Table 1
Conferences, events and situations where workshops were held at which the tutorials were tested.
| CONFERENCE OR EVENT | PERIOD | ONLINE, IN PERSON OR HYBRID | NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS | NUMBER OF REGISTRATIONS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAA Amsterdam | April 2023 | In person | 36 | 53 |
| EAA Belfast | August 2023 | In person | 21 | No registration |
| CAA-DE/NL-Fl Online workshop | October 2023 | Online | 40 | 76 |
| Reuvensdagen | November 2023 | In person | 13 | No registration |
| CAA-UK | November 2023 | Hybrid | 53 | No registration |
| Leiden (course) | December 2023 | In person | 11 | No registration |
| Aarhus | January/February 2024 | Online | 176 | >500 |
| Saxion | March 2023-January 2024 | In person | 18 | No registration |
| Total | 368 | >628 |
Figure 1
Screenshot of lesson 3 in tutorial 1 showing the population dynamics of the Long House Valley in the Artificial Anasazi model created by Axtell et al. (2002).
Figure 2
The nationality of the participants that filled in the survey.
Figure 3
The gender and age distribution of the respondents for each workshop.
Figure 4
The computer skills of the respondents.
Figure 5
Respondents knowledge of ABM per event (top), and knowledge of the various software packages for ABM (bottom), before participating in the workshops.
Figure 6
Respondents opinion on the quality of theory on ABM faceted out by event.
Figure 7
Impression of various workshops (CAA 2023 in Amsterdam and EAA 2023 in Belfast) with participants working.
Figure 8
Respondents rating of the workshop in general faceted for each event.
Figure 9
Respondents rating of the teaching material (top) and teachers (bottom) in general faceted for each event.