and Szeverényi, V (eds.) On the Road to Reconstructing the Past Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) Proceedings of the 36th International Conference. Budapest, April 2–6, 2008. Budapest: Archeaeolingua, pp. CD-ROM 285–290.
  70. Johnson, M. 1999. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
  71. Kamermans, H. 2010. ‘The Application of Predictive Modelling in Archaeology: Problems and Possibilities’. In: Niccolucci, F and Hermon, S (eds.) Beyond the Artifact Digital Interpretation of the Past. Proceedings of CAA2004, Prato 13–17 April 2004. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 271–277.
  72. Kamermans, H and Wansleeben, M. 1999. ‘Predictive Modelling in Dutch Archaeology, Joining Forces’. In: Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila, A (eds.) New Techniques for Old Times CAA98 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 225–230.
  73. Kirkinen, T. 1999. ‘GIS-Assisted Data Analysis – Finding Meanings in Complex Spatial Data Sets’. In: Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila, A (eds.) New Techniques for Old Times CAA98 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 255–258.
  74. Kuhn, TS. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  75. Laflin, S. 1999a. ‘Twenty Five Years of Computer Applications in Archaeology’. In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet CAA97 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 3–4.
  76. Laflin, S. 1999b. ‘Twenty Five Years of the CAA Conference: a Personal View’. In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet CAA97 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 11–12.
  77. Lang, N and Stead, S. 1992. ‘Sites and Monuments Records in England — Theory and Practice’. In: Lock, G and Moffett, J (eds.) CAA91 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1991. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum, pp. 69–76.
  78. Laxton, RR and Litton, CD. 1983. ‘Information Theory and Dendrochronology; the Effect of Pre-Whitening’. In: Haigh, JBG (ed.) Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 25–26 March 1983, University of Bradford. Bradford: School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, pp. 137–150.
  79. Light, RB. 1984. ‘Microcomputers in Museums’. In: Laflin, S (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1984. Conference Proceedings. Birmingham: Centre for Computing and Computer Science, University of Birmingham, pp. 33–37.
  80. Llobera, M. 1996. ‘Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology’. Antiquity, 70: 612–622. DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00083745
  81. Lock, G. 1995. ‘Archaeological Computing, Archaeological Theory, and Moves towards Contextualism’. In: Huggett, J and Ryan, N (eds.) CAA94 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1994. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum, pp. 12–18.
  82. Lock, G and Daly, P. 1999. ‘Looking at Change, Continuity and Time in GIS: an Example from the Sangro Valley, Italy’. In: Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila, A (eds.) New Techniques for Old Times CAA98 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 259–264.
  83. Lock, G and Pouncett, J. 2007. ‘Network Analysis in Archaeology Session Introduction: An Introduction to Network Analysis’. In: Clark, JT and Hagemeister, EM (eds.) Digital Discovery Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage CAA2006 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 34th Conference, Fargo, United States, April 2006. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. CD-ROM 61–63.
  84. Lock, G and Pouncett, J. 2010. ‘Walking the Ridgeway Revisited: The Methodological and Theoretical Implications of Scale Dependency for the Derivation of Slope and the Calculation of Least-Cost Pathways’. In: Frischer, B, Webb Crawford, J and Koller, D (eds.) Making History Interactive Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) Proceedings of the 37th International Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America, March 22–26. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 192–203.
  85. Martín-Rodilla, P. 2015. ‘An Empirical Approach to the Analysis of Archaeological Discourse’. In: Traviglia, A (ed.) Across Space and Time Papers from the 41st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Perth, 25–28 March 2013. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 319–325. DOI: 10.5117/9789089647153-32
  86. McAuley, J and Kilfeather E. 2007. ‘A Comparative Analysis of Ontological Techniques in Supporting Online Communities’. In: Figueiredo, A and Leite Velho, G (eds.) The world is in your eyes CAA2005 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 33rd Conference, Tomar, March 2005. Tomar: CAA Portugal, pp. 277–284.
  87. Missikoff, O. 2004. ‘Ontologies as a Reference Framework for the Management of Knowledge in Archaeological Domain’. In: Magistrat der Stadt Wien – Referat Kulturelles Erbe – Stadtarchäologie Wien (ed.) [Enter the Past] The E-way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage CAA 2003, Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Proceedings of the 31st conference, Vienna, Austria, April 2003. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 35–39.
  88. Mlekuž, D. 2013. ‘Everything Flows: Computational Approaches To Fluid Landscapes’. In: Earl, G, Sly, T, Chrysanthi, A, Murrieta-Flores, P, Papadopoulos, C, Romanowska, I and Wheatley, D (eds.) Archaeology in the Digital Era Volume II e-Papers from the 40th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Southampton, 26–30 March 2012. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 839–845.
  89. Moscati, P. 2015. T’owards a History of Archaeological Computing: An Introduction’. In: Giligny, F, Djindjian, F, Costa, L, Moscati, P and Robert, S (eds.) CAA20214 21st Century Archaeology Concepts, Methods and Tools Proceedidngs of the 42nd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 9–15.
  90. Niccolucci, F, Felicetti, A, Samaes, M, Hermon, S and Nys, K. 2013. ‘Ontologies and Semantic Tools for the Management of Full-text Archaeological Documentation. Assessments from the Hala Sultan Tekke Case-study’. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.) CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 247–250.
  91. Niccolucci, F and Hermon, S. 2010. ‘A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Reliability in Archaeological Virtual Reconstruction’. In: Niccolucci, F and Hermon, S (eds.) Beyond the Artifact Digital Interpretation of the Past Proceedings of CAA2004, Prato 13–17 April 2004. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 28–35.
  92. Nüsslein, A Nuninger, L and Verhagen, P. 2020. ‘To Boldly Go where No One Has Gone before: Integrating Social Factors in Site Location Analysis and Predictive Modelling, the Hierarchical Types Map’. In: Glover, JB, Moss, J and Rissolo, D (eds.) CAA2017 Digital Archaeologies, Material Worlds (Past and Present) Proceedings of the 45th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Tübingen: Tübingen University Press, pp. 15–31.
  93. Orton, CR. 1999. ‘Plus Ça Change? – Perceptions of Statistics in Archaeology’. In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet CAA97 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp. 25–34.
  94. Paliou, E. 2008. ‘An Autonomous Agent Approach to the Investigation of Intra-Site Movement and Visibility: The Visual Consumption of Theran Murals from the Public Spaces of LBA Akrotiri (Thera, Greece)’. In: Posluschny, A, Lambers, K and Herzog, I (eds.) Layers of Perception Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, pp. 328–335.
  95. Paliou, E and Knight, DJ. 2013. ‘Mapping the senses: perceptual and social aspects of late antique liturgy in San Vitale, Ravenna’. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.) CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 229–236.
  96. Peeters, H. 2010. ‘Breaking Down an Early Neolithic Palimpsest Site – Some Notes on the Concept of Percolation Theory and the Understanding of Spatial Pattern Formation’. In: Niccolucci, F and Hermon, S (eds.) Beyond the Artifact Digital Interpretation of the Past Proceedings of CAA2004, Prato 13–17 April 2004. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 423–428.
  97. Perry, S and Taylor, JS. 2018. ‘Theorising the Digital: A Call to Action for the Archaeological Community’. In: Matsumoto, M and Uleberg, E (eds.) CAA2016 Oceans of Data. The Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 11–22. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135958.5
  98. Pescarin, S. 2011. ‘Explicit Theoretic Pipeline: GIS Analysis and Data Integration for Archaeological Landscape Reconstruction’. In: Jerem, E, Redő, F and Szeverényi, V (eds.) On the Road to Reconstructing the Past Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) Proceedings of the 36th International Conference, Budapest, April 2–6, 2008. Budapest: Archeaeolingua, pp. CD-ROM 446–453.
  99. Power, M. 2020. ‘Non-Binary and Intersex Visibility and Erasure in Roman Archaeology’. Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal, 3(1): 11. DOI: 10.16995/traj.422
  100. Posluschny, AG. 2007. ‘From Landscape Archaeology to Social Archaeology. Finding Patterns to Explain the Development of Early Celtic “Princely Sites” in Middle Europe’. In: Clark, JT and Hagemeister, EM (eds.) Digital Discovery Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage CAA2006 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 34th Conference, Fargo, United States, April 2006. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. CD-ROM 117–127.
  101. Posluschny, AG. 2010. ‘Over the Hills and Far Away? Cost Surface Based Models of Prehistoric Settlement Hinterlands’. In: Frischer, B, Webb Crawford, J. and Koller, D (eds.) Making History Interactive Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) Proceedings of the 37th International Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America, March 22–26. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 313–319.
  102. Prentiss, AM. 2021. ‘Theoretical plurality, the extended evolutionary synthesis, and archaeology’. PNAS, 118(2): e2006564118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006564118
  103. Rains, MJ. 1984. ‘Home Computers in Archaeology’. In: Laflin, S (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1984 Conference Proceedings. Birmingham: Centre for Computing and Computer Science, University of Birmingham, pp. 14–26.
  104. Richards, J. 1986. ‘Into the Black Art: Achieving Computer Literacy in Archaeology’. In: Webb, E (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985 Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29–30, 1985. London: Institute of Archaeology, University of London, pp. 121–125.
  105. Riley, H. 1999. ‘The Use of Global Positioning System Technology to Record and Interpret Archaeological Sites and Landscapes’. In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet CAA97 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 189–194.
  106. Rodier, X, Kaddouri, L and Garmy, P. 2015. ‘Systemic Approach and Spatial Organization: from the City to Networks of Cities’. In: Traviglia, A (ed.) Across Space and Time Papers from the 41st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Perth, 25–28 March 2013. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 239–248. DOI: 10.5117/9789089647153-23
  107. Romanowska, I. 2015. ‘Agent-based Modelling and Archaeological Hypothesis Testing: the Case Study of the European Lower Palaeolithic’. In: Traviglia, A (ed.) Across Space and Time Papers from the 41st Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Perth, 25–28 March 2013. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 203–214. DOI: 10.5117/9789089647153-20
  108. Ryan, N. 1986. ‘Some Thoughts on an Archaeologist’s Toolkit’. In: Webb, E (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985 Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29–30, 1985. London: Institute of Archaeology, University of London, pp. 126–132.
  109. Ryan, NS. 1988. ‘A Bibliography of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology’. In: Rahtz, SPQ (ed.) Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1988 CAA88. Oxford: B.A.R., pp. 1–27.
  110. Scollar, I. 1999. ‘25 Years of Computer Applications in Archaeology’. In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet CAA97 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 5–10.
  111. Shanks, M and Tilley, C. 1987a. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  112. Shanks, M and Tilley, CY. 1987b. Social theory and archaeology. SL: Polity Press.
  113. Shanks, M and Tilley, C. 1992. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practise. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
  114. Smith, D and Atkin, M. 1986. ‘Computing and the Vicarage’. In: Webb, E (ed.) Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985 Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29–30, 1985. London: Institute of Archaeology, University of London, pp. 133–138.
  115. Smith, MJ. 2015. ‘The Digital Archaeological Workflow: a Case Study from Sweden’. In: Giligny, F, Djindjian, F, Costa, L, Moscati, P and Robert, S (eds.) CAA20214 21st Century Archaeology Concepts, Methods and Tools Proceedidngs of the 42nd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 215–220.
  116. Stančič, Z and Kvamme, KL. 1999. ‘Settlement Pattern Modelling through Boolean Overlays of Social and Environmental Variables’. In: Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila, A (eds.) New Techniques for Old Times CAA98 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 231–238.
  117. Stewart, J. 1999. ‘Has 25 Years of Computing Provided Greater Physical and Intellectual Access to Archaeology?’ In: Dingwall, L, Exon, S, Gaffney, V, Laflin, S and van Leusen, M (eds.) Archaeology in the Age of the Internet CAA97 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 19–24.
  118. Stig Sørensen, ML. 2000. Gender archaeology. Oxford: Polity Press.
  119. Stutt, A. 1988. ‘Second Generation Expert Systems, Explanations, Arguments and Archaeology’. In: Rahtz, SPQ (ed.) Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1988 CAA88. Oxford: B.A.R., pp. 351–368.
  120. Thomas, J. 1996. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: Routledge.
  121. Tilley, C. 1994. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg.
  122. Tolle, K, Wigg-Wolf, D and Gruber, E. 2018. ‘An Ontology for a Numismatic Island with Bridges to Others’. In: Matsumoto, M and Uleberg, E (eds.) CAA2016 Oceans of Data. The Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 103–108. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135958.14
  123. Trigger, BG. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  124. Ullah, II, Clow, Z and Meling, J. 2023. ‘Paradigm or Practice? Situating GIS in Contemporary Archaeological Method and Theory’. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 31: 1185–1231. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-023-09638-1
  125. Van Dommelen, P. 2011. ‘Postcolonial archaeologies between discourse and practice’. World Archaeology, 43(1): 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2011.544883
  126. Van Havre, G. 2020. ‘The dynamics of Brazilian rock art landscape: An Agent-Based Modelling approach to theories’. In: Glover, JB, Moss, J and Rissolo, D (eds.) Digital Archaeologies, Material Worlds (Past and Present): Proceedings of the 45rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Tübingen: Tübingen University Press, pp. 221–228.
  127. Van Leusen, M. 1999. ‘Viewshed and Cost Surface Analysis Using GIS (Cartographic Modelling in a Cell-Based GIS II)’. In: Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila. A (eds.) New Techniques for Old Times CAA98 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 215–224.
  128. Vassallo, V, Sorrentino, G, Gasanova, S and Hermon, S. 2018. ‘Integrating Analytical with Digital Data in Archaeology. Towards a Multidisciplinary Ontological Solution. The Salamis Terracotta Statues Case-Study’. In: Matsumoto, M and Uleberg, E (eds.) CAA2016 Oceans of Data. The Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 109–118. DOI: 10.2307/jj.15135958.15
  129. Verhagen, P. 2013. ‘On the Road to Nowhere? Least Cost Paths, Accessibility and the Predictive Modelling Perspective’. In: Contreras, F, Farjas, M and Melero, FJ (eds.) CAA2010 Fusion of Cultures Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 383–389.
  130. Verhagen, P, Kamermans, H, van Leusen, M, Deeben, J, Hallewas, D and Zoetbrood, P. 2010. ‘First Thoughts on the Incorporation of Cultural Variables into Predictive Modelling’. In: Niccolucci, F and Hermon, S (eds.) Beyond the Artifact Digital Interpretation of the Past Proceedings of CAA2004, Prato 13–17 April 2004. Budapest: Archaeolingua, pp. 307–311.
  131. Vermeulen, F. 1999. ‘A Computer-Aided Geo-Archaeological Survey of the Classical Landscape of Central Anatolia’. In: Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila, A (eds.) New Techniques for Old Times CAA98 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 275–282.
  132. Vis, B. 2013. ‘Boundary Concepts For Studying the Built Environment. A Framework of Socio-Spatial Reasoning for Identifying and Operationalising Comparative Analytical Units in GIS’. In: Earl, G, Sly, T, Chrysanthi, A, Murrieta-Flores, P, Papadopoulos, C, Romanowska, I and Wheatley, D (eds.) Archaeology in the Digital Era Volume II e-Papers from the 40th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Southampton, 26–30 March 2012. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 821–838.
  133. Wansleeben, M. 1988. ‘Applications of Geographical Information Systems in Archaeological Research’. In: Rahtz, SPQ (ed.) Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1988 CAA88. Oxford: B.A.R., pp. 435–452.
  134. Westwood, S, Baxter, MJ and Beardah, CC. 1999. ‘Sample Size Problems with Multivariate Archaeometric Data’. In: Barceló, JA, Briz, I and Vila, A (eds.) New Techniques for Old Times CAA98 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona, March 1998. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 155–158.
  135. Wheatley, D. 1993. ‘Going over Old Ground: GIS, Archaeological Theory and the Act of Perception’. In: Andresen, J, Madsen, T and Scollar, I (eds.) Computing the Past Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology CAA92. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 133–138.
  136. Wheatley, D. 2000. ‘Spatial Technology and Archaeological Theory Revisited’. In: Lockyear, K, Sly, TJT and Mihăilescu-Bîrliba, M (eds.) CAA96 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 123–132.
  137. Whitley, TG. 2002. ‘Modeling Archaeological and Historical Cognitive Landscapes in the Greater Yellowstone Region (Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho, USA) Using Geographic Information Systems’. In: Burenhult, G (ed.) Archaeological Informatics: Pushing The Envelope CAA2001 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 139–148.
  138. Whitley, TG. 2003. ‘GIS as an Interpretative Tool for Addressing Risk Management and Cognitive Spatial Dynamics in a Slave Society’. In: Doerr, M and Sarris, A (eds.) CAA 2002 The Digital Heritage of Archaeology Proceedings of the 30th CAA conference held at Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2–6 April 2002. Greece: Hellenic Ministry of Culture, pp. 209–215.
  139. Whitley, TG. 2004. ‘Causality and Cross-purposes in Archaeological Predictive Modelling’. In: Magistrat der Stadt Wien – Referat Kulturelles Erbe – Stadtarchäologie Wien (ed.) [Enter the Past] The E-way into the Four Dimensions of Cultural Heritage CAA 2003 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 31st conference, Vienna, Austria, April 2003. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 236–239.
  140. Wise, AL. 2000. ‘Building Theory into GIS-Based Landscape Analysis’. In: Lockyear, K, Sly, TJT and Mihăilescu-Bîrliba, M (eds.) CAA96 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 141–148.
  141. Zapłata, R. 2008. ‘Viewshed Analysis, Regional Studies and Cultural Perception’. In: Posluschny, A, Lambers, K and Herzog, I (eds.) Layers of Perception Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, p. 343 + CD-ROM.
  142. Zubrow, EBW. 1994. ‘Knowledge representation and archaeology: a cognitive example using GIS’. In: Renfrew, C and Zubrow, EBW (eds.) The ancient mind: Elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–118. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511598388.012
  143. Županek, B and Mlekuž, D. 2001. ‘Counting the Uncountable: A Quantitative Approach to the Religious Differences between the Roman Towns of Emona and Poetovio’. In: Stančič, Z and Veljanovski, T (eds.) Computing Archaeology for Understanding the Past CAA 2000 Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Proceedings of the 28th Conference, Ljubljana, April 2000. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 263–268.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.263 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Page range: 366 - 384
Submitted on: Dec 17, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 11, 2026
Published on: Oct 13, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Ulla Rajala, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.